/show_bug.cgi?id=35249
Summary: mod_jk2 modifies chunked post requests
Product: Tomcat 5
Version: Unknown
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: Native:JK
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35249.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Was there a reason mod_jk2 was replaced with mod_jk? I found mod_jk2
much easier to use and it's a pity it's gone. Is it just looking for a
maintainer?
Were there advantages of mod_jk2 over mod_jk?
Alistair
-
To unsubscribe, e
Alistair Young wrote:
Was there a reason mod_jk2 was replaced with mod_jk?
Too complex, uses APR that behaves badly with Apache1.3,
and lot more. Browse the mail archive for further details.
I found mod_jk2
much easier to use and it's a pity it's gone.
No it is not, but that's kind of personal
ok, that's enlightening!
many thanks,
Alistair
On 17 Mar 2005, at 10:13, Mladen Turk wrote:
Alistair Young wrote:
Was there a reason mod_jk2 was replaced with mod_jk?
Too complex, uses APR that behaves badly with Apache1.3,
and lot more. Browse the mail archive for further details.
I found mod_jk2
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21766.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22045.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22114.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27851.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28790.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27884.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28823.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
/show_bug.cgi?id=16901
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-12-03 19:08 ---
Is there a reason that the latest version of jk_service_apache2.c doesn't use
the ap_get_server_port() function? When I use a modified version of mod_jk2
that uses this function, the correct value
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16901.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16901.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16901.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18472.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19965.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20689.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hi,
When (if) do we close them as WONTFIX?
Yoav Shapira http://www.yoavshapira.com
This e-mail, including any attachments, is a confidential business
communication, and may contain information that is confidential, proprietary
and/or privileged. This e-mail is intended only for the
+1 as WONTFIX. Proposed text ...
As of November 15, 2004, JK2 is no longer supported. All bugs related to JK2
will be marked as WONTFIX. In its place, some of its features have been
backported to jk1. Most of those features will be seen in 2.0.7. (Actual
release date is unknown as of this
Tim Funk wrote:
+1 as WONTFIX. Proposed text ...
As of November 15, 2004, JK2 is no longer supported. All bugs related
to JK2 will be marked as WONTFIX. In its place, some of its features
have been backported to jk1. Most of those features will be seen in
2.0.7. (Actual release date is unknown
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30539.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31938.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28516.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29710.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
List
Subject: Re: mod_jk2 issues in Bugzilla
Tim Funk wrote:
+1 as WONTFIX. Proposed text ...
As of November 15, 2004, JK2 is no longer supported. All bugs
related
to JK2 will be marked as WONTFIX. In its place, some of its features
have been backported to jk1. Most of those features will be seen
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19298.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29989.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29989.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15278.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15278.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15278.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30539.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28016.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
/connectors-doc/jk2/index.html, which says,
among others, that JK2 is a refactoring of JK and is much more powerfull.
I've been fooled by that, and spent a long time getting mod_jk2 to work. Would
be better to avoid the same mistake to others.
I guess that bug report has no point anymore, and can
/show_bug.cgi?id=31938
Apache2 + mod_jk2 on FreeBSD - default socket timeout
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|Other |Medium
/show_bug.cgi?id=28790
connection reset by peer and ajp13.service() ajpGetReply recoverable error 3
mod_jk2
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-11-05 18:37 ---
We are having the same error with Linux and JBoss 3.2.5
mod_jk: Error flushing
[Fri Nov 05 11:21:31 2004] [error
/show_bug.cgi?id=30774
mod_jk2: It is not possible to set the AJP port to anything other than the default of
8009
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
/show_bug.cgi?id=31938
Apache2 + mod_jk2 on FreeBSD - default socket timeout
Summary: Apache2 + mod_jk2 on FreeBSD - default socket timeout
Product: Tomcat 5
Version: 5.0.0
Platform: PC
OS/Version: FreeBSD
Status: NEW
Severity: Major
Hi there,
I've got a problem with mod_jk2 and Apache2 under FreeBSD 5.x and I think it
is a bug. I configured mod_jk2 for two Tomcat 5.0 servers. If one of these
machines is down (unplugging the network cable), mod_jk2 should send all
requests to the server that kept running. That is working 90
/show_bug.cgi?id=30774
mod_jk2: It is not possible to set the AJP port to anything other than the default of
8009
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-08 23:23 ---
I think the problem is not that you can only use 8009, but ports 32767 don't
work because of bug 17579. I
/show_bug.cgi?id=29949
mod_jk2 ajp13 problem
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution
/show_bug.cgi?id=30116
building mod_jk2
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution
[Sun Aug 22 20:09:23 2004] [error] ajp13.service() Error forwarding
ajp13:/opt/tomcat/work/jk2.socket 1 0
[Sun Aug 22 20:09:23 2004] [error] mod_jk2.handler() Error connecting to tomcat 3,
status 200
on Apache/2.0.49 + mod_jk2/2.0.5-dev + Tomcat/5.0.27 under Linux.
