/show_bug.cgi?id=37018
Summary: Document how to use tomcat-SSL with a pkcs11 token
Product: Tomcat 5
Version: 5.5.9
Platform: Other
URL: http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5.0/docs/guide/security/p11gu
ide.html
OS/Version: other
/show_bug.cgi?id=36735
Summary: Problem with SSL - swf - Explorer
Product: Tomcat 5
Version: 5.0.28
Platform: Other
OS/Version: other
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: Catalina
AssignedTo
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36735.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27122.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35765.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
/show_bug.cgi?id=36133
Summary: Support JSS SSL implementation
Product: Tomcat 5
Version: 5.5.9
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P2
Component: Unknown
AssignedTo
Hello!
I'm trying to run Tomcat 5.5.10 [1] on user mode linux which is started in a
chrooted environment but Tomcat hangs when initializing the SSL-Connector -
i. e. the message
org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11AprProtocol init
does never show up in the log. When I try to connect to the SSL-port
Dear all
Actually, I would like to ask you that how can I do authentication and
secure line HTTPS (SSL) for my web pages ? It is worth mentioning that I am
using JSP and Tomcat 5.5.9 .
Thank you in advance.
Regards
Abdullah
Please post this, and any other requests relating to the usage of Tomcat
rather than the development of Tomcat, to the tomcat-user list.
Mark
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail:
/show_bug.cgi?id=35765
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|make the SSL cipher config |make the SSL cipher config
|in web.xml fail safe, i.e
/show_bug.cgi?id=35765
Summary: make the SSL cipher config in web.xml fail safe, i.e.
128+ bit strength by default
Product: Tomcat 5
Version: Nightly Build
Platform: Other
URL: http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5.0/docs/guide/security
Yep, this is a problem. And, as I said, we don't have keystores, so
even if it did pick up the new cert it still wouldn't work for us.
jean-frederic clere wrote:
OK I have added a new CA using:
+++
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ $JAVA_HOME/bin/keytool -import -trustcacerts -file
Chad La Joie wrote:
jean-frederic clere wrote:
Chad La Joie wrote:
Yeah, I know what mod-ssl says, and for most cases it's probably right,
however the optional_no_ca option is interesting to us because it
provides exactly the functionality that we need; accepting the client
cert, putting
for the SSL connector when client cert auth is used so that we
can support a stand alone Tomcat set up too.
Would this be possible?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Chad La Joie wrote:
Hey guys,
I was wondering if there were any thoughts on this particular
suggestion. I hadn't seen anything on the list.
BTW: mod-ssl says:
+++
In practice only levels none and require are really interesting, because level
optional doesn't work with all browsers
Yeah, I know what mod-ssl says, and for most cases it's probably right,
however the optional_no_ca option is interesting to us because it
provides exactly the functionality that we need; accepting the client
cert, putting it in a standard place, and allowing our application to do
the verification
Chad La Joie wrote:
Yeah, I know what mod-ssl says, and for most cases it's probably right,
however the optional_no_ca option is interesting to us because it
provides exactly the functionality that we need; accepting the client
cert, putting it in a standard place, and allowing our application
jean-frederic clere wrote:
Chad La Joie wrote:
Yeah, I know what mod-ssl says, and for most cases it's probably right,
however the optional_no_ca option is interesting to us because it
provides exactly the functionality that we need; accepting the client
cert, putting it in a standard
the cert on
to the Shibboleth server. This allows us to validate the certificate
against the cert chains in the metadata files within the server code (a
huge support boon for us). What we'd like to request is a similar
option for the SSL connector when client cert auth is used so that we
can
su correo ha sido recepcionado. gracias
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
su correo ha sido recepcionado. gracias
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
su correo ha sido recepcionado. gracias
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
su correo ha sido recepcionado. gracias
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
su correo ha sido recepcionado. gracias
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
su correo ha sido recepcionado. gracias
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
su correo ha sido recepcionado. gracias
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
su correo ha sido recepcionado. gracias
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
su correo ha sido recepcionado. gracias
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dear Customer,
Thank you for your interest in the services offered by TimesofMoney.com.We have
received your email. Our Customer Relations Officer will get in touch with you
shortly. Assuring you of our best services always.
