billbarker2004/02/12 00:24:03
Modified:src/share/org/apache/tomcat/startup EmbededTomcat.java
Main.java
Log:
Adding a 'startb' option to start and block. Primarily for use with procrun.
Revision ChangesPath
1.67 +32 -0
jfclere 2004/02/12 01:15:11
Modified:jk/native2 configure.in
Log:
Otherwise FreeBDS and OpenBSD tells:
ltconfig: you must specify a host type if you use `--no-verify'
and the configure failed.
Revision ChangesPath
1.20 +3 -2
Costin Manolache wrote:
NormW wrote:
Good morning Costin.
Apologies for the silence. I had hoped there might have been a little
more
input from others on this topic.
Same here :-)
We're working, Jean-Frederic, Kurt and I in arranging 2.0.4 build so new
features should wait for 2.0.5.
BTW, I
hgomez 2004/02/12 01:34:34
Modified:jk/native/isapi isapi.dsp
Removed: jk/native/isapi isapi.dsw
Log:
Remove unused sources and .dsw
Revision ChangesPath
1.3 +297 -313 jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native/isapi/isapi.dsp
Index: isapi.dsp
Henri Gomez wrote:
Costin Manolache wrote:
NormW wrote:
Good morning Costin.
Apologies for the silence. I had hoped there might have been a little
more
input from others on this topic.
Same here :-)
We're working, Jean-Frederic, Kurt and I in arranging 2.0.4 build so new
features should
jean-frederic clere wrote:
Henri Gomez wrote:
Costin Manolache wrote:
NormW wrote:
Good morning Costin.
Apologies for the silence. I had hoped there might have been a
little more
input from others on this topic.
Same here :-)
We're working, Jean-Frederic, Kurt and I in arranging 2.0.4
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26888.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26888.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26487.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26890.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hi all,
before this gets again forgotten, here's the reminder:
should we change the Win32 binary extention of the Apache modules to .so instead of
.dll ??
Apache changed that with version 1.3.15 already; and I got a lot of questions about
that at this time...
now the questions are the other
Hi Costin,
Good morning Costin.
Apologies for the silence. I had hoped there might have been a little
more input from others on this topic.
I think it is also necessary to discuss a bit the proper configuration of mod_jk2.
The docu is all other but clear, mixed up with the docu for mod_jk, and
Henri Gomez wrote:
jean-frederic clere wrote:
Henri Gomez wrote:
Costin Manolache wrote:
NormW wrote:
Good morning Costin.
Apologies for the silence. I had hoped there might have been a
little more
input from others on this topic.
Same here :-)
We're working, Jean-Frederic, Kurt and I
I converted the project to a .net 2003 project, and tried to build. No dice.
Got a really flaky error that made no sense to me.
I then looked at the .vcproj file that MS created, and tracked down
the issue (in my environment).
It seems that when the dsp file is converted to a vcproj file, InputDir
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16830.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Any comment(s)/suggestion(s) from Microsoft Tech Support?
Keep me apprised,
Marty Gainty
617-852-7822
- Original Message -
From: Aryeh Katz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2004 10:32 AM
Subject: HOWTO: building mod_jk2 with Visual studio .net 2003
I
Hi,
maybe we should export the .mak files and check into CVS, just as with Apache?
Please try if this works:
http://www.gknw.com/test/mod_jk2.mak
Guenter.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands,
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16830.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Guenter Knauf wrote:
Hi,
maybe we should export the .mak files and check into CVS, just as with Apache?
Please try if this works:
http://www.gknw.com/test/mod_jk2.mak
I already did that, and it worked fine. That's why I prefaced my comment
by stating this was an issue with vs2003 .net.
Do you
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16830.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Aryeh Katz wrote:
Guenter Knauf wrote:
Hi,
maybe we should export the .mak files and check into CVS, just as with
Apache? Please try if this works:
http://www.gknw.com/test/mod_jk2.mak
I already did that, and it worked fine. That's why I prefaced my comment
by stating this was an issue with
Martin Gainty wrote:
Any comment(s)/suggestion(s) from Microsoft Tech Support?
Keep me apprised,
Marty Gainty
617-852-7822
Didn't bother to try.
Let me search MSDN...
Nothing.
I'll post to the ms NG, and see what I get.
