Jean-Francois Arcand wrote:
Hi Henry, a couple of comment about your translation :-)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hgomez 2002/10/31 01:34:44
Added: catalina/src/share/org/apache/naming
LocalStrings_fr.properties
The invoker servlet allows for anyone to call your servlets using their
class names. This is not a problem as long as you are happy with that.
In my case I have some internal servlets (used as a poor substitute for
RMI) where I map the servlets to be under /internal/some.servlet and
then
I just uploaded mod_jk 1.2.0 for Apache 1.3 without
EAPI.
Built on Redhat 7.2 against Apache 1.3.26
Regards
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:tomcat-dev-unsubscribe;jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:tomcat-dev-help;jakarta.apache.org
Glenn Nielsen wrote:
I have imported the mod_jk log analysis scripts into CVS.
The scripts for analyzing the logs generates alot of data.
The scripts for graphing/reporting this data only generates
five long term graphs. More graphs and reports could be generated
from the raw data.
For an
Thanks Martin,
budi
On Mon, 4 Nov 2002, Martin Algesten wrote:
The invoker servlet allows for anyone to call your servlets using their
class names. This is not a problem as long as you are happy with that.
In my case I have some internal servlets (used as a poor substitute for
RMI) where I
jean-frederic clere wrote:
Jean-Francois Arcand wrote:
Hi Henry, a couple of comment about your translation :-)
Ok, what make me think that we may have to team up to manage
all the translation to french. Who's candidate ?
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
fileResources.base=Le document base {0} n''existe pas ou n''est pas
un répertoire lisible
Le document base
ok
warResources.notWar=Doc base doit pointé vers un fichier WAR
warResources.invalidWar=Fichier WAR invalide ou illisible : {0}
jarResources.syntax=Le document base {0} doit
hgomez 2002/11/04 03:46:51
Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/naming/resources
LocalStrings_fr.properties
Log:
Fix french translation following Quebbecoises recommandations ;)
Revision ChangesPath
1.2 +8 -8
hgomez 2002/11/04 03:49:03
Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/naming/resources
LocalStrings_fr.properties
Log:
Oups ;)
Revision ChangesPath
1.3 +1 -1
Hi,
Here is a short patch to mod_jk giving people the opportunity to make mod_jk
honor Apache UseCanonicalName option.
Eg.:
ServerName www.foo.org
UseCanonicalName on
JkOption HonorUseCanonicalName
In practice in the following configuration, whatever the Host header in the
HTTP request,
Thomas Morin wrote:
Hi,
Here is a short patch to mod_jk giving people the opportunity to make mod_jk
honor Apache UseCanonicalName option.
Eg.:
ServerName www.foo.org
UseCanonicalName on
JkOption HonorUseCanonicalName
It's allready included in latest mod_jk (1.2.1-dev) in CVS ;)
...
hgomez 2002/11/04 04:48:30
Added: jk/native CHANGES.txt
Log:
Add a CHANGES to track update between releases
Revision ChangesPath
1.1 jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native/CHANGES.txt
Index: CHANGES.txt
hgomez 2002/11/04 04:50:24
Modified:jk/native CHANGES.txt
Log:
Add comments about reports add-ons
Revision ChangesPath
1.2 +3 -1 jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native/CHANGES.txt
Index: CHANGES.txt
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hgomez 2002/11/04 04:50:24
Modified:jk/native CHANGES.txt
Log:
Add comments about reports add-ons
If nobody object, I'll tag jk 1.2.1 and make a release this week.
Regards
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:tomcat-dev-unsubscribe;jakarta.apache.org
Ignore this, I saw the two items below mentioned in the CHANGES.txt CVS commit.
Glenn Nielsen wrote:
Henri Gomez wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hgomez 2002/11/04 04:50:24
Modified:jk/native CHANGES.txt
Log:
Add comments about reports add-ons
If nobody object, I'll tag jk
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14086.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Glenn Nielsen wrote:
Henri Gomez wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hgomez 2002/11/04 04:50:24
Modified:jk/native CHANGES.txt
Log:
Add comments about reports add-ons
If nobody object, I'll tag jk 1.2.1 and make a release this week.
Does this version have support for
jean-frederic clere wrote:
Henri Gomez wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hgomez 2002/11/04 04:50:24
Modified:jk/native CHANGES.txt
Log:
Add comments about reports add-ons
If nobody object, I'll tag jk 1.2.1 and make a release this week.
I would like to see 14086 fixed
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5715.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14228.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14228.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14228.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14230.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
jfarcand2002/11/04 08:43:31
Modified:catalina/src/conf catalina.policy
Log:
Remove special permission for shared package since it is no used with Tomcat 5.
Revision ChangesPath
1.5 +1 -10 jakarta-tomcat-catalina/catalina/src/conf/catalina.policy
Index:
Hi,
I am trying to use the PersistentManager. But it seems it is not working:
- maxActiveSessions=0:
No session are possible. (That is not what says the server.xml ).
- saveOnRestart=true:
A part creating the file it seems it is doing nothing.
Has someone already use it?
I need a more
I am experiencing some weird behavior with tomcat 4.1.x, but I don't
know if it's a bug or not. What's happening is this.
My setup is the following:
solaris 8 win2K
jdk 1.4.1
tomcat 4.1.12
standalone tomcat w/o any other server.
