JSP will do flush when call PageContext.include even make autoflush=false.
So how can I call include or any similar function like include without
flush? Since in that include page, I have error checkings. If have errors,
then will forward to some pages.
Once JSP flushed, I can't do forward any
Hi,
I'm going to develop an authentication realm (based on FORM
authentication) for TC 4.0.1 which performs a kind of
challenge/response task: Put a challange into a session variable
on the login page (.jsp). The expected password would then be the
encrypted challenge. Whithin my realm
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4807.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4826.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Pier, Tom,
cool, the discussion is starting to become interesting. :-)
comments below:
- Original Message -
From: Pier Fumagalli [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 3:04 AM
Subject: Re: Tomcat: Distributed Session Management
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4828.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
hi!
when using mod_webapp as connector to apache,
response.flushBuffer() doesn't
work in current versions of tomcat. i think this is because
of the packet
system of the warp connector.
we work with a modified version of tomcat, which sovles this
problem by
implementing
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4829.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4830.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Eric Rescorla wrote:
As discussed on the list previously, I'm working on changing the SSL
interfaces in Tomcat to make them more portable to various SSL
toolkits, in particular PureTLS. In the process I've run into some
issues that I wanted to run by the list.
1. I don't see how to make
hello,
im trying the jspc4 jsp compiler from the tc 401 rpm on linux, and im
having some problems.
i have been using the tc 3.2 jspc for some time, and that has worked well.
first, /usr/bin/jspc4 cant find /usr/bin/jasper.sh. the script probably
wants to access
/usr/bin/jasper4.
when i run
Pier:
Great discussion points. I really appreciate your thoughtful feedback.
My comment about Tomcat caching session data does not preclude
it from being stored in the remote session server. Indeed, this would
be required. My thought was this, in a multi-node network if multiple
contiguous
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4807.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3509.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4551.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
On 13/11/2001 10:10 am, GOMEZ Henri [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ASAP, I'll make a snapshot of jtc in my home dir and do the
RPM
Thanks :) Once I finish my Job Hunt I'll also probably have some time to
update and tag a release... :( :( :(
Pier
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4465.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
thanks to forward more information for my RPM :)
-
Henri Gomez ___[_]
EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .)
PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo...
PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6
-Original Message-
From: Joakim
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4693.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
What APR shoud I use ?
I've got a snap of JTC (rigth now), but I need to
get the correct APR ?
PS: Good news with Apache 2.0, APR is now shared lib,
and for example my Apache 2.0 RPM export it :)
-
Henri Gomez ___[_]
EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .)
On Tue, 13 Nov 2001, Harden ZHU wrote:
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2001 03:31:38 -0500
From: Harden ZHU [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: PageContext.include and flush
JSP will do flush when call
marcsaeg01/11/13 06:29:35
Modified:.Tag: tomcat_32 RELEASE-NOTES
src/doc Tag: tomcat_32 readme
Log:
Final update to release notes prior to release vote.
Revision ChangesPath
No revision
No revision
Craig R. McClanahan wrote:
So how can I call include or any similar function like include without
flush? Since in that include page, I have error checkings. If have errors,
then will forward to some pages.
Once JSP flushed, I can't do forward any more. Or any solution for that?
I'd suggest
The beta for Tomcat 3.2.4 is complete. During the beta there was one minor
code change to fix bug 4577. This fix does not require another beta cycle.
There are currently no Bugzilla bugs open against version 3.2.x.
I propose that we release the current tip of the tomcat_32 branch as Tomcat
+1
I've got a question about 3.2 against 3.3.
Now that 3.3 is released, did 3.2 will be deprecated in favor of 3.3,
since both of them support Servlet 2.2/JSP 1.1 ?
Regards
-
Henri Gomez ___[_]
EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .)
PGP KEY : 697ECEDD
+1
Marc Saegesser wrote:
The beta for Tomcat 3.2.4 is complete. During the beta there was one minor
code change to fix bug 4577. This fix does not require another beta cycle.
There are currently no Bugzilla bugs open against version 3.2.x.
I propose that we release the current tip of
Vote to release the tomcat_32 branch as Tomcat 3.2.4.
[X] +1. I agree with the proposal and I will help support
the release.
[ ] +0. I agree with the proposal but I will not be able
to help support the release.
[ ] -0. I don't agree with the proposal but I won't stop
I think that 3.3 should be the officialy supported Servlet 2.2/JSP 1.1
release. Version 3.2.4 exists only because there were bug fixes and patches
received after 3.2.3 was released and before 3.3 was released and these
fixes should be made available to existing 3.2.4 users. Anyone just getting
On Tue, 13 Nov 2001, Marc Saegesser wrote:
-
Vote to release the tomcat_32 branch as Tomcat 3.2.4.
