costin 2005/09/29 07:36:25
Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/startup
CatalinaProperties.java
Log:
Busted by the tab police, fixed the settings.
Revision ChangesPath
1.10 +4 -4
jakarta-tomcat-catalina/catalina/src/share/org
remm2004/07/23 15:42:16
Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/startup
CatalinaProperties.java
Log:
- enum -> enumeration (JDK 1.5 update).
Revision ChangesPath
1.7 +4 -4
jakarta-tomcat-catalina/catalina/src/share/org/apach
jfarcand2004/05/18 09:33:24
Modified:catalina/src/conf catalina.properties
catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/startup
CatalinaProperties.java
Log:
Make catalina.properties file configurable from catalina.base as well as
catalina.home. Somet
remm2003/11/13 08:37:06
Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/startup
CatalinaProperties.java
Log:
- Convinience feature: set as system property everything in that file.
- This could work well along with the property replacement to be added in
Jan Luehe wrote:
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Jan Luehe wrote:
Remy Maucherat wrote:
OK, in this case, I'll add that part of the patch back in, without
the CatalinaProperties.setProperty, which I'll keep as a private
extension for now.
I meant the hardcoded list that you put in TldConfig. I don't thi
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Jan Luehe wrote:
Remy Maucherat wrote:
As for a solution, I believe your hardcoded list was acceptable, if
not completely optimal.
OK, in this case, I'll add that part of the patch back in, without the
CatalinaProperties.setProperty, which I'll keep as a private extensio
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Jan Luehe wrote:
Remy Maucherat wrote:
As for a solution, I believe your hardcoded list was acceptable, if
not completely optimal.
OK, in this case, I'll add that part of the patch back in, without the
CatalinaProperties.setProperty, which I'll keep as a private extensio
Jan Luehe wrote:
Remy Maucherat wrote:
As for a solution, I believe your hardcoded list was acceptable, if
not completely optimal.
OK, in this case, I'll add that part of the patch back in, without the
CatalinaProperties.setProperty, which I'll keep as a private extension
for now.
I meant the h
Remy Maucherat wrote:
OK, I'll revert my patch (and leave it as a private extension), until
we have found a better solution that everybody agrees on.
Thanks :)
As for a solution, I believe your hardcoded list was acceptable, if not
completely optimal.
OK, in this case, I'll add that part of t
Jan Luehe wrote:
Remy,
I leave the judgement up to the community.
I'll have to reiterate my -1.
OK, I'll revert my patch (and leave it as a private extension), until we
have found a better solution that everybody agrees on.
Thanks :)
As for a solution, I believe your hardcoded list was acceptab
Remy,
As I mentioned in my private email to you, it may not always be
practical to rely on the list of "noTldJars" configured in
catalina.properties if you bundle Tomcat with your own product. That's
why I added the setProperty method on CatalinaProperties, in order
to be able to override the valu
Craig R. McClanahan wrote:
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Jan Luehe wrote:
good point. What about environments that embed Tomcat without following
Tomcat's directory layout, and in which the classloader
hierachy/depth is different from that in Tomcat?
I honestly don't understand why we're searching paren
Jan Luehe wrote:
Remy,
sorry, but I don't see which part of our email exchange you found
"very frustrating". As I said, I'm open to suggestions, and if my
patch is deemed useless, I'll revert it. No problem.
I've done some measurements on my Ultra 60. TldConfig already
calculates the tldScanTime
Hans Bergsten wrote:
Jan Luehe wrote:
I think it depends on whether you anticipate (or support)
LiteWebServer being bundled (as one or more libraries) into other
products that use a different directory layout, with different
locations for shared libs. If that's the case, limiting the location
Jan Luehe wrote:
Hans,
good point. What about environments that embed Tomcat without following
Tomcat's directory layout, and in which the classloader
hierachy/depth is different from that in Tomcat?
I don't give them that option (with regards to this) in LiteWebServer.
The only place I look fo
Hans,
good point. What about environments that embed Tomcat without following
Tomcat's directory layout, and in which the classloader hierachy/depth
is different from that in Tomcat?
I don't give them that option (with regards to this) in LiteWebServer.
The only place I look for shared librarie
Jan Luehe wrote:
Hans,
thanks for stepping in.
sorry, but I don't see which part of our email exchange you found
"very frustrating". As I said, I'm open to suggestions, and if my
patch is deemed useless, I'll revert it. No problem.
[...]
Sorry for not jumping in earlier in this discussion.
Whe
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Jan Luehe wrote:
good point. What about environments that embed Tomcat without following
Tomcat's directory layout, and in which the classloader
hierachy/depth is different from that in Tomcat?
I honestly don't understand why we're searching parent classloaders
for TLDs.
Jan Luehe wrote:
good point. What about environments that embed Tomcat without following
Tomcat's directory layout, and in which the classloader hierachy/depth
is different from that in Tomcat?
I honestly don't understand why we're searching parent classloaders for
TLDs.
Remy
Hans,
thanks for stepping in.
sorry, but I don't see which part of our email exchange you found
"very frustrating". As I said, I'm open to suggestions, and if my
patch is deemed useless, I'll revert it. No problem.
[...]
Sorry for not jumping in earlier in this discussion.
When I implemented t
Jan Luehe wrote:
Remy,
sorry, but I don't see which part of our email exchange you found
"very frustrating". As I said, I'm open to suggestions, and if my
patch is deemed useless, I'll revert it. No problem.
[...]
Sorry for not jumping in earlier in this discussion.
When I implemented the "shared
Remy,
sorry, but I don't see which part of our email exchange you found
"very frustrating". As I said, I'm open to suggestions, and if my
patch is deemed useless, I'll revert it. No problem.
I've done some measurements on my Ultra 60. TldConfig already
calculates the tldScanTime for each context,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
luehe 2003/09/24 12:09:29
Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/startup
CatalinaProperties.java
Log:
Added setProperty method.
For example, this will allow the value for the "noTldJars" property to
be determined and
luehe 2003/09/24 12:09:29
Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/startup
CatalinaProperties.java
Log:
Added setProperty method.
For example, this will allow the value for the "noTldJars" property to
be determined and set dynamically.
Rev
24 matches
Mail list logo
