Remy Maucherat wrote:
On Wed, 26 Sep 2001, Dave Oxley wrote:
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2001 22:59:55 +0100
From: Dave Oxley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Tomcat next
Hi all,
A couple of questions on future Tomcat releases
Hi all,
A couple of questions on future Tomcat releases:
1. Will there be a TC3.4 release or is 3.x obsolete after 3.3?
2. Has TC4.0 been branched (i.e. has development started on TC4.1 or are you
waiting for TC4.0.1 to branch?)
3. Is there a list of planned features for TC4.1?
Dave
[EMAIL
On Wed, 26 Sep 2001, Dave Oxley wrote:
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2001 22:59:55 +0100
From: Dave Oxley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Tomcat next
Hi all,
A couple of questions on future Tomcat releases:
1. Will there be a TC3.4 release or is 3.x
On Wed, 26 Sep 2001, Dave Oxley wrote:
Hi all,
A couple of questions on future Tomcat releases:
1. Will there be a TC3.4 release or is 3.x obsolete after 3.3?
AFAIK there is no plan for a 3.4 release after 3.3 - that doesn't mean 3.x
will be obsolete, just that the core is now stable and
On Wed, 26 Sep 2001, Craig R. McClanahan wrote:
What would *you* like to see happen? (And what would
*you* like to work on to make it happen? :-).
did you see my message about virtual host support for
authenticators and realms? :)
i will likely be able to put some time into it in the near
On Wed, 26 Sep 2001, Dave Oxley wrote:
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2001 22:59:55 +0100
From: Dave Oxley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Tomcat next
Hi all,
A couple of questions on future Tomcat releases:
1. Will there be a TC3.4 release
On Wed, 26 Sep 2001, Remy Maucherat wrote:
What would *you* like to see happen? (And what would *you* like to work
on to make it happen? :-).
Cleaning up and modularizing the current 4.0 is probably the most
important thing to happen before any more features are added, and that's
what I
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Having a stable core is essential for module development and for enhancing
the current set of modules. Even if there are many improvements we can add
to 3.3, I believe the benefit of keeping 3.3 stable is far bigger.
Just to confirm this point, I've been running 3.3
AFAIK there is no plan for a 3.4 release after 3.3 - that doesn't mean 3.x
will be obsolete, just that the core is now stable and unlikely to
change, except bugfixes.
Having a stable core is essential for module development and for enhancing
the current set of modules. Even if there are
Craig R. McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Implementing a nice administration/configuration interface (as a
web app), talking to server components through a JMX interface
(so that Tomcat can be managed by any JMX compliant tool). Some
time ago I published some functional requirements
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It is not yet decided how we'll release the new modules, but the main
idea is to keep the 'base' version as small and clean as possible, and
all features to be 'add-ons', outside of the base distribution, and have
only bug fixes in 3.3.x-releases.
Remy Maucherat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Actually, I would be more in favor of releasing a 4.1 before that, focusing
mostly on small refactorings of the core (like the error report refactoring
I just did) and optimizations.
More specifically, that would include:
- the Service stuff (if
12 matches
Mail list logo