Don't hold your breath.
Aryeh
- Original Message -
From: Aryeh Katz
Chances are that if you encountered this error then there are others who
would encounter the same problem...Then again punting backward to makefiles
might be the only *robust* solution...
Keep me apprised,
-Martin
- Original Message -
From: Aryeh Katz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Martin Gainty
Hi,
maybe we should export the .mak files and check into CVS, just as with
Apache?
Please try if this works:
http://www.gknw.com/test/mod_jk2.mak
I already did that, and it worked fine. That's why I prefaced my comment
by stating this was an issue with vs2003 .net.
Do you want my makefile?
idarwin 2004/02/12 08:49:02
Modified:webapps/docs balancer-howto.xml
Log:
Minor typos in documentation.
Revision ChangesPath
1.4 +2 -2 jakarta-tomcat-catalina/webapps/docs/balancer-howto.xml
Index: balancer-howto.xml
As discussed previously.
What's the status of the JK 2 release ?
Rémy
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
idarwin 2004/02/12 08:51:36
Modified:webapps/docs cgi-howto.xml
Log:
Add a bit of explanatory text.
Revision ChangesPath
1.3 +7 -3 jakarta-tomcat-catalina/webapps/docs/cgi-howto.xml
Index: cgi-howto.xml
Remy Maucherat wrote:
As discussed previously.
What's the status of the JK 2 release ?
Also, I've been seeing mutterings of a JK 1.2.6 release -- any status on
that?
[Ping and pong, etc, would be nice to have in a released, citable version!]
--
Jess Holle
Remy Maucherat wrote:
As discussed previously.
What's the status of the JK 2 release ?
jk2 2.0.4 should be released by the end of the next week.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail:
Jess Holle wrote:
Remy Maucherat wrote:
As discussed previously.
What's the status of the JK 2 release ?
Also, I've been seeing mutterings of a JK 1.2.6 release -- any status on
that?
[Ping and pong, etc, would be nice to have in a released, citable version!]
1.2.6 will also include my
Costin Manolache wrote:
Henri Gomez wrote:
jean-frederic clere wrote:
Henri Gomez wrote:
Costin Manolache wrote:
NormW wrote:
Good morning Costin.
Apologies for the silence. I had hoped there might have been a
little more
input from others on this topic.
Same here :-)
We're
Guenter Knauf wrote:
Hi,
maybe we should export the .mak files and check into CVS, just as with
Apache?
Please try if this works:
http://www.gknw.com/test/mod_jk2.mak
I already did that, and it worked fine. That's why I prefaced my comment
by stating this was an issue with vs2003 .net.
Do you
Hi Aryeh,
I'm using 2.0.2, and your makefile fails at link time with a missing
symbol jk2_channel_socket_factory.
I assume that's a 2.0.4 issue.
Other than that, the compile was file.
ok, that sounds good. If you perhaps could do a test with recent CVS that would be
fine; then I would create
Hi all,
I have problems with some webapps where the welcome file doesnt work as with TC 3.3
and TC4.
these apps are have this structure:
app
\
documentation
\
index.html
\WEB-INF
\
web.xml
web.xml contains:
web-app
Guenter Knauf wrote:
Hi Aryeh,
I'm using 2.0.2, and your makefile fails at link time with a missing
symbol jk2_channel_socket_factory.
I assume that's a 2.0.4 issue.
Other than that, the compile was file.
ok, that sounds good. If you perhaps could do a test with recent CVS that would be fine;
Aryeh Katz wrote:
Guenter Knauf wrote:
Hi Aryeh,
I'm using 2.0.2, and your makefile fails at link time with a missing
symbol jk2_channel_socket_factory.
I assume that's a 2.0.4 issue.
Other than that, the compile was file.
ok, that sounds good. If you perhaps could do a test with recent CVS
Henri Gomez wrote:
Well, if we didn't get the POST somewhere on the WebServer, and if the
tomcat failed to respond, we couldn't resent the whole POST to the
second one.
If we get the first bytes ( but not the entire POST ), we can still save
them, and if the first tomcat fails - resend it.
Good morning Costin.
NormW wrote:
Good morning Costin.
Apologies for the silence. I had hoped there might have been a little
more
input from others on this topic.
