Dear Tomcat developers,
What do you think about described bug?
I know, my English is not good. Is it possible to understand my letter?
-Original Message-
From: Dimitry Ivanov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 02, 2003 8:31 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [PATCH]
Am Sonntag, 05.01.03 um 02:15 Uhr schrieb Roberto Casanova:
You should not revert completely to revision 1.32. There were two
changes done to StandardServer.java in your commit of revision 1.33.
We discussed only the first change (in method convertStr around line
824) and I think we agree it
remm2003/01/05 03:20:18
Modified:coyote/src/java/org/apache/coyote/tomcat5 OutputBuffer.java
Log:
- Remove unneeded import.
Revision ChangesPath
1.4 +0 -1
jakarta-tomcat-connectors/coyote/src/java/org/apache/coyote/tomcat5/OutputBuffer.java
Index:
remm2003/01/05 03:22:16
Modified:util/java/org/apache/tomcat/util/buf ByteChunk.java
CharChunk.java
Log:
- Add input support to ByteChunk and CharChunk.
- I don't know if the new method names are well chosen.
Revision ChangesPath
1.12
remm2003/01/05 03:24:23
Modified:coyote/src/java/org/apache/coyote/tomcat5
CoyoteInputStream.java CoyoteRequest.java
Added: coyote/src/java/org/apache/coyote/tomcat5 CoyoteReader.java
InputBuffer.java
Log:
- Implement more
remm2003/01/05 05:26:39
Modified:coyote/src/java/org/apache/coyote/tomcat5 InputBuffer.java
Log:
- Fix obvious bug.
Revision ChangesPath
1.2 +3 -3
jakarta-tomcat-connectors/coyote/src/java/org/apache/coyote/tomcat5/InputBuffer.java
Index:
I've committed input optimization similar to the OutputBuffer used in
the Coyote adapter. It appears to work ok (although
BufferedWriter.readLine still needs to be implemented).
I'm against porting this patch to 4.1.x, as it is a risky change (which
will need lots of testing) with only a few
Great !
Costin
Remy Maucherat wrote:
I've committed input optimization similar to the OutputBuffer used in
the Coyote adapter. It appears to work ok (although
BufferedWriter.readLine still needs to be implemented).
I'm against porting this patch to 4.1.x, as it is a risky change (which
remm2003/01/05 09:19:36
Modified:coyote/src/java/org/apache/coyote/tomcat5 CoyoteReader.java
Log:
- Implement readLine (but the algorithm is ugly, and not tested with long lines).
Revision ChangesPath
1.2 +66 -2
remm2003/01/05 09:20:41
Modified:coyote/src/java/org/apache/coyote/tomcat5 InputBuffer.java
Log:
- Fix skip and reset.
Revision ChangesPath
1.3 +14 -9
jakarta-tomcat-connectors/coyote/src/java/org/apache/coyote/tomcat5/InputBuffer.java
Index:
Costin Manolache wrote:
Great !
If you could come up with a better name for the substract method ;-)
It's supposed to be the opposite of append.
The optimization works good. It should help WebDAV as well as web
services, as long as they use the Tomcat reader.
Hopefully, I'll be able to write
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Costin Manolache wrote:
Great !
If you could come up with a better name for the substract method ;-)
It's supposed to be the opposite of append.
The optimization works good. It should help WebDAV as well as web
services, as long as they use the Tomcat reader.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9526.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Costin Manolache wrote:
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Costin Manolache wrote:
Great !
If you could come up with a better name for the substract method ;-)
It's supposed to be the opposite of append.
The optimization works good. It should help WebDAV as well as web
services, as long as they use
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15810.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15810.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15810.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
I enabled the debug lines of RealmBase.authenticate class
(org.apache.catalina.realm.RealmBase.java)
from tomcat 4.1.18 on redhat 7.3 with mozilla 1.2.1
as my client browser and the Realm used is MemoryRealm.
The value of qop is always 'ut' instead of 'auth'
which always results to a wrong
costin 2003/01/05 22:09:47
Added: resources mbeans.xml
Log:
A small test file for the 'jmx-ified' config / profile.
Each component will be defined as an mbean - with explicit control
over class loaders. This version uses ant ( it's much easier ), but
a standalone version
19 matches
Mail list logo