Warm Regards,
Customer Relations
TimesofMoney.com
A Times Group
Dear Customer,
Thank you for your interest in the services offered by TimesofMoney.com.We have
received your email. Our Customer Relations Officer will get in touch with you
shortly. Assuring you of our best services always.
Warm Regards,
Customer Relations
TimesofMoney.com
A Times Group
support boon for us). What we'd like to request is a similar
option for the SSL connector when client cert auth is used so that we
can support a stand alone Tomcat set up too.
Would this be possible?
--
Chad La Joie 315Q St. Mary's Hall
Project Sentinel 202.687.0124
Hi,
I was trying to get tomcat 5.x (standalone) setup for mutual ssl for
(only some service URLs) with CRL/OCSP validations. If I write my own
CRL validator, how can I tell tomcat to invoke it for such requests?
I tried various docs, lists but couldn'tfind any pointers.
Any pointers are appeciated
Vicenc Beltran Querol wrote:
It has been a pleasure to post this information, and to receive constructive
and technically-reasoned answers like yours. Deciding which parameters
define the performance of a server is a great and never-ending discussion topic.
Anyway, feel free to send my any
Hi,
The results of the AB benchmark configured with 20 concurrent clients are
posted below,
If somebody is interested in more configurations (from 20 to 1 concurrent
clients)
they are available at http://www.bsc.es/edragon/pdf/TestAb.tgz
BTW, there is also available a comparison between
Am I reading the results correctly?
tomcat 5.5.9 - 16,331.81/sec
hybrid - 7,085.54/sec
that means the hybrid connector is 2x slower. If those results are
accurate, I would say the APR connector is much better choice.
peter lin
On 5/25/05, Vicenc Beltran Querol [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Peter Lin wrote:
Am I reading the results correctly?
tomcat 5.5.9 - 16,331.81/sec
hybrid - 7,085.54/sec
that means the hybrid connector is 2x slower. If those results are
accurate, I would say the APR connector is much better choice.
It's more complex than that.
The APR connector has a
Hi,
The APR connector has a trick to optimize pipelining (where a client
would do many requests on a single connection, but with a small delay
between requests - typically, it would happen when getting lots of
images from a website).
What's the trick? Are you trying to do blocking read
Vicenc Beltran Querol wrote:
It's great to read your opinions... ;)
Let's cut down on the broken record effect then: -1 for your code,
it's not a clean implementation ;) (I end up with a smiley, since you
did as well)
Rémy
On 5/25/05, Vicenc Beltran Querol [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I'm absolutely disconcerted. In your previous answeryou agreed that the
AB test is not good for comparing two different architectural
approaches. And you still wanna compare the performance of the hybrid
architecture using it.
Peter Lin wrote:
I'm not sure I agree with that statement. The reason for using apache
AB for small files under 2K is that JMeter is unable to max out the
server with tiny files. You can see the original number I produced
here http://people.apache.org/~woolfel/tc_results.html.
Since the bulk of
I took a look at the AB and Rubis numbers. Honestly I don't
understand the rubis graphs. From the AB results, it looks like the
connect, processing and wait times are lower for the hybrid. That's a
good achievement and congrats to you on that.
I'm not convinced of the benefit of the hybrid
Remy Maucherat wrote:
In my mind, the argument for tomcat supporting 1000 concurrent
connections for an extended period of time isn't valid from my
experience.
- all the other APR features which are really useful and not provided by
the core Java platform
Actually I just read a perfect
Mladen Turk wrote:
Actually I just read a perfect use case scenario request for
the new APR connector on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
With only couple of threads all the 1000 connections could be handled
without having 1000 threads.
Actually, it seems a lot more a case of using the servlet API in a way
Hi Peter,
I took a look at the AB and Rubis numbers. Honestly I don't
understand the rubis graphs.
You can find an explanation about the httperf numbers on the man page
of Httperf, or looking at
http://www.hpl.hp.com/personal/David_Mosberger/httperf.html.
