DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28123.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
- Original Message -
From: Anton Ushakov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 02, 2004 10:46 AM
Subject: Re: Coyote's ServerSocketFactory problem
First I must say you've been extremely helpful, thank you for your
prompt responses! I hate
attachment: qugoyyllkl.bmp-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15278.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15278.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
mturk 2004/04/02 22:47:23
Modified:jk/native2/server/isapi jk_service_iis.c
Log:
Read from client in the loop until all the requested data is read or timeout
occurs. This fixes random errors during read large post data.
Revision ChangesPath
1.30 +19 -11
billbarker2004/04/02 22:47:24
Modified:util/java/org/apache/tomcat/util/compat JdkCompat.java
Log:
Add detection for JDK 1.5
Revision ChangesPath
1.12 +9 -0
jakarta-tomcat-connectors/util/java/org/apache/tomcat/util/compat/JdkCompat.java
Index:
Mladen Turk wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Andy Armstrong
Heretic perhaps, but I'd like to integrate PHP (perhaps even Perl)
directly with TC.
What do you mean by 'integrate'? Have tomcat handle PHP
requests by some means?
mod_php inside TC.
I found out that TC is only 8%
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yes i will be willing to help with
the test. I can install the version on the dev server which
is IIS 5.0 with TC 5.0 and W2K and use these same machines to
do the test.
As of the email issue, I am subscribed but i get way too many
emails i can't read them
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For help
understanding the request please visit
http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project jakarta-tomcat-5 has an issue affecting its community integration, and has
From Costin Manolache
mod_php inside TC.
I found out that TC is only 8% slower the Apache2.x.
So if I need PHP and JSP, the Apache2 is total overhead.
MT.
I hope this is an April 1 joke :-)
Maybe you can also integrate mod_perl and mod_dotnet ( or
whatever is called
Mladen Turk wrote:
-Original Message-
From: jean-frederic clere
What do you want to do?
- Call native methods in TC to get PHP running.
- Write a servlet engine that understands PHP. (Well the
problem would be the libraries).
If a majority of my web content is a dynamic one,
Thorsten Kamann wrote:
Hello,
Henri Gomez schrieb:
Well I didn't like very well the hardcoded way, so I'd like to have it
externally.
We could :
Define a stylesheet property var in workers2.properties, which will
contains a full URL and if this var is null, fallback to previous method.
Is
Henri Gomez wrote:
No problem for me to provide the result in XML, since I've got friend
aroud which could provide me some nice XSL still sheet.
Second advantage, the jkstatus could be used by others apps for example
for monitoring purposes.
+0 for XML (lack of time to works on this ;().
-0 - if
From Costin Manolache
Sent: Saturday, April 03, 2004 9:14 AM
If a majority of my web content is a dynamic one, delivered through
JSP, PHP, or what ever, why would I need a dummy web server
as an intermediate?
The webserver is not only for static content. If you use
Apache
Mladen Turk wrote:
From Costin Manolache
Sent: Saturday, April 03, 2004 9:14 AM
If a majority of my web content is a dynamic one, delivered through
JSP, PHP, or what ever, why would I need a dummy web server
as an intermediate?
The webserver is not only for static content. If you use
Hello Henri
Henri Gomez schrieb:
No problem for me to provide the result in XML, since I've got friend
aroud which could provide me some nice XSL still sheet.
Second advantage, the jkstatus could be used by others apps for example
for monitoring purposes.
+0 for XML (lack of time to works on
Good evening Henri,
Wouldn't it be
Location /examples/*
JkUriSet group lb
JkUriSet debug 1
Location
or
JkSet uri:/examples/*.debug 1
or
JkSet2 uri:/examples/* debug 1
AFAIK of the docs. :-)
Norm
- Original Message -
From: Henri Gomez [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28129.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28154.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28156.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28156.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28131.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
fhanik 2004/04/01 13:06:50
Modified:modules/cluster/src/share/org/apache/catalina/cluster/session
DeltaSession.java
Log:
bugfix for 28131, thanks to rainer.jung -at- kippdata.de
So I assume you're going to want a 5.0.22 ? :(
This
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28156.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Mark Thomas wrote:
Remy,
Looking at bug 13040 I did a bugzilla search and came across bug 11411. I am
still thinking about bug 13040 but saw that bug 11411 could be fixed (I had
previously closed it without looking at the source closely enough) without
getting into the equals()/startsWith()
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28157.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
At 10:36 PM 29/03/2004, you wrote:
Henri Gomez wrote:
Steve Spicer wrote:
On standard install it doesn't. I'm not sure why but it still seems the
JK connector is connecting to tomcat even though the access checker hook
is returning a 403.
Any ideas?
I will make some tests on it.
I make some
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28158.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28158.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28157.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28158.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28158.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28158.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
i'm trying to compile mod_jk (just the apache side, not the tomcat
side).
I downloaded jakarta-tomcat-connectors-jk2-2.0.4-src. apr-0.9.4 and
apr-util-0.9.4 and was able to successfully run configure (i'm building
against apache 1.3).
however trying to do make results in an error about
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28158.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28158.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28159.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28158.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
fhanik 2004/04/02 06:42:20
Modified:modules/cluster/src/share/org/apache/catalina/cluster/session
DeltaManager.java
Log:
Fixed bug 28156. Session access count should be 0 not 1 when the requests are done
Revision ChangesPath
1.19 +2 -2
Hi Marco,
It sounds like the configure script is telling Make (*simplification*) to
only build static files (.la), which is bizarre. Try running configure with
the following option to force it to build the shared (.so) libraries:
./configure --enable-shared=yes ... *plus other options as usual*
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28156.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
From: Marco Baringer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
i'm trying to compile mod_jk (just the apache side, not the tomcat
side).