[ ] +1. I agree with the proposal and I will help support
the release.
[X] +0. I agree with the proposal but I will not be
On 13/11/2001 02:36 pm, GOMEZ Henri [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What APR shoud I use ?
I've got a snap of JTC (rigth now), but I need to
get the correct APR ?
Use yesterday night's nightly snapshot http://nagoya.apache.org/~pier.
I tested it and it works...
PS: Good news with Apache 2.0,
jean-frederic clere [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Eric Rescorla wrote:
As discussed on the list previously, I'm working on changing the SSL
interfaces in Tomcat to make them more portable to various SSL
toolkits, in particular PureTLS. In the process I've run into some
issues that I
Pier, Mikal:
I agree, I think the juices are flowing. See below
Tom
- Original Message -
From: Mika Goeckel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 1:37 AM
Subject: Re: Tomcat: Distributed Session Management revisited
| Pier,
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4386.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4841.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Vote to release the tomcat_32 branch as Tomcat 3.2.4.
[X] +1. I agree with the proposal and I will help support
the release.
[ ] +0. I agree with the proposal but I will not be able
to help support the release.
[ ] -0. I don't agree with the proposal but I won't stop
+1
Saludos ,
Ignacio J. Ortega
-Mensaje original-
De: Marc Saegesser [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Enviado el: martes 13 de noviembre de 2001 15:53
Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Asunto: [VOTE] Release Tomcat 3.2.4
The beta for Tomcat 3.2.4 is complete. During the beta there
was one
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4841.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
On Tue, 13 Nov 2001, Marc Saegesser wrote:
Vote to release the tomcat_32 branch as Tomcat 3.2.4.
[X] +1. I agree with the proposal and I will help support
the release.
[ ] +0. I agree with the proposal but I will not be able
to help support the release.
[ ] -0. I
SNMP, ah ja. I've got no knowledge at all 'bout that, so fight with some
other lobbyists :-)
SessionManager/ServletContainer dualism:
If we don't create a separate SessionManager residing in it's own JVM, but
make it an integral capability of TC, we have the following benefits:
- we save one
I tried using the mod_webapp binary for Solaris 8 but it was complaining
about something so I'm trying to build it myself.
At first I had some problems with APXS but after following the instructions
at http://www2.real-time.com/rte-tomcat/2000/Jun/msg00217.html I was able to
get mod_webapp to at
On Mon, 12 Nov 2001, Eric Rescorla wrote:
1. I don't see how to make the switch-hit via a configuration file in
3.3. If you set the secure variable for your virtual server,
PoolTCPConnector tries to load the class named in socketFactoryName,
or, if null, the class named in SSL_FACT
On 13/11/2001 04:38 pm, Mika Goeckel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
SNMP, ah ja. I've got no knowledge at all 'bout that, so fight with some
other lobbyists :-)
Same here...
SessionManager/ServletContainer dualism:
If we don't create a separate SessionManager residing in it's own JVM, but
Hi,
Interesting discussion, it's good to see some on this distribution
issue, the devils always in the detail! See comments
| But how would they know where the sessions ended up
All session managers keep a copy of all sessions. So, it doesn't matter
which server a client talks to.
craigmcc01/11/13 08:57:22
Modified:.build.xml
catalina build.xml
catalina/src/bin digest.bat digest.sh
Added: catalina/src/bin tool-wrapper.bat tool-wrapper.sh
catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/startup Tool.java
Log:
Pier:
Great discussion points. I really appreciate your thoughtful feedback.
My comment about Tomcat caching session data does not preclude
it from being stored in the remote session server. Indeed, this would
be required. My thought was this, in a multi-node network if multiple
contiguous
Did you try my RPM ?
-
Henri Gomez ___[_]
EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .)
PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo...
PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Setting the socketFactory can force one behavior or another, but for
'regular' users it should be possible to just set secure and the code
to detect what is available and use it.
I can do this.
IMHO it's a mistake to rely on that behavior since it's kind of a
Vote to release the tomcat_32 branch as Tomcat 3.2.4.
[ ] +1. I agree with the proposal and I will help support
the release.
[X] +0. I agree with the proposal but I will not be able
to help support the release.
[ ] -0. I don't agree with the proposal but I won't stop
-
Vote to release the tomcat_32 branch as Tomcat 3.2.4.
[X] +1. I agree with the proposal and I will help support
the release.
[ ] +0. I agree with the proposal but I will not be able
to help support the release.
[
Vote to release the tomcat_32 branch as Tomcat 3.2.4.