Rubis is the dynamic application
Hi,
By the way, this is my last post about this topic. I've perfectly
understood Remy's messages (in the list and in my personal address),
so I will not waste your time anymore.
It was far from a waste of time. Please don't hesitate to contribute again
in performance tuning or other areas.
Hi,
I've repeated the tests on the hybrid architecture using the AB.
You can find them attached to this mail. I've run the AB with several
concurrency levels, ranging from 20 to 1. You can see all the
results in a plot.
Running a test with ab (ab -k -c 20 -n 2
Vicenc Beltran Querol wrote:
Hi,
I've repeated the tests on the hybrid architecture using the AB.
You can find them attached to this mail. I've run the AB with several
concurrency levels, ranging from 20 to 1. You can see all the
results in a plot.
-c 20 -k is basically the only thing I
Remy Maucherat wrote:
I've repeated the tests on the hybrid architecture using the AB.
You can find them attached to this mail. I've run the AB with several
concurrency levels, ranging from 20 to 1. You can see all the
results in a plot.
Here are the results.
Rémy
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Remy Maucherat wrote:
I've repeated the tests on the hybrid architecture using the AB.
You can find them attached to this mail. I've run the AB with several
concurrency levels, ranging from 20 to 1. You can see all the
results in a plot.
Here are the results.
On Fri, May 20, 2005 at 12:05:51PM +0200, Mladen Turk wrote:
Vicenç Beltran wrote:
Hi,
attached you'll find a patch that changes the coyote multithreading
model to a hybrid threading model (NIO+Mulithread). It's fully
compatible with the existing Catalina code and is SSL enabled.
diff
from http://www.bsc.es/edragon/pdf/TestSurge.tgz
As a summary, the throughput improvement I've observed is about a 25%, without
breaking the response time. You can see all the results (original, patched and
comparison) in the above file.
I'm finishing the Dynamic content (plain and SSL
Hi,
attached you'll find a patch that changes the coyote multithreading
model to a hybrid threading model (NIO+Mulithread). It's fully
compatible with the existing Catalina code and is SSL enabled.
The Hybrid model breaks the limitation of one thread per connection,
thus you can have a higher
Vicenç Beltran wrote:
Hi,
attached you'll find a patch that changes the coyote multithreading
model to a hybrid threading model (NIO+Mulithread). It's fully
compatible with the existing Catalina code and is SSL enabled.
diff -uprN
jakarta-tomcat-5.5.9-src/jakarta-tomcat-connectors/http11/src
Vicenç Beltran wrote:
Hi,
attached you'll find a patch that changes the coyote multithreading
model to a hybrid threading model (NIO+Mulithread). It's fully
compatible with the existing Catalina code and is SSL enabled.
The Hybrid model breaks the limitation of one thread per connection,
thus
Mladen Turk wrote:
Vicenç Beltran wrote:
Can't you simply make two new files
Http11NioProcessor and Http11NioProtocol.
It definitely needs to be a (clean, this means no multiple /* */ in
patch submissions ;) ) separate implementation. Actually it will also
need a separate NioEndpoint (I would
Hi guys,
I'm not trying to be a Tomcat developer. I'm working on my PhD on web
performance and just decided to share with you the experimental code I've
developed after studying the performance obtained ;).
Anyway, it's OK. I'll work on the new patch and resubmit it.
Thanks for the comments,
Vicenc Beltran Querol wrote:
Hi guys,
I'm not trying to be a Tomcat developer. I'm working on my PhD on web
performance and just decided to share with you the experimental code I've
developed after studying the performance obtained ;).
I've done some serious testings with HTTP server and NIO.
Mladen Turk wrote:
Vicenc Beltran Querol wrote:
Hi guys,
I'm not trying to be a Tomcat developer. I'm working on my PhD on web
performance and just decided to share with you the experimental code
I've developed after studying the performance obtained ;).
