Bill Barker wrote:
Before I start performing major surgery on the TC4/5 connector, I
wanted to
check on what is the reason for having the attributes field in
CoyoteRequest
(instead of just delegating to the o.a.c.Request like the 3.3 Adapter
does).
At the moment, the SSL request attributes
remm2002/10/19 02:30:37
Modified:util/java/org/apache/tomcat/util/net PoolTcpEndpoint.java
Log:
- Attempts to address bug 13736.
- Add code for recovery if the serverSocket dies. Needs testing (I tested with
an exception thrown according to a random value after the socket
Hi folks,
currently I'm busy on tomcat and mod_jk2 (2.0.1) for my
new employer. The Apache Server Status and Information
page thinks that mod_jk2/2.0.0 is loaded. But I'm sure
that mod_jk2-1.3-eapi.so is version 2.0.1.
That's it ... greetings from Germany
Volker
--
We haven't figured out
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13781.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
I really like the new administration web app for Tomcat. I think it will go a long
way to further the use of Tomcat by users that want to focus on building their
application and not have to learn the configuration XML structures of Tomcat.
I also think this type of an Administration Console
Bill, Remy,
I have seen this one once on our production system
running Tomcat 3.3.1 with AJP1.3, Apache 1.3.27, mod_jk 1.1.0
This is on Sparc Solaris 8 running JDK 1.3.1_04.
11019 is our ajp13 port (which we uswe also as shutdown port. No AJP 1.2
port open)
Our webservers use the lb_worker to
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13784.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