[ ] +1. I agree with the proposal and I will help support
the release.
[X] +0. I agree with the proposal but I will not be able
to help support the release.
[ ] -0. I don't agree with the proposal but I won't stop
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4843.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
If no encoding is known or set in the xml, utf-8 will be assumed.
That is all I can help you with ;))
Mvgr,
Martin
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 7:08 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4843]
sorry.. I have a reading problem ;)) I put this comment in bugzilla ;)
Mvgr,
Martin
-Original Message-
From: Martin van den Bemt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 7:11 PM
To: Tomcat Developers List
Subject: RE: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4843] New: - The stream from
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4843.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
- Original Message -
From: Pier Fumagalli [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 8:56 AM
Subject: Re: Tomcat: Distributed Session Management revisited
| On 13/11/2001 04:38 pm, Mika Goeckel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
|
| SNMP, ah
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4830.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
I'm also having the same problem with libgcc when I try and build and
compile my own mod_jk.
Any pointers on where libgcc should be so that Apache/mod_xx finds it would
be appreciated.
And this is the error I get when trying the pre-compiled mod_webapp for
Solaris 8:
Syntax error on line 206 of
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4829.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
- Original Message -
From: GOMEZ Henri [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 9:15 AM
Subject: RE: Tomcat: Distributed Session Management revisited
... stuff deleted ...
| Notice also, in my concept, there are no delays built
On Tue, 13 Nov 2001, Tom Drake wrote:
I want a distributed session store, where all sessions are known (or
are knowable) by all members of the cluster, with a built-in
fail-over mechanism?
As you guys discuss this, don't forget a very important requirement in the
servlet specification with
On 13/11/2001 06:53 pm, Tom Drake [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| SNMP, ah ja. I've got no knowledge at all 'bout that, so fight with some
| other lobbyists :-)
|
| Same here...
Didn't mean to take a left turn. Sorry I mentioned it.
Oh, I mean, I don't mind... The only thing is that I have
On 13/11/2001 07:41 pm, Craig R. McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 13 Nov 2001, Tom Drake wrote:
I want a distributed session store, where all sessions are known (or
are knowable) by all members of the cluster, with a built-in
fail-over mechanism?
As you guys discuss this,
On 13/11/2001 07:59 pm, Mika Goeckel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Scenario:
4) 10 Tomcat webservers acting as SessionManagers for Sessions initially
created by themselves or being assigned responsibility afterwards for a
specific session.
In this scenario every Tomcat backs up sessions to a
Can't help you on that... But, if we customize the lookup tables
abstracting it from JNDI, we could write also some C code for the
web-server
modules that could participate in our session pooling group, and direct
requests where they should be, two pigeons with a single shot :)
Something in
On Tue, 13 Nov 2001, Mika Goeckel wrote:
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2001 21:19:35 +0100
From: Mika Goeckel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Tomcat: Distributed Session Management revisited
Hi Craig,
On Tue, 13 Nov 2001, Pier Fumagalli wrote:
So, basically, we have to design a lock/unlock mechanism (that complicates
stuff). It would be easier to achieve without that requirement... (god knows
why Danny added it).
See the answer I just sent for more details -- not enforcing this
Cool, sounds like having a primary owner and front-end redirection to it
solves that without lock distribution.
Means that an owner can't allow another TC to take over a session whilst
processing a request, but as he knows when he's finished, that's easy.
M.
- Original Message -
From:
One question - wouldn't be better if the 'distributed session management'
would be first designed and discussed _outside_ of the ServletSession
context ?
In other words, a SessionManager that would store and provide
fail-over, etc for serializable objects. It can have a rich interface,
See below.
- Original Message -
From: Pier Fumagalli [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 12:23 PM
Subject: Re: Tomcat: Distributed Session Management revisited
| ASFAICT, minimal redundance is all that is required. There's
- Original Message -
From: Craig R. McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tom Drake
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 11:41 AM
Subject: Re: Tomcat: Distributed Session Management revisited
| As you guys discuss this, don't forget a
Add -R/path/to/gcc-3.0/lib to your LDFLAGS.
Where exactly? (axps, tomcat, or apache?)
Thanks,
Matt
-Original Message-
From: Justin Erenkrantz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 2:11 PM
To: Tomcat Developers List
Subject: Re: Building mod_webapp on Solaris 8
- Original Message -
From: Craig R. McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 12:31 PM
Subject: Re: Tomcat: Distributed Session Management revisited
|
|
| On Tue, 13 Nov 2001, Mika Goeckel wrote:
|
| Date: Tue, 13 Nov
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Tom Drake [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 1:05 PM
Subject: Re: Tomcat: Distributed Session Management revisited
|
| One question - wouldn't be better if the 'distributed
On Tue, 13 Nov 2001, Tom Drake wrote:
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2001 13:21:20 -0800
From: Tom Drake [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Tom Drake [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Tomcat: Distributed Session
See intermixed.
