mturk 2004/09/12 23:06:13
Modified:procrun/bin tomcat5w.exe
Log:
FIxed bug 31185
Revision ChangesPath
1.6 +5 -5 jakarta-tomcat-connectors/procrun/bin/tomcat5w.exe
Binary file
mturk 2004/09/12 23:06:42
Modified:procrun/bin Tag: TOMCAT_5_0 tomcat5w.exe
Log:
Backport fixed bug 31185
Revision ChangesPath
No revision
No revision
1.2.2.2 +5 -5 jakarta-tomcat-connectors/procrun/bin/tomcat5w.exe
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31185.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31191.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
remm2004/09/13 00:30:53
Modified:jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper
JspCompilationContext.java
Log:
- Oops: must now discard the JSP loader before starting a compilation.
Revision ChangesPath
1.54 +1 -0
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31191.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hi all,
I Tryed to make installer for Java and tomcat in one. But I have got problem with Java
aplication. In error log of tomcat is:
INFO: Jk running ID=0 time=0/20 config=null
java.lang.StringIndexOutOfBoundsException: String index out of range: 4
I just copied the files onto dist and run
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31191.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Since when is Tomcat 5.5.x an alpha release? Last I heard it was considered a
stable release for a while now.
Regardless of the lack of basis or merit for his complaints: Yoav,
you're not being obvious enough that these builds are alpha.
Rémy
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31191.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31191.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31191.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
I've found what I believe is a bug in the 2.0.4 connector for IIS that
prevents it from handling a POST with a transfer encoding of chunked
Issue been mentioned couple of times:
http://www.apache.org/~mturk/isapi_redirector2.zip
This is 2.0.5 pre-release (if the 2.0.5 ever sees daylight :).
Hi,
Since I've been involved with Tomcat:
- Release announcements have included the Release Manager's opinion of
stability (alpha/beta/stable),
- Release announcements were made to tomcat-dev, tomcat-user,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- No release candidate terminology was used or implied
- About a week
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31191.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I should know more today, as I actually have time to
spend on this, and finding it will cure an infrequent production problem
we're having with a new vendor that hits this. Once I know more I'll post
again.
Well, I wouldn't spend much time trying to fix it, cause we'll
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31191.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31191.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hi,
As a reminder, we agreed last week to cut the next Tomcat 5.5 release,
5.5.2, tomorrow (Tuesday, September 14th). If everyone could finish
committing their changes by noon EDT, they'd be great. If someone is
still working and wants to change the release date or time, let's hear
it ;)
Is it
Shapira, Yoav wrote:
If everyone could finish
committing their changes by noon EDT, they'd be great.
Hi, I saw couple of your posts mentioning EDT. I presume it's
some strange time zone :).
Can you use a simple thing like GMT?
Regards,
MT.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31191.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hi,
Shapira, Yoav wrote:
If everyone could finish
committing their changes by noon EDT, they'd be great.
Hi, I saw couple of your posts mentioning EDT. I presume it's
some strange time zone :).
Can you use a simple thing like GMT?
Sure, no problem ;)
EDT = my timzone = GMT - 4
(Full
Shapira, Yoav wrote:
Sure, no problem ;)
EDT = my timzone = GMT - 4
(Full reference at http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/city.html?n=43)
So Tuesday, September 14th, noon EDT = Tuesday, September 14th 1600h
GMT.
Cool?
So:
http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/city.html?n=281
meaning:
Hi,
So:
http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/city.html?n=281
meaning:
Tuesday, September 14th, (EDT noon - CEST 2200h)
Correct? :).
Wouldn't it be EDT + 4 = GMT, CEST = GMT + 2, so EDT + 6 = CEST, so EDT
noon = CEST 1800h ?
Yoav
This e-mail, including any attachments, is a confidential
Shapira, Yoav wrote:
Hi,
So:
http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/city.html?n=281
meaning:
Tuesday, September 14th, (EDT noon - CEST 2200h)
Correct? :).
Wouldn't it be EDT + 4 = GMT, CEST = GMT + 2, so EDT + 6 = CEST, so EDT
noon = CEST 1800h ?
You see my point?
Let's be global :).
Regards,
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31191.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31191.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
mturk 2004/09/13 08:04:08
Modified:.build.xml
Log:
Do not forget to increment version.build after release.
It is used for generating proper file names.
Revision ChangesPath
1.211 +1 -1 jakarta-tomcat-5/build.xml
Index: build.xml
keith 2004/09/13 08:19:00
Modified:.build.xml
Log:
In nsis2, makensis-bz2 is no more. It is replaced by SetCompressor in the nsi
file, which has been added to tomcat.nsi; however here we need to point to
makensis.
Revision ChangesPath
1.85 +1 -1
Shapira, Yoav wrote:
Hi,
Is it OK with everyone to explicitly call this 5.5.2-alpha in the
release announcements and Jakarta news/download pages? The stability
vote will be as usual, one week after the release, and the stability
vote results announced (and web site possibly changed) as usual at
Hi,
Ooh, not good. I'll look into these a bit when I get a chance, but if
someone else has a good idea please jump in ;)
Yoav Shapira
Millennium Research Informatics
-Original Message-
From: Mladen Turk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 13, 2004 11:40 AM
To: Tomcat
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31198.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31201.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
mturk 2004/09/13 10:52:09
Modified:procrun/bin tomcat5.exe
Log:
In debug mode redirect messages to console output.
