Since the nightly builds for Tomcat 4 are broken, I've packaged and
uploaded a new test milestone, which includes the latest changes to
Jasper 2.
See the release notes for the list of changes over 4.1.3.
Downloads:
http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat-4.0/test/v4.1.4/
Release
jfclere 2002/06/10 00:51:06
Modified:jk/native2/common jk_worker_ajp13.c
Log:
Typo.
Revision ChangesPath
1.30 +1 -1 jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native2/common/jk_worker_ajp13.c
Index: jk_worker_ajp13.c
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can you try again ? I suspect it was a problem with some log statements
having NULL params ( as %s ).
I switched to use apr_vsprintf, now it should be consistent on all
platforms.
That fixes the cores: APR is great!
Let me know what's the next error :-)
+++
I should create another directory at this place called jk2.. agree?
+1,
We'll have to do the same for jk ;)
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
BTW, the licence on JMX_RI_1.1 seems slightly different from
the previous, it may ( or not ) be distributable. Any lawyer
wanting to become commiter on tomcat ?
( of course, using an open source product is better, but
again the terms on MX4J are still unclear wrt JCP test
requirements - which
I'd like to propose Mladen Turk [mturk at mappingsoft.com]
as a new Tomcat committer.
He does a great job in jk2, also involved in APR, he seems very
interested in continuing its contribution on jk2 and java area.
-
Henri Gomez ___[_]
EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .)
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9737.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
I'm experiencing exactly this problem as (the original message) below, can
somebody please help.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Christian Bourque)
Subject: session timeout bug ?
Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2001 13:48:37 -0400
Hi !
I've been searching everywhere for this problem and I just can't find any
I'll test it against my JSTL tag pages and see how it works.
peter
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Hi,
The recent tag reuse changes appear to be great, but seem to have the
disadvantage of breaking existing tags (for example, the Foo tag in the
examples, as well as two of the tags from the admin
+1
Saludos ,
Ignacio J. Ortega
-Mensaje original-
De: GOMEZ Henri [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Enviado el: 10 de junio de 2002 12:25
Para: Tomcat Developers List
Asunto: [VOTE] New Committer Mladen Turk
I'd like to propose Mladen Turk [mturk at mappingsoft.com]
as a new Tomcat
Hello,
in Tomcat 4.0 it is possible to use BASIC authentication together with encrypted
passwords (e.g. adding attribute digest=MD5) to a Realm/ element, or DIGEST with
passwords only stored in clear-text. It's not possible to use DIGEST authentication
together with encrypted passwords. The
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9655.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hi guys.
Several months ago, I compiled a release of the mod_jk connector under AIX
4.3.3.
Up until now I received several dozens of mails which ask me to send them
my mod_jk.so.
9 / 10 peoples succeded to use it.
I don't know if I'll be able to reply all my life ( ;-) ) so I would like
to
This email is autogenerated from the output from:
http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/gump/2002-06-10/jakarta-tomcat.html
Buildfile: build.xml
detect:
uptodate:
msg.jdk12:
[echo]
Could you get a recent snapshot of JTC, and rebuild
JK (JK2) for AIX 4.3.3 ?
Thanks to add comments, ie using xlc or gnu
-
Henri Gomez ___[_]
EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .)
PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo...
PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8
I ran a quick test of 4.1.4 with JSTL tags and I am getting an exception
with import tag.
org.apache.jasper.JasperException: Unable to compile class for JSP
An error occurred at line: -1 in the jsp file: null
Generated
Did there is still work on progress in JK (native) in JTC ?
If not, it could be the good moment to make a 1.2.0 snapshot,
and ask contributers/friends to generate binaries on there
platforms.
Regards
-
Henri Gomez ___[_]
EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .)
GOMEZ Henri wrote:
I'd like to propose Mladen Turk [mturk at mappingsoft.com]
as a new Tomcat committer.
He does a great job in jk2, also involved in APR, he seems very
interested in continuing its contribution on jk2 and java area.
+1
-
Henri Gomez ___[_]
EMAIL
Yes it could be a good idea because I can't have access to the CVS repository to
generate a newer release of mod_jk under AIX 4.3.3.
Thx
-Message d'origine-
De: GOMEZ Henri [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Date: lundi 10 juin 2002 15:26
A: Tomcat Developers List
Objet: jk 1.2
GOMEZ Henri wrote:
Did there is still work on progress in JK (native) in JTC ?
I am still trying to get it run on Solaris but no success (and very little time).
If you tell jk1.2 you mean native2 don't you?
If not, it could be the good moment to make a 1.2.0 snapshot,
and ask
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9745.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9745.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hum, can't access :
http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-commons/release/commons-logging/v1.0.1/
-
Henri Gomez ___[_]
EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .)
PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo...
PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A
I am still trying to get it run on Solaris but no success (and
very little time).
If you tell jk1.2 you mean native2 don't you?
no
---
jk 1.1 = tomcat 3.3/mod_jk
jk 1.2 = jtc/native
jk 2.0 = jtc/native 2
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail:
Clere, Jean-Frederic wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can you try again ? I suspect it was a problem with some log statements
having NULL params ( as %s ).
I switched to use apr_vsprintf, now it should be consistent on all
platforms.
That fixes the cores: APR is great!
Let me
On Mon, 10 Jun 2002, GOMEZ Henri wrote:
I'd like to propose Mladen Turk [mturk at mappingsoft.com]
as a new Tomcat committer.
He does a great job in jk2, also involved in APR, he seems very
interested in continuing its contribution on jk2 and java area.
+1
I was going to do the same
On Mon, 10 Jun 2002, GOMEZ Henri wrote:
Did there is still work on progress in JK (native) in JTC ?
If not, it could be the good moment to make a 1.2.0 snapshot,
and ask contributers/friends to generate binaries on there
platforms.
+1 !
The recent bug report about 'deadlock' turned out
On Mon, 10 Jun 2002, GOMEZ Henri wrote:
I am still trying to get it run on Solaris but no success (and
very little time).
If you tell jk1.2 you mean native2 don't you?
no
---
jk 1.1 = tomcat 3.3/mod_jk
jk 1.2 = jtc/native
jk 2.0 = jtc/native 2
And jk1.0 = tomcat3.2/mod_jk.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8992.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hi,
I'm using a VS.NET for building and here is a patch that enables to do
so.
I've introduced a new var mssdk.tool (no more ugly ../Common/).
MT.
Index: build.properties.sample
===
RCS file:
GOMEZ Henri wrote:
I'd like to propose Mladen Turk [mturk at mappingsoft.com]
as a new Tomcat committer.
He does a great job in jk2, also involved in APR, he seems very
interested in continuing its contribution on jk2 and java area.
+1.
Remy
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL
peter lin wrote:
I ran a quick test of 4.1.4 with JSTL tags and I am getting an exception
with import tag.
org.apache.jasper.JasperException: Unable to compile class for JSP
An error occurred at line: -1 in the jsp
On Sun, 9 Jun 2002, Arvind Srinivasan wrote:
Date: Sun, 09 Jun 2002 23:36:47 -0700
From: Arvind Srinivasan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Qn about a performance bottleneck
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 10 Jun 2002, GOMEZ Henri wrote:
I am still trying to get it run on Solaris but no success (and
very little time).
If you tell jk1.2 you mean native2 don't you?
no
---
jk 1.1 = tomcat 3.3/mod_jk
jk 1.2 = jtc/native
jk 2.0 = jtc/native 2
And jk1.0 =
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9749.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
I got it running on solaris and hp/ux, but I'll try again
with more tests.
I have just retested jk 1.2: it works on solaris (With a
Fujitsu compiler,
Apache-2.0 and JkLogLevel debug).
+++
error_log:[Mon Jun 10 10:17:25 2002] [warn] uriEnv.init()
uri:/jkstatus/* host
=(null)
GOMEZ Henri wrote:
I got it running on solaris and hp/ux, but I'll try again
with more tests.
I have just retested jk 1.2: it works on solaris (With a
Fujitsu compiler,
Apache-2.0 and JkLogLevel debug).
+++
error_log:[Mon Jun 10 10:17:25 2002] [warn] uriEnv.init()
uri:/jkstatus/* host
Could we have stable tarballs for servlet 2.2 and 2.3
at http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/ ?
Only nigthly are present, even if they are stable and
probably tagged since many times now
-
Henri Gomez ___[_]
EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .)
PGP KEY :
Hello everybody!
I have a great problem.:-(
I have installed IIS as Web Server and Tomcat 4 as JSP/Servlet container:
the problem is that when I connect to a site that must be redirected to
Tomcat (because it contains JSP/servlets pages) the servlet container (i.e.
Tomcat 4) asks me to
GOMEZ Henri wrote:
Hum, can't access :
http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-commons/release/commons-logging/v1.0.1/
Yes. You have to use the two jars in j-t-c/lib while waiting for the dot
release to happen.
Remy
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional
Really off topic but interesting, here is how you could
launch Tomcat from RPG via JNI on recent AS/400.
I'm sure Pier and JF will love it :)
PS: My company is proud to offer it to ASF, but RPG compiler
editing limitation, prevent us to use the standard 80
CLP, a kind of tomcat.sh
Shoud I get the cvs version instead ?
-
Henri Gomez ___[_]
EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .)
PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo...
PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6
-Original Message-
From: Remy Maucherat
PS: My company is proud to offer it to ASF, but RPG compiler
editing limitation, prevent us to use the standard 80
the standard 80 columns licence file, since comments in RPG
start at column 6
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail:
GOMEZ Henri wrote:
Shoud I get the cvs version instead ?
I don't think Costin put his packaging changes in the commons repository
yet. It would be a good idea if he did.
In the meantime, I'm packaging the milestones with:
- the commons-logging JARs from j-t-c/lib
- MX4J JARs from j-t-c/lib
In the meantime, I'm packaging the milestones with:
- the commons-logging JARs from j-t-c/lib
- MX4J JARs from j-t-c/lib
and mx4j 1.1 ?
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
kinman 2002/06/10 10:02:37
Modified:jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/compiler Generator.java
Log:
- A out-of-line tag method should throw Throwable, since doCatch does.
Revision ChangesPath
1.21 +4 -4
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
kinman 2002/06/10 10:02:37
Modified:jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/compiler Generator.java
Log:
- A out-of-line tag method should throw Throwable, since doCatch does.
My patch from yesterday to add tag buffer reuse is causing some
problems,
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9254.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9715.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
- Original Message -
From: Remy Maucherat [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, June 09, 2002 10:42 PM
Subject: [Jasper 2] Tag reuse problems
Hi,
The recent tag reuse changes appear to be great, but seem to have the
disadvantage of breaking
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9715.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9754.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hi
Is it possible to write our own connector using catalina. If so can some one
point me to the proper documentation
Thanks
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Craig R. McClanahan wrote:
The purpose is a performance optimization -- on subsequent requests to
/servlet/foo, the container should find an existing mapping for the
servlet, so it will get called directly instead of going through the
invoker.
context.addServletMapping is called on
glenn 2002/06/10 12:19:23
Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/servlets
HTMLManagerServlet.java LocalStrings.properties
Log:
Updated HTMLManagerServlet, contributed by Malcolm Edgar
Revision ChangesPath
1.7 +373 -223
Chandra Talluri wrote:
Is it possible to write our own connector using catalina. If so
can some one point me to the proper documentation
It depends on exactly what you're trying to do. There are
two (closely connected) ways that the term connector is
used. First, Catalina has an
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6194.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hi,
The question I asked is for the following problem, which I posted on Friday
and got no inputs. Can you please comment on this
I am just wondering how to go about the following problem
We have our own server which accepts the data either on a TCP port or an UDP
port. we want to use only
Chandra Talluri [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
The question I asked is for the following problem, which I posted on Friday
and got no inputs. Can you please comment on this
I am just wondering how to go about the following problem
We have our own server which accepts the data either on
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6194.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9715.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Chandra Talluri wrote:
We have our own server which accepts the data either on a TCP
port or a UDP port.
the data is a little vague. What does the data look
like? What does the server actually do, right now? What's
it for? The more specific you can be about what you're
trying to do, the
remm2002/06/10 13:12:27
Modified:jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/compiler Generator.java
jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/runtime
BodyContentImpl.java PageContextImpl.java
Log:
- Code cleanup, based on ideas by Kin-Man. It still has
De: jean-frederic clere [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Enviado el: 10 de junio de 2002 16:21
That is the %p in the format string. Using %#lx instead fixes
the display:
Where i can found information about the exact format specifiers
apr_psprintf accepts?
Checked docs and code, but docs are at
On Mon, 10 Jun 2002, Chandra Talluri wrote:
We have our own server which accepts the data either on a TCP port or an UDP
port. we want to use only Catalina connector to process the data and spit
out html. We don't want to use any web server or the tomcat server.
You can take a look at
On Mon, 10 Jun 2002, Ignacio J. Ortega wrote:
De: jean-frederic clere [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Enviado el: 10 de junio de 2002 16:21
That is the %p in the format string. Using %#lx instead fixes
the display:
Where i can found information about the exact format specifiers
remm2002/06/10 14:08:30
Modified:jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/compiler Generator.java
Log:
- Fix problems with JSTL. The timing of the clear of the BodyContent was
incorrect. Now, it is cleared when the buffer is reused.
Revision ChangesPath
1.23 +7
costin 2002/06/10 14:26:25
Modified:jk/java/org/apache/jk/apr AprImpl.java
Log:
Patch from Mladen Turk, to use RegisterNative.
I changed it to make 'inprocess' the default ( better than null ).
Revision ChangesPath
1.20 +5 -2
costin 2002/06/10 14:27:39
Modified:jk/native2/common jk_worker_jni.c
Log:
Second part of the patch.
Revision ChangesPath
1.16 +27 -2 jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native2/common/jk_worker_jni.c
Index: jk_worker_jni.c
costin 2002/06/10 14:30:48
Modified:jk/native2/jni jk_jni_aprImpl.c
Log:
Last part of the patch from Mladen Turk, with few changes.