I've done some serious testings with
Jeanfrancois Arcand wrote:
I disagree ;-) I would like to see your implementation, because from
what I'm seeing/measuring, it is completely the inverse. I would be
interested to see how you did implement your NIO connector. The problem
with HTTP is not NIO, but the strategy to use for
- Original Message -
From: Jeanfrancois Arcand [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Developers List tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org
Sent: Friday, May 20, 2005 6:56 AM
Subject: Re: Hybrid (NIO+Multithread, SSL enabled) architecture for Coyote
Mladen Turk wrote:
Vicenc Beltran Querol wrote:
Hi
I'm not a committer, but I think evidence proves that native sockets +
JNI is the way to go. To my knowledge, weblogic, websphere and Resin
all use native sockets. having a pure Java approach sounds nice and
all, but in the edge cases where high concurrent connection is needed,
I much rather go
Jeanfrancois Arcand wrote:
I've done some serious testings with HTTP server and NIO.
The results were always bad for NIO.
Blocking I/O is minimum 25% faster then NIO.
Faster in what? Throughput and/or scalability?
I disagree ;-) I would like to see your implementation, because from
what I'm
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Jeanfrancois Arcand wrote:
I disagree ;-) I would like to see your implementation, because from
what I'm seeing/measuring, it is completely the inverse. I would be
interested to see how you did implement your NIO connector. The
problem with HTTP is not NIO, but the
Mladen Turk wrote:
Jeanfrancois Arcand wrote:
I've done some serious testings with HTTP server and NIO.
The results were always bad for NIO.
Blocking I/O is minimum 25% faster then NIO.
Faster in what? Throughput and/or scalability?
I disagree ;-) I would like to see your implementation, because
Jeanfrancois Arcand wrote:
Well, the strategy you use is important. If you can predict the size of
the stream (by let say discovering the content-length), you can make
uploading task as fast as with blocking IO (OK, maybe a little slower
since you parse the header, and the channel may not reads
I want all my Tomcat requests to go through SSL.
I want the URLs to look like https://this/ and not https://this:8443
I setup tomcat, and got ssl working on 8443.
But I cannot redirect port 80 to 8443. I keep getting 'access denied'.
Is there a way in Tomcat to redirect all port 80
This is a question for tomcat-user, not tomcat-dev
Mark
Donny R Rota wrote:
I want all my Tomcat requests to go through SSL.
I want the URLs to look like https://this/ and not https://this:8443
I setup tomcat, and got ssl working on 8443.
But I cannot redirect port 80 to 8443. I keep
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dev Team,
Attached is a patch to address the Tomcat 5.X inability to specify a
secure proxy without an SSL connection. The goal is to specify
secure=true, scheme=https, proxyPort=443, and
proxyName=ssl-accelerator.domain.com on a plain HTTP Connector in
server.xml.
BTW
Dev Team,
Attached is a patch to address the Tomcat 5.X inability to specify a
secure proxy without an SSL connection. The goal is to specify
secure=true, scheme=https, proxyPort=443, and
proxyName=ssl-accelerator.domain.com on a plain HTTP Connector in
server.xml. I am not sure
Dev Team,
Attached is a patch to address the Tomcat 5.X inability to specify a
secure proxy without an SSL connection. The goal is to specify
secure=true, scheme=https, proxyPort=443, and
proxyName=ssl-accelerator.domain.com on a plain HTTP Connector in
server.xml. I am not sure
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33883.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
yoavs 2005/03/23 08:31:41
Modified:webapps/docs changelog.xml ssl-howto.xml
Log:
Bugzilla 33883.
Revision ChangesPath
1.253 +3 -0 jakarta-tomcat-catalina/webapps/docs/changelog.xml
Index: changelog.xml
Bruce, thanks for response.
I know java has problem. Tomcat is here because I would like to have
tomcat with SSL (with rsa key 4096 length support).
I installed unlimited JCE strength and problem stil exist.
Can anyone confirm does Java 1.4 support 4096 RSA key size or only 2048.
Best regards
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22701.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
and have SSL
with client authentication(client has certificate issued by CA which has
certificate with public key length of 4096 bit)?
Java 1.4 doesn't support rsa key size of 4096 (only to 2084). With
keytool you aren't able to import certificate(4096) to cacerts. I
instaled BouncyCastle
allready sent this question in user mail group, but there was no
response, so I try lucky here. I would be happy if some expert or some
who allready solved this problem, give me answer or hint about this.