On Tue, 13 Nov 2001, Tom Drake wrote:
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2001 13:27:23 -0800
From: Tom Drake [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Tom Drake [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Tomcat: Distributed
On Tue, 13 Nov 2001, Tom Drake wrote:
| One question - wouldn't be better if the 'distributed session management'
| would be first designed and discussed _outside_ of the ServletSession
| context ?
I agree.
| Designing the SessionManager as a standalone component would make a lot of
|
Hello,
We run couple dozens of web srevers, for different services.
The port number and host name to bind to comes from a config file.
I need to have a way to specify port number and hostname which to which
it should bind
when the server startsup, on the command line (through catalina.sh
- Original Message -
From: Craig R. McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tom Drake
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 1:25 PM
Subject: Re: Tomcat: Distributed Session Management revisited
... stuff deleted ...
| | It would be
Create a bash script that copies the original server.xml, adjusts the
configuration and after that starts tomcat. (that's the way we do it). You
need to use sed or some other tool to replace the entries you want to
replace...
Mvgr,
Martin
-Original Message-
From: praveen Kumar
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4824.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
See my comments below.
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tom Drake
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 2:08 PM
Subject: Re: Tomcat: Distributed Session Management revisited
| On Tue, 13 Nov 2001, Tom Drake wrote:
|
Tom Drake wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Craig R. McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tom Drake
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 1:25 PM
Subject: Re: Tomcat: Distributed Session Management revisited
... stuff deleted
- Original Message -
From: Paul Speed [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 11:30 PM
Subject: Re: Tomcat: Distributed Session Management revisited
Tom Drake wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Craig R. McClanahan
craigmcc01/11/13 14:42:31
Added: catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/realm
JAASCallbackHandler.java JAASMemoryLoginModule.java
JAASRealm.java
Log:
Basic implementation of a Realm that uses JAAS APIs underneath to perform
On Tue, 13 Nov 2001, Mika Goeckel wrote:
I completely agree, that the API lacks proactive support for things in the
background that may fail.
But given the fact, that we support a reference implementation which has
managed to provide really professional services to users (other ref
Mika Goeckel wrote:
[ snip ]
I'm not saying this is necessarily a good idea, but you can byte
compare the resulting session serialization to see if the session
objects have changed. All you have to do is keep a local copy of
the original session during the request. Not very
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4855.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 13 Nov 2001, Mika Goeckel wrote:
I completely agree, that the API lacks proactive support for things in the
background that may fail.
But given the fact, that we support a reference implementation which has
managed to provide really professional
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4824.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4855.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4855.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
remm01/11/13 15:56:07
Modified:catalina build.xml
Log:
- Fix typo.
Revision ChangesPath
1.89 +1 -1 jakarta-tomcat-4.0/catalina/build.xml
Index: build.xml
===
RCS file:
See below
- Original Message -
From: Paul Speed [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 3:48 PM
Subject: Re: Tomcat: Distributed Session Management revisited
... stuff deleted ...
|
| The main issue is that the app has no
On Tue, 13 Nov 2001, Paul Speed wrote:
I think the idea is that you'd byte compare on commit which ideally
would happen at request boundaries. So in this case a single request
becomes a transaction... which indeed opens up its own issues, but
no bigger than the ones that were always there.
remm01/11/13 16:10:44
Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/loader
WebappClassLoader.java
Log:
- Fix bug 4830.
Revision ChangesPath
1.27 +9 -5
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4830.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
remm01/11/13 16:36:21
Modified:webapps/tomcat-docs/appdev processes.xml
Log:
- Fix bug 4431 (path was incorrect).
Revision ChangesPath
1.3 +1 -1 jakarta-tomcat-4.0/webapps/tomcat-docs/appdev/processes.xml
Index: processes.xml
remm01/11/13 16:38:44
Modified:webapps/tomcat-docs/appdev Tag: tomcat_40_branch
processes.xml
Log:
- Fix bug 4431 (path was incorrect).
Revision ChangesPath
No revision
No revision
1.2.2.1
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4431.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
/show_bug.cgi?id=4841
Problem sending files trought MOD_webapp
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2001-11-13 18:05 ---
Which one should I download?
cause I tried with webapp-module-2003.tar.gz and I got the same problem
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
1 - 100 of 107 matches
Mail list logo