The apr_initialize() is called if no jk_globalEnv is found, which means
jk wasn't initialized so probably we are in Java standalone mode, and
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9715.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9715.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
costin 2002/06/10 14:36:15
Modified:jk/native2/common jk_worker_jni.c
jk/native2/jni jk_jni_aprImpl.c
Log:
Me again, spell errors.
Revision ChangesPath
1.17 +1 -0 jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native2/common/jk_worker_jni.c
Index:
nacho 2002/06/10 14:41:14
Modified:jk/native2/include jk_msg.h
Log:
Changed the default ajp buffer size to match the Java part
Revision ChangesPath
1.11 +1 -1 jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native2/include/jk_msg.h
Index: jk_msg.h
nacho 2002/06/10 14:49:53
Modified:jk/native2/jni jk_jni_aprImpl.c
Log:
* Changed %p format specifiers to %#lx - Thanks to JFC
* Only relase array if arrayAccessMethod == JK_GET_BYTE_ARRAY_ELEMENTS
Revision ChangesPath
1.34 +19 -16
nacho 2002/06/10 14:53:07
Modified:jk/native2/common jk_logger_file.c
Log:
* Changed %p format specifiers to %#lx - Thanks to JFC
* Added level string to log lines.
Revision ChangesPath
1.28 +19 -4
nacho 2002/06/10 14:55:08
Modified:jk/native2/common jk_channel.c jk_channel_apr_socket.c
jk_channel_jni.c jk_channel_socket.c
jk_channel_un.c jk_config.c jk_config_file.c
jk_endpoint.c jk_env.c
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9677.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
nacho 2002/06/10 15:13:15
Modified:jk/native2/common jk_logger_file.c
Log:
* Added level string to log lines when HAS_APR is not set.
Revision ChangesPath
1.29 +23 -5 jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native2/common/jk_logger_file.c
Index: jk_logger_file.c
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9715.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9715.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9759.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9759.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9677.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9759.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
On Mon, 10 Jun 2002, GOMEZ Henri wrote:
I'd like to propose Mladen Turk [mturk at mappingsoft.com]
as a new Tomcat committer.
+1
He does a great job in jk2, also involved in APR, he seems very
interested in continuing its contribution on jk2 and java area.
-
Henri Gomez
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9700.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
rubys 2002/06/10 16:56:35
Modified:.gump.xml
Log:
Add prereq on jmx
Revision ChangesPath
1.6 +1 -0 jakarta-tomcat/gump.xml
Index: gump.xml
===
RCS file:
costin 2002/06/10 16:57:24
Modified:jk/native2/common jk_channel_jni.c
Log:
Remove the dispatch ( which remains to be used only for incoming AJP messages,
until we finish merging the 2 mechanisms ).
Invoke() will be used instead - that's the new mechanism, used to support
costin 2002/06/10 16:58:52
Modified:jk/native2/common jk_logger_file.c
jk/native2/include jk_global.h
Log:
Remove apr include from logger_file ( which can still be used without APR, for
apache13 use ), move it to global, in the section that deals with the other
costin 2002/06/10 17:01:16
Modified:jk/native2/jni jk_jni_aprImpl.c
Log:
Fix the POST in in-process mode.
The 'response' from a jni invocation is in the same buffer, but we must
call msg-end() to update the message size.
The dispatch mechanism is no longer used ( or it
costin 2002/06/10 17:11:03
Modified:jk/java/org/apache/jk/common ChannelJni.java
Log:
Fix for POST in in-process.
This is a very tricky code - we must 'simulate' a 2-thread model ( i.e.
one tomcat thread sending/receiving messages with apache, and one apache
thread ) in a
costin 2002/06/10 17:13:48
Modified:jk/java/org/apache/jk/common JkInputStream.java
Log:
Deal with the special case of JNI POST. The first receive() is for
the ajp initial chunk, if it is not present it's fine.
Revision ChangesPath
1.8 +36 -14
remm2002/06/10 17:27:56
Modified:.tomcat.nsi
Log:
- Fix (non fatal) error message.
Revision ChangesPath
1.31 +8 -6 jakarta-tomcat-4.0/tomcat.nsi
Index: tomcat.nsi
===
RCS
remm2002/06/10 17:31:43
Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/naming/resources
ProxyDirContext.java
Log:
- Switch to use a LRUMap from Collections 2.0.
- Note: The cacheSize attribute must be on the BaseDirContext (ProxyDirContext
is a only a
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9715.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9745.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9715.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
The recent tag reuse changes appear to be great, but seem to have the
disadvantage of breaking existing tags (for example, the Foo tag in the
examples, as well as two of the tags from the admin webapp). Although
none of these tags was compliant with the specification (both had an
iccorect state
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9715.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
1 - 100 of 110 matches
Mail list logo