I downloaded jakarta-tomcat-connectors-jk2-2.0.4-src. apr-0.9.4 and
apr-util-0.9.4 and was able to successfully run configure (i'm building
against apache 1.3).
however
NormW wrote:
Good evening Henri,
Wouldn't it be
Location /examples/*
JkUriSet group lb
JkUriSet debug 1
Location
I tried but it didn't works ;(
or
JkSet uri:/examples/*.debug 1
or
JkSet2 uri:/examples/* debug 1
Well it didn't works neither.
I'm using these 2 on a VirtualHost
Kurt Miller wrote:
From: Marco Baringer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
i'm trying to compile mod_jk (just the apache side, not the tomcat
side).
I downloaded jakarta-tomcat-connectors-jk2-2.0.4-src. apr-0.9.4 and
apr-util-0.9.4 and was able to successfully run configure (i'm building
against apache 1.3).
Henri Gomez wrote:
NormW wrote:
Good evening Henri,
Wouldn't it be
Location /examples/*
JkUriSet group lb
JkUriSet debug 1
Location
I tried but it didn't works ;(
or
JkSet uri:/examples/*.debug 1
or
JkSet2 uri:/examples/* debug 1
Well it didn't works neither.
I'm using these
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28159.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28129.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
*** Atenção: se você usa um autorespondente em seu e-mail, pode
ser que receba esta mensagem mais de uma vez. Isso acontece porque
quando seu autorespondente envia uma mensagem para este endereço,
nosso robô despacha automaticamente este e-mail novamente.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28161.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28158.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
*** Atenção: se você usa um autorespondente em seu e-mail, pode
ser que receba esta mensagem mais de uma vez. Isso acontece porque
quando seu autorespondente envia uma mensagem para este endereço,
nosso robô despacha automaticamente este e-mail novamente.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28147.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28161.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28161.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
On Venerdì, apr 2, 2004, at 16:45 Europe/Rome, Kurt Miller wrote:
Is there a jk/build/jk2/apache13/usr/local/libexec/mod_jk2.dylib?
no. only .a and .la
This has been reported and fixed post 2.0.4. A quick workaound
would be to edit jk/native2/configure, find all the referances to
libapr-1.so,
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28161.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28161.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
twas libtool after all.
I grabbed a clean cvs tree, deleted jk/native2/libtool, copied in my
version of gnu libtool (1.5.2) and everything went smoothly. compiled,
built mod_jk2.so and apache seems to like it.
--
Marco
Ring the bells that still can ring.
Forget the perfect offering.
There is a
markt 2004/04/02 09:42:46
Modified:webapps/tomcat-docs class-loader-howto.xml
Log:
- Fix remaining incorrect reference to CATALINA_HOME rather than CATALINA_BASE
- Reported by Daniel Rall
Revision ChangesPath
1.14 +1 -1
I have just fixed this in CVS. Thanks for the report.
Mark
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Rall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 02, 2004 12:26 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [PATCH][Tomcat 4.1 docs] Class loader HOWTO
The published Tomcat
From: Marco Baringer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
twas libtool after all.
I grabbed a clean cvs tree, deleted jk/native2/libtool, copied in my
version of gnu libtool (1.5.2) and everything went smoothly. compiled,
built mod_jk2.so and apache seems to like it.
Great! I'm assuming that you got it
I will be out of the office starting 02/04/2004 and will not return until
30/04/2004.
I will respond to your message when I return.
_
The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to
which it is addressed and
On Venerdì, apr 2, 2004, at 19:43 Europe/Rome, Kurt Miller wrote:
Great! I'm assuming that you got it working for apache2, right?
From your last email it apears that apache13 on macos X might
need some changes. Could you try apache13 and let us know
how it goes?
no, i got it working an apache13.
OK then. Now for the tricky bit. Bug 13040
(http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13040) highlights a rather
knotty problem. Having mulled this over for the last few days I have come to the
conclusion that we should be using equals() rather than startsWith()
My reasons for this are:
-
From: Marco Baringer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Venerdì, apr 2, 2004, at 19:43 Europe/Rome, Kurt Miller wrote:
Great! I'm assuming that you got it working for apache2, right?
From your last email it apears that apache13 on macos X might
need some changes. Could you try apache13 and let us know
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28147.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
First I must say you've been extremely helpful, thank you for your
prompt responses! I hate to bug you but I had another implementation
question. I looked at JSSESocketFactory and how SSL is done in the
connector, but it doesnt address one particular issue I'm having.
Basically I have JAAS
Mark Thomas wrote:
OK then. Now for the tricky bit. Bug 13040
(http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13040) highlights a rather
knotty problem. Having mulled this over for the last few days I have come to the
conclusion that we should be using equals() rather than startsWith()
My
From: Remy Maucherat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 02, 2004 8:30 PM
To: Tomcat Developers List
Subject: Re: cvs commit:
jakarta-tomcat-catalina/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina
/core ApplicationContext.java
Mark Thomas wrote:
OK then. Now for the tricky bit. Bug
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28168.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Mark Thomas wrote:
Fixing bug 13040 requires an additional patch that uses equals() for the whole
algorithm. Hence the complications. This is what I was discussing above.
The matching rule can't be fully implemented AFAIK. I think the current
algorithm is a nice compromise.
Please give examples
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28170.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28170.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28170.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28168.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28170.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28170.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28170.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28170.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28170.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Good morning Henri.
I was speaking from theory, as the only JkSet/JkUriSet entries that I've
used so far are setting the worker and some logger values, and they work
without problem. One thing you might see is that the JkUriSet/JkSet/JkSet2
directives only update the actual object referred to and
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15278.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28170.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15278.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
85 matches
Mail list logo