Same here :-)
However the most common case is to have at least one tomcat, and there
is no real benefit in supporting an
markt 2004/02/12 12:52:52
Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/session
LocalStrings.properties StandardSession.java
Log:
Fix bug 14283. Catch and log exceptions in listeners. Reported by Eddie Ruvinsky.
Revision ChangesPath
1.13
markt 2004/02/12 12:54:21
Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/session
LocalStrings.properties StandardSession.java
Log:
Fix bug 14283. Catch and log exceptions in listeners. Reported by Eddie Ruvinsky.
Ported from TC4.
Revision Changes
Not all Tomcat 5 MBeans are serializable and I think we should make all our
exposed MBeans serializable if we want to support remote access to
MBeanServer using JSR 160. We'll need to modify Tomcat MBeans to only have
serializable attributes and return types.
Comments?
Thanks,
Amy
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14283.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Howdy,
Not all Tomcat 5 MBeans are serializable and I think we should make all
our
exposed MBeans serializable if we want to support remote access to
MBeanServer using JSR 160. We'll need to modify Tomcat MBeans to only
have
serializable attributes and return types.
Comments?
+1, willing to
Amy Roh wrote:
Not all Tomcat 5 MBeans are serializable and I think we should make all our
exposed MBeans serializable if we want to support remote access to
MBeanServer using JSR 160. We'll need to modify Tomcat MBeans to only have
serializable attributes and return types.
Comments?
That's not
-1 for doing it now,
+0 to do it after tag and after next stable release.
Filip
- Original Message -
From: Remy Maucherat [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2004 1:03 PM
Subject: Re: Remote Access using JSR 160
Amy Roh wrote:
Not
fhanik 2004/02/12 13:10:32
Modified:modules/cluster/src/share/org/apache/catalina/cluster/session
DeltaSession.java
Log:
added binding event error protection, port from StandardSession
Revision ChangesPath
1.17 +22 -8
Would it be possible to wait until tomorrow to start doing that (ie,
after I tag 5.0.19) ?
Sure, it can wait. I wasn't planning on doing it right away. I need to see
whether we can accomplish this first - it'll be very nice to do so.
BTW, another problem: on StandardContext and
I suggest using the java.lang.reflect.Proxy object as remote,
then you can make almost any object with an interface remote :)
Filip
- Original Message -
From: Amy Roh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2004 1:18 PM
Subject: Re:
markt 2004/02/12 13:38:12
Modified:catalina/src/bin setclasspath.bat setclasspath.sh
Log:
Fix bug 14246. Make clear in error message that JDK is required. Reported by Eric
Bloch.
Revision ChangesPath
1.9 +2 -1
markt 2004/02/12 13:38:56
Modified:catalina/src/bin setclasspath.bat setclasspath.sh
Log:
Fix bug 14246. Make clear in error message that JDK is required. Reported by Eric
Bloch. Ported from TC4.
Revision ChangesPath
1.6 +2 -1
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14246.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14329.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14595.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Am Mi, den 11.02.2004 schrieb Henri Gomez um 10:57:
Ok, I commited changes in CVS which should fix problem in POST recovery.
Thanks to take a look at it
OK, POST recovery seems to work now in the scenario i have described:
Tomcat fails after receiving the request but before sending a reply.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14714.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
- Original Message -
From: Costin Manolache [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2004 11:03 AM
Subject: Re: Mod_Jk2 - Default Worker
Henri Gomez wrote:
Well, if we didn't get the POST somewhere on the WebServer, and if the
tomcat failed to respond,
The (modified) text of the proposal is below. The [VOTE] runs until
Thursday, Feb 19 6:00 PM PDT.
ballot
[ ] +1 I agree with this release and will support it.
[ ] +0 I agree with this release, but can't support it.
[ ] -0 I disagree with this release, but won't block it.
[ ] -1 I don't think
- Original Message -
From: Bill Barker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2004 8:42 PM
Subject: [VOTE] Release the HEAD of j-t as Tomcat 3.3.2
The (modified) text of the proposal is below. The [VOTE] runs until
Thursday, Feb
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26905.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26905.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
To whom is may concern,
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. Please see:
http://jakarta.apache.org/gump/nagged.html
Project: jakarta-tomcat-5 has an issue affecting it's community integration.
State: Failed
The URL for full details is:
61 matches
Mail list logo