Repeted qouestion:
is it possible to have tomcat 4.1.x running with jdk1.4.2 and have SSL
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22701.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
1.4.0_02-b02)
Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 1.4.0_02-b02, mixed mode)
Tomcat Version Tomcat/4.1.18-LE-jdk14
Log4J version log4j-1.2.7.jar
Struts version 1.1
NOTE: I haven't configured any SSL connector
Although I have the following configuration under Standalone
/show_bug.cgi?id=33883
Summary: openssl pkcs12 -infile/-outfile bad options in SSL
Configuration HOW-TO example
Product: Tomcat 5
Version: Unknown
Platform: All
URL: http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-5.5-doc/ssl
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33413.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
/show_bug.cgi?id=33413
Summary: problem accessing ssl website...
Product: Tomcat 4
Version: 4.1.7
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Windows XP
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: Connector:Coyote HTTP/1.1
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33413.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33413.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
yoavs 2005/02/01 13:04:30
Modified:webapps/docs Tag: TOMCAT_5_0 changelog.xml ssl-howto.xml
Log:
Bugzilla 33204.
Revision ChangesPath
No revision
No revision
1.70.2.92 +3 -0 jakarta-tomcat-catalina/webapps/docs/changelog.xml
yoavs 2005/02/01 13:07:29
Modified:webapps/docs changelog.xml ssl-howto.xml
Log:
Bugzilla 33204.
Revision ChangesPath
1.230 +8 -0 jakarta-tomcat-catalina/webapps/docs/changelog.xml
Index: changelog.xml
Current JNDIRealm does not support ldap with SSL and it's not a good
idea to use simple authentication on production. I have raised this
issue on discussion threads in the past, but never seem to get an
answer from anybody, probably because genral users were not really
familiar with the issue
01:23 ---
good practice for such a anti-session-hijacking/anti-cross-site scripting is to
implement a 2 out of 3 approach: i.e. SSL-session ID, remote IP and user-agent
are compared between each http request and only if 2 out of 3 remain the same,
the login-status is maintained. Not 3 out of 3
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9702.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9702.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hi ALL,
I need a help..
I have to implement SSL b/w two components one is Server and another is
Agent...i have to authenticate both the server and the agent before
communication between them ..
i have implemented the SSL b/w GUI and Server ...where i have to only
authenticate
Fuck u and never mail me again.
Rohit Kumar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi ALL,
I need a help..
I have to implement SSL b/w two components one is Server and another is
Agent...i have to authenticate both the server and the agent before
communication between them ..
i have implemented
yoavs 2004/11/18 06:51:35
Modified:webapps/docs changelog.xml ssl-howto.xml
Log:
Bugzilla 22679: misc addition to SSL HowTo.
Revision ChangesPath
1.171 +3 -0 jakarta-tomcat-catalina/webapps/docs/changelog.xml
Index: changelog.xml
yoavs 2004/11/18 07:01:03
Modified:webapps/docs Tag: TOMCAT_5_0 changelog.xml ssl-howto.xml
Log:
Bugzilla 22678: misc addition to SSL HowTo
Revision ChangesPath
No revision
No revision
1.70.2.74 +3 -1 jakarta-tomcat-catalina
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22679.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
/show_bug.cgi?id=22679
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|how to access ssl session ID|how to access ssl session ID
|out of tomcat to prevent
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29695.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32112.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
I am running IIS 6.0 with Tomcat 5.0 on Windows Server 2003, and I am having
a problem getting SSL to work. The following instructions are a portion of
the article titled TOMCAT and SSL, and I have a questions about Do:
keytool -genkey -alias tomcat -keyalg RSA.
Where is this command typed
/show_bug.cgi?id=32112
SSL configuration attributes / security issue
Summary: SSL configuration attributes / security issue
Product: Tomcat 5
Version: Unknown
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: Enhancement
/show_bug.cgi?id=29907
connector without accept thread (was: hanging during SSL negotiation)
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-11-07 09:48 ---
the same appears to have happened also with
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-324
1 - 100 of 654 matches
Mail list logo