Revision ChangesPath
1.7 +77 -85jakarta-tomcat-connectors/procrun/bin/tomcat5.exe
Binary file
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31202.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31202.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
markt 2004/08/23 12:29:35
Modified:http11/src/java/org/apache/coyote/http11
Http11Processor.java
Log:
Fix bug 16254 - Server header appears twice after a call to response.setHeader()
Revision ChangesPath
1.105 +3 -1
remm2004/09/13 11:25:08
Modified:http11/src/java/org/apache/coyote/http11
Http11Processor.java
Log:
- Revert patch. I disalike patches which cause a performance hit for the sole
interest of embeddors who don't contribute anything. The
X-Powered-By
This is an often asked for feature. My pref is for it to be a configuration
in the Connector. Then the only added overhead is in during init.
For example ...
protected serverHeader = Constants.SERVER;
...
setServerHeader() ...
getServerHeader() ...
...
I disalike patches which cause a
performance hit for the sole interest of embeddors who don't
contribute anything.
Agreed. But this wasn't the reasoning behind the patch.
From the original bug report (16254) I believe the reporter had a security
motive. To repeat some of my earlier comments
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31204.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Well, I wouldn't spend much time trying to fix it, cause we'll probably
drop the jk2 altogether, and focus on jk for platforms other then
apache 2.2. The apache 2.2 will have it's own connector inside standard
distribution.
So either the provided dll works or not. Of course you may do with the
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31204.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Mark Thomas wrote:
I disalike patches which cause a
performance hit for the sole interest of embeddors who don't
contribute anything.
Agreed. But this wasn't the reasoning behind the patch.
From the original bug report (16254) I believe the reporter had a security
motive. To repeat some of
mturk 2004/09/13 12:11:41
Modified:.tomcat.nsi
Log:
Check the return value from service install and give user a
chance to fix the problems, ignore or abort installation.
The problems can be either the lack of admin permission or the
service Tomcat5 already installed.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, I wouldn't spend much time trying to fix it, cause we'll probably
drop the jk2 altogether, and focus on jk for platforms other then
apache 2.2. The apache 2.2 will have it's own connector inside standard
distribution.
Anyway, I have a patch that makes two small
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31198.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Mladen Turk wrote:
Shapira, Yoav wrote:
Hi,
Is it OK with everyone to explicitly call this 5.5.2-alpha in the
release announcements and Jakarta news/download pages? The stability
vote will be as usual, one week after the release, and the stability
vote results announced (and web site possibly
Hi,
As a (relevant) side note, I've been assuming the TCKs cover session handling. Is
this a bad assumptions?
Yoav Shapira
Millennium Research Informatics
-Original Message-
From: Remy Maucherat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 13, 2004 4:20 PM
To: Tomcat Developers
Shapira, Yoav wrote:
Hi,
As a (relevant) side note, I've been assuming the TCKs cover session handling. Is
this a bad assumptions?
Of course, it does test session handling :)
I think there's something odd, though.
Rémy
-
To
remm2004/09/13 14:06:29
Modified:.build.xml
Log:
- Wait less before starting tests (TC starts much faster now).
Revision ChangesPath
1.212 +1 -1 jakarta-tomcat-5/build.xml
Index: build.xml
remm2004/09/13 14:07:43
Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/authenticator
AuthenticatorBase.java
Log:
- Fix bug where going through the authenticator would create a session each time.
This fixes all tester failures.
Revision Changes
remm2004/09/13 14:39:40
Modified:http11/src/java/org/apache/coyote/http11
Http11Processor.java
Log:
- Cleanup a little access to the headers using a local variable.
- Use direct access to the headers whenever possible (extra checks were done in
Mladen Turk wrote:
Shapira, Yoav wrote:
Hi,
Is it OK with everyone to explicitly call this 5.5.2-alpha in the
release announcements and Jakarta news/download pages? The stability
vote will be as usual, one week after the release, and the stability
vote results announced (and web site possibly
From: Remy Maucherat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
My position remains that the above reasons are sufficient
justification for the
patch to remain.
My position remains the same as well.
Making the value of the server header configurable, as per Tim's suggestion
earlier in this thread,
Mark Thomas wrote:
Making the value of the server header configurable, as per Tim's suggestion
earlier in this thread, would meet the user requirement described in bug 16254
which is my main concern. Providing this is done in a way that doesn't impact
performance, would you find this an acceptable
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31209.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
-- Virus Warning Message (on uusnwa0p) --
Found virus WORM_NETSKY.Z in file Data.txt
.exe (in Data.zip)
The uncleanable file is
funkman 2004/09/13 17:04:08
Modified:xdocs-faq misc.xml project.xml
Log:
Add wiki to left nav.
Move wiki links to new wiki.
Move the powered by blurb to the wiki
Revision ChangesPath
1.24 +3 -21 jakarta-tomcat-site/xdocs-faq/misc.xml
Index: misc.xml
funkman 2004/09/13 17:04:45
Modified:docs bugreport.html index.html irc.html resources.html
docs/faq bugs.html classnotfound.html connectors.html
database.html deployment.html index.html
logging.html memory.html
funkman 2004/09/13 18:08:16
Modified:docs