I have a page which uses iframe/iframe to load some banner (evil
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14187.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10036.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14228.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
kinman 2002/11/04 09:44:25
Modified:jsr152/src/share/javax/servlet/jsp/tagext BodyTag.java
IterationTag.java SimpleTag.java Tag.java
TagData.java TagExtraInfo.java TagInfo.java
VariableInfo.java
-Original Message-
From: Budi Kurniawan [mailto:budik;cse.unsw.EDU.AU]
Sent: Friday, November 01, 2002 7:22 PM
To: Tomcat Developers List
Subject: Security threat with enabling invoker servlet in 4.1.12
Hi,
I've browsed the user list for this question but could not
find the
Hi,
Before I post a bug report, I wanted to run a peculiar situation by the
experts.
I am creating some filters that verify that certain variables are in the
session before allowing access to any page in my site. There are
currently two of them, and each forward the request to a form if a
luehe 2002/11/04 11:15:34
Modified:jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/resources
messages.properties messages_es.properties
messages_ja.properties
Log:
Added error message for jsp.error.useBean.noSession
Revision Changes
Hi,
I have seen this question asked on this list before, but
didn't see a good answer or conclusion at the time they are
raised. Hope there are new ideas now.
The question is: for jsp pages targeting multiple locales, how
to dynamically set page encoding (especially response encoding)
so that
In Servlet 2.3 (i.e. Tomcat 4.x), filters are *not* invoked on request
dispatcher calls -- only on the original request. In Servlet 2.4 (i.e.
Tomcat 5.x) you can optionally configure which filters should be used on
forwards, includes, or both, with suitable settings in web.xml.
Craig
On Mon, 4
OK, that clarifies things a little bit. If the problem isn't with
RequestDispatcher, I am even more puzzled. I have narrowed the problem
down to a particular use case:
I have a single filter that calls
jfarcand2002/11/04 12:22:44
Modified:catalina/src/conf catalina.properties catalina.policy
Log:
Partial fix for the new JSP 2.0 features running under the SecurityManager. The
generated code needs some special permissions in order to run properly. Even when we
do not protect any
luehe 2002/11/04 12:43:07
Modified:jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/compiler
DefaultErrorHandler.java
Log:
simplified impl of jspError() now that errMsg is always guaranteed to be non-null
Revision ChangesPath
1.5 +6 -15
Tuesday is election day. I've developed a web application to perhaps
help you make more educated voting decisions. Follow the links below,
and you can say Yea or Nay on some of the same issues your
congressmen voted on in their most recent session. You don't need to
make a decision on every
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14123.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14124.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
kinman 2002/11/04 13:13:40
Modified:jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/compiler Generator.java
jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/runtime HttpJspBase.java
PageContextImpl.java
Log:
- Fix 14197: allow jspDestroy to be overrided.
Revision
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14059.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14165.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14169.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14179.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
kinman 2002/11/04 13:24:43
Modified:jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/compiler Tag:
tomcat_4_branch Generator.java
jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/runtime Tag:
tomcat_4_branch HttpJspBase.java
Log:
- Fix 14197:
costin,
This fix seems to break errorPage handling in JSP, causing the errorPage
example to fail, and a couple of JSP watchdog tests too. I have reverted
your fix.
I have not reverted the tomcat_4_branch.
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 19:18:55 +
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: cvs commit:
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14197.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Kin-Man Chung wrote:
costin,
This fix seems to break errorPage handling in JSP, causing the errorPage
example to fail, and a couple of JSP watchdog tests too. I have reverted
your fix.
I have not reverted the tomcat_4_branch.
If it breaks something - tomcat_4_branch should be the first
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14059.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
See this bug for more information:
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5715
You can use a servlet filter, so long as you are willing to be a bit
flexible.
Cheers,
Scott
Liu, Xiaoyan wrote:
Hi,
I have seen this question asked on this list before, but
didn't see a good answer
Not sure if this was decided or we are just in a status-quo mode.
My question is what is our position regarding the dependency of
tomcat5 on JMX and the level of integration/support.
There are 2 choices:
- 5.0 requires JMX. If this is the case we can have code that takes
advantage of this a bit
There are now several commerical tools for doing production runtime
monitoring of java applications which can obtain their data using JMX.
Currently JMX in Tomcat is only being used for configuration data.
I would like to see this expanded to support making available production
runtime monitoring
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1036447809 25208 64.84.39.162 (4 Nov 2002 22:10:09
GMT)
Date: Mon, 04 Nov 2002 14:11:32 -0800
From: Costin Manolache [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: costin: fix reverted
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Complaints-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
NNTP-posting-date: Mon, 4 Nov 2002
Glenn Nielsen wrote:
There are now several commerical tools for doing production runtime
monitoring of java applications which can obtain their data using JMX.
That's orthogonal - it doesn't matter what method we use to 'jmx-enable',
what matters is to have the getters for the info we need.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14059.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Kin-Man Chung wrote:
costin,
This fix seems to break errorPage handling in JSP, causing the errorPage
example to fail, and a couple of JSP watchdog tests too. I have
reverted
your fix.
I have not reverted the tomcat_4_branch.
If it breaks something - tomcat_4_branch should be the first to
58 matches
Mail list logo