I've found the following lines
After installing mod_jk to test my server under a productions system, I
found
that if the URI contains a %2f in the URL path, mod_jk2, or possibly
Apache,
ignores the URI mapping to the Web Application Server (Tomcat 4.1.30)
Note: I am using the latest source release of mod_jk2, Apache 2.0.50
2004] [error] ajp13.service() Error forwarding
ajp13:/opt/tomcat/work/jk2.socket 1 0
[Sun Aug 22 20:09:23 2004] [error] mod_jk2.handler() Error connecting to tomcat 3,
status 200
on Apache/2.0.49 + mod_jk2/2.0.5-dev + Tomcat/5.0.27 under Linux.
I've found the following lines in JK sources
/show_bug.cgi?id=30774
mod_jk2: It is not possible to set the AJP port to anything other than the default of
8009
Summary: mod_jk2: It is not possible to set the AJP port to
anything other than the default of 8009
Product: Tomcat 5
Version: 5.0.27
/show_bug.cgi?id=28790
connection reset by peer and ajp13.service() ajpGetReply recoverable error 3
mod_jk2
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|connection reset
/show_bug.cgi?id=30539
possible security hole: mod_jk2 bypassed when client issues Host: header with an
invalid port number
Summary: possible security hole: mod_jk2 bypassed when client
issues Host: header with an invalid port number
Product: Tomcat 5
/show_bug.cgi?id=30539
possible security hole: mod_jk2 bypassed when client issues Host: header with an
invalid port number
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-08-09 13:46 ---
For the record, the issue has been discovered by Paweł Sawicki
([EMAIL PROTECTED
/show_bug.cgi?id=15278
[PATCH] mod_jk2 for IIS, Bugfix corrupted data ]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED
/show_bug.cgi?id=15278
[PATCH] mod_jk2 for IIS, Bugfix corrupted data ]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
/show_bug.cgi?id=30116
building mod_jk2
Summary: building mod_jk2
Product: Tomcat 5
Version: 5.0.25
Platform: Other
OS/Version: Other
Status: NEW
Severity: Normal
Priority: Other
Component: Connector:AJP
/show_bug.cgi?id=29989
jni of mod_jk2 doesn't work for win32 at all
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution
/show_bug.cgi?id=13419
Weird seg fault on Mac OS X for mod_jk2 + Apache2
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
/show_bug.cgi?id=28559
mod_jk2 2.0.4 compiler error on Redhat Enterprise Linux 3.0, Apache 2.0.46
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
/show_bug.cgi?id=29989
jni of mod_jk2 doesn't work for win32 at all
Summary: jni of mod_jk2 doesn't work for win32 at all
Product: Tomcat 5
Version: 5.0.0
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Windows NT/2K
Status: NEW
Severity: Blocker
/show_bug.cgi?id=29949
mod_jk2 ajp13 problem
Summary: mod_jk2 ajp13 problem
Product: Tomcat 5
Version: 5.0.25
Platform: Other
OS/Version: Other
Status: NEW
Severity: Major
Priority: Other
Component: Native:JK
jfclere 2004/07/06 08:56:42
Modified:jk/native2/common jk_endpoint.c jk_logger_win32.c
jk_requtil.c
jk/native2/server/apache2 mod_jk2.c
Log:
Use apr equivalent routine for snprintf, usleep and vsnprintf.
Revision ChangesPath
1.29
/show_bug.cgi?id=15278
[PATCH] mod_jk2 for IIS, Bugfix corrupted data ]
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-07-05 13:51 ---
Does anyone know whether this bug really is fixed? I've got a client who's
having a problem with the IIS redirector that sounds exactly like this bug. I
Boulogne Billancourt,
Madame, Monsieur,
Nous avons bien reu votre offre de collaboration et vous remercions de la
confiance que vous nous tmoignez en nous associant votre dmarche.
Elle sera tudie attentivement par le consultant en charge du poste
pourvoir.
