Henri Gomez wrote:
Glenn Nielsen wrote:
Henri,
It is hard to say. It all depends on how changing jk hook
priorities impact other apache modules. I am convinced that
the best solution for this will not be found until we have
an extensive test suite to test use of mod_jk 1/2 with other
jean-frederic clere wrote:
Henri Gomez wrote:
Glenn Nielsen wrote:
Henri,
It is hard to say. It all depends on how changing jk hook
priorities impact other apache modules. I am convinced that
the best solution for this will not be found until we have
an extensive test suite to test use of
Henri Gomez wrote:
jean-frederic clere wrote:
Henri Gomez wrote:
Glenn Nielsen wrote:
Henri,
It is hard to say. It all depends on how changing jk hook
priorities impact other apache modules. I am convinced that
the best solution for this will not be found until we have
an extensive
jean-frederic clere wrote:
Henri Gomez wrote:
jean-frederic clere wrote:
Henri Gomez wrote:
Glenn Nielsen wrote:
Henri,
It is hard to say. It all depends on how changing jk hook
priorities impact other apache modules. I am convinced that
the best solution for this will not be found
Ok, you are rigth. In a few minutes will be ready.
Regards,
Ramon
jean-frederic clere wrote:
Henri Gomez wrote:
jean-frederic clere wrote:
Henri Gomez wrote:
Glenn Nielsen wrote:
Henri,
It is hard to say. It all depends on how changing jk hook
priorities impact other
Sorry, it was an error answering this email
Ramon Pons wrote:
Ok, you are rigth. In a few minutes will be ready.
Regards,
Ramon
jean-frederic clere wrote:
Henri Gomez wrote:
jean-frederic clere wrote:
Henri Gomez wrote:
Glenn Nielsen wrote:
Henri,
It is hard to say.
jean-frederic clere wrote:
Henri Gomez wrote:
jean-frederic clere wrote:
Henri Gomez wrote:
Glenn Nielsen wrote:
Henri,
It is hard to say. It all depends on how changing jk hook
priorities impact other apache modules. I am convinced that
the best solution for this will not be found
jean-frederic clere wrote:
jean-frederic clere wrote:
Henri Gomez wrote:
jean-frederic clere wrote:
Henri Gomez wrote:
Glenn Nielsen wrote:
Henri,
It is hard to say. It all depends on how changing jk hook
priorities impact other apache modules. I am convinced that
the best solution
Henri Gomez wrote:
jean-frederic clere wrote:
jean-frederic clere wrote:
Henri Gomez wrote:
jean-frederic clere wrote:
Henri Gomez wrote:
Glenn Nielsen wrote:
Henri,
It is hard to say. It all depends on how changing jk hook
priorities impact other apache modules. I am
Hi Glenn and others :)
I see in jk that we're using :
ap_hook_translate_name(jk_translate,NULL,NULL,APR_HOOK_MIDDLE);
and now in jk2 :
static const char * const aszPre[] = { mod_rewrite.c, NULL };
ap_hook_translate_name(jk2_translate, aszPre, NULL, APR_HOOK_FIRST);
What do you think of it ?
Henri Gomez wrote:
Hi Glenn and others :)
I see in jk that we're using :
ap_hook_translate_name(jk_translate,NULL,NULL,APR_HOOK_MIDDLE);
and now in jk2 :
static const char * const aszPre[] = { mod_rewrite.c, NULL };
ap_hook_translate_name(jk2_translate, aszPre, NULL, APR_HOOK_FIRST);
Henri,
It is hard to say. It all depends on how changing jk hook
priorities impact other apache modules. I am convinced that
the best solution for this will not be found until we have
an extensive test suite to test use of mod_jk 1/2 with other
modules. So if a change is made we can make sure
Glenn Nielsen wrote:
Henri,
It is hard to say. It all depends on how changing jk hook
priorities impact other apache modules. I am convinced that
the best solution for this will not be found until we have
an extensive test suite to test use of mod_jk 1/2 with other
modules. So if a change is
Glenn Nielsen wrote:
Henri,
It is hard to say. It all depends on how changing jk hook
priorities impact other apache modules. I am convinced that
the best solution for this will not be found until we have
an extensive test suite to test use of mod_jk 1/2 with other
modules. So if a change is
14 matches
Mail list logo
