DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8582.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7520.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8583.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8586.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Nick Betteridge [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Eric Rescorla wrote:
This didn't make it out the first time so I'm resending...
I'm looking at what needs to be done to make the 3.3 SSL portablity
stuff work properly with Coyote. For the most part, this work has been
done--if you set the
jGuru maintains FAQs and Forums on Servlets, JSP, and Tomcat (as well as
many other Java topics). Here is an automated update on recent postings to
Tomcat-related FAQs. Please direct flames and feedback to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
- Alex
Bill Barker [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
From: Eric Rescorla [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I assume you mean actions. They are defined in o.a.c.ActionCode, and
processed by somebody implementing o.a.c.ActionHook (both under the coyote
directory). For the HTTP/1.1 connector, this is
A while back, I responded to Henri Gomez's email:
We will create really soon webpages for
jakarta-tomcat-connectors
with an offer to summarize some of the recent discussion
about the various connectors currently available for
Tomcat. Not to write new docs, just summarize the existing
Cavan Morris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey Guys,
I reported bug 8433 and am looking for a way to solve it. I thought that the
socketpool work you're doing might solve the problem but wasn't able to
compile the latest from cvs.
My question is do you think that what you're working on could
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8588.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8590.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8583.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Attached is an ASCII file with my build process. It may be important to not that I'm
using the APR libraries from the webapp-module-1.0.2-tc402 and apxs from apache 2.0.32
not 2.0.35.
Question:
when you say Yes, that's right... do you mean yes that's right, the socketpool work
may solve bug
I built Tomcat 4.1 with Jasper 2 from CVS a few days ago and encountered
a number of problems with the JSP's in the example web app.
I recommend testing the 4.1.0 build first if you want to test 4.1. At least
this rules out possible build errors.
A number of the JSP's returned empty pages
Cavan Morris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Attached is an ASCII file with my build process. It may be important to not
that I'm using the APR libraries from the webapp-module-1.0.2-tc402 and apxs
from apache 2.0.32 not 2.0.35.
You _need_ to use the APR libraries shipped with your Apache 2.0
Hi Guys,
I asked this question before but I didn't get any answer, is there is a
configuration to disable JASPER checking of the timestamp on the JSP page
each request, it is an important configurtion in a production envirnoment
where things seldom changes, it is the same concept as the
context file=/webapps/tomcat-docs/config/webapp.xml
pbIMPORTANT NOTE: The Webapp connector is now deprecated. Use
the Coyote JK 2 connector instead./b/p
/context
I'm just asking why??? Just because it doesn't use Coyote?
Pier
--
I think that it's extremely foolish to name a server
Well I changed the apr libs I was using and had the same errors. I'm using the Worker
MPM.
Side Note: I would also like to know why the webapp connector is being deprecated.
It may need a little work, but it's ease of configuration is a great feature. I am
concerned with it's performance
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8596.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8596.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
nacho 02/04/27 17:19:27
Modified:jk/native2/common jk_uriEnv.c
Log:
* Use uriEnv-workerName for logs
Revision ChangesPath
1.10 +4 -4 jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native2/common/jk_uriEnv.c
Index: jk_uriEnv.c
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8596.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4042.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hi,
When I try to run make in
jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native2/server/apache2 I get a compile error.
One of the errors is:
gcc: unrecognized option `-prefer-pic'
Does this mean that I´ve got the wrong version of gcc? I´ve got v2.95
installed.
I would really like to get mod_jk2 compiled
24 matches
Mail list logo