Sans rponse de notre
/show_bug.cgi?id=29710
mod_jk2: default *.properties location isn't `apxs -q sysconfdir`
Summary: mod_jk2: default *.properties location isn't `apxs -q
sysconfdir`
Product: Tomcat 5
Version: 5.0.25
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Other
mod_jk2 searches for '*.properties' in `apxs -q prefix`/conf instead of
`apxs -q sysconfdir`.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
/show_bug.cgi?id=19298
mod_jk2 and Apache2 broken autoindex
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|Connector:Coyote JK 2 |Native:JK
Product|Tomcat
yoavs 2004/06/16 07:38:56
Modified:jk/native2/server/apache2 mod_jk2.c
Log:
Bugzilla 26231 done.
Revision ChangesPath
1.83 +20 -5 jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native2/server/apache2/mod_jk2.c
Index: mod_jk2.c
keith 2004/06/16 08:42:03
Modified:jk/native2/server/apache2 mod_jk2.c
Log:
The patch that was just applied for a bug was against an older
version and referred to a nonexistant variable.
Revision ChangesPath
1.84 +2 -2 jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native2
/show_bug.cgi?id=15278
[PATCH] mod_jk2 for IIS, Bugfix corrupted data ]
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-06-03 14:38 ---
I have tested the version posted
http://jakarta.apache.org/~mturk/isapi_redirector2.zip
and it works fine, tried it from the machines that was working
/show_bug.cgi?id=19298
mod_jk2 and Apache2 broken autoindex
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-06-03 21:25 ---
same problem here
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail
/show_bug.cgi?id=16901
[PATCH] mod_jk2 wrong server port when using NAT
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
/show_bug.cgi?id=15278
[PATCH] mod_jk2 for IIS, Bugfix corrupted data ]
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-06-02 21:31 ---
Successful test:
IIS 5
Windows 2000 Server
Tomcat 5.0.25
JDK 1.4.2_04
Isapi redirector from: http://jakarta.apache.org/~mturk/isapi_redirector2.zip
/show_bug.cgi?id=28559
mod_jk2 2.0.4 compiler error on Redhat Enterprise Linux 3.0, Apache 2.0.46
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-05-19 11:35 ---
Created an attachment (id=11595)
Patch to fix mod_jk2 build
/show_bug.cgi?id=19298
mod_jk2 and Apache2 broken autoindex
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-05-10 16:42 ---
I'm also seeing this problem.
Is there any idea on when this will be added/corrected?
How about any CVS code that resolves the problem?
Thanks
/show_bug.cgi?id=28559
mod_jk2 2.0.4 compiler error on Redhat Enterprise Linux 3.0, Apache 2.0.46
Summary: mod_jk2 2.0.4 compiler error on Redhat Enterprise Linux
3.0, Apache 2.0.46
Product: Tomcat 4
Version: 4.1.29
Platform: PC
OS
/show_bug.cgi?id=28516
getRemoteUser() not working with mod_jk2 2.0.4
Summary: getRemoteUser() not working with mod_jk2 2.0.4
Product: Tomcat 5
Version: 5.0.19
Platform: Other
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: Major
/show_bug.cgi?id=28516
getRemoteUser() not working with mod_jk2 2.0.4
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-04-21 17:32 ---
When auth directives are in Directory / then getRemoteUser() doesn't work.
When auth directives are in Location /webapp then getRemoteUser() works.
Since I
/show_bug.cgi?id=28016
mod_jk2 2.0.4 does not work with existing configuration
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|Normal |Major
/show_bug.cgi?id=28016
mod_jk2 2.0.4 does not work with existing configuration
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|Major |Normal
/show_bug.cgi?id=19298
mod_jk2 and Apache2 broken autoindex
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|Normal |Enhancement
--- Additional
/show_bug.cgi?id=15278
[PATCH] mod_jk2 for IIS, Bugfix corrupted data ]
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-04-06 17:20 ---
Hi Mladen,
That build seems to work for me; thanks for posting it!
The systems I tested it with were:
-w2k machines
-IIS v5.xxx
-Tomcat 4.1.29
-J2sdk
/show_bug.cgi?id=15278
[PATCH] mod_jk2 for IIS, Bugfix corrupted data ]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
/show_bug.cgi?id=15278
[PATCH] mod_jk2 for IIS, Bugfix corrupted data ]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|ASSIGNED
/show_bug.cgi?id=15278
[PATCH] mod_jk2 for IIS, Bugfix corrupted data ]
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-04-03 06:28 ---
Yes i will be willing to help with the test. I can install the version on the
dev server which is IIS 5.0 with TC 5.0 and W2K and use these same machines
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yes i will be willing to help with
the test. I can install the version on the dev server which
is IIS 5.0 with TC 5.0 and W2K and use these same machines to
do the test.
As of the email issue, I am subscribed but i get way too many
emails i can't read them
/show_bug.cgi?id=15278
[PATCH] mod_jk2 for IIS, Bugfix corrupted data ]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
/show_bug.cgi?id=15278
[PATCH] mod_jk2 for IIS, Bugfix corrupted data ]
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-04-02 23:31 ---
Just wanted to add, that the test on the previous post was done on both IIS
5.0 on a W2K Sp4 and IIS 6.0 on a W2K3 server. The test failed on both cases
/show_bug.cgi?id=28016
mod_jk2 2.0.4 does not work with existing configuration
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-04-01 09:22 ---
I'm behind a restrictive firewall, so I can't access CVS directly.
I downloaded this snapshot:
http://cvs.apache.org/snapshots/jakarta-tomcat
I also tried this and everything worked nicely.
NormW wrote:
Good morning All.
Just tried Jean's recent change to mod_jk2.c and _pleased_ to say JkUriSet
now registers correctly the same as a [uri] section, and can access /admin
with only a Location in the httpd.conf. I did note there were
Hello,
I decided to try the new mod_jk2 today. I put all the files in the
right place, but got this error when starting up httpd:
Starting httpd: Syntax error on line 5 of /etc/httpd/conf.d/jk2.conf:
Cannot load /etc/httpd/modules/mod_jk2.so into server:
/etc/httpd/modules/mod_jk2.so: undefined
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello,
I decided to try the new mod_jk2 today. I put all the files in the
right place, but got this error when starting up httpd:
Starting httpd: Syntax error on line 5 of /etc/httpd/conf.d/jk2.conf:
Cannot load /etc/httpd/modules/mod_jk2.so into server:
/etc
to mod_jk2.c and _pleased_ to say JkUriSet
now registers correctly the same as a [uri] section, and can access /admin
with only a Location in the httpd.conf. I did note there were duplicate
uri objects created (based on their name) if the same uri spec was in both
files, but in any case
jfclere 2004/03/31 06:22:04
Modified:jk/native2/server/apache2 mod_jk2.c
Log:
Fix handling of id added in jk2_create_dir_config().
I do not see why we need this id... May because jk2_merge_dir_config()
was buggy.
That fixes PR 18472 and 28916.
Revision ChangesPath
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
jfclere 2004/03/31 06:22:04
Modified:jk/native2/server/apache2 mod_jk2.c
Log:
Fix handling of id added in jk2_create_dir_config().
Please review I spent time to find why we added the id to path and uri but
now I do not understand why we added it.
I do
Good morning All.
Just tried Jean's recent change to mod_jk2.c and _pleased_ to say JkUriSet
now registers correctly the same as a [uri] section, and can access /admin
with only a Location in the httpd.conf. I did note there were duplicate
uri objects created (based on their name) if the same uri
NormW wrote:
Good morning All.
Just tried Jean's recent change to mod_jk2.c and _pleased_ to say JkUriSet
now registers correctly the same as a [uri] section, and can access /admin
with only a Location in the httpd.conf. I did note there were duplicate
uri objects created (based on their name
/show_bug.cgi?id=28016
mod_jk2 2.0.4 does not work with existing configuration
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-04-01 07:23 ---
There was some change in jk2 code commited yesterday.
Thanks to check with latest HEAD and close the bug if it's fixed
/show_bug.cgi?id=18472
mod_jk2 doesn't handle vhosts correctly when using the JkUriSet commands
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-04-01 07:23 ---
There was some change in jk2 code commited yesterday.
Thanks to check with latest HEAD and close the bug if it's fixed
/show_bug.cgi?id=24882
mod_jk (and mod_jk2) missing post parameters in a fail over scenario
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED
/show_bug.cgi?id=24882
mod_jk (and mod_jk2) missing post parameters in a fail over scenario
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-03-30 21:52 ---
There is case with POST DATA more than 4k where we couldn't send the whole
datas to the second tomcat.
Could you tell us the POST
/show_bug.cgi?id=24882
mod_jk (and mod_jk2) missing post parameters in a fail over scenario
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-03-31 06:48 ---
I tested mod_jk 1.x CVS Version and it resloved the initial bug
1 - 100 of 682 matches
Mail list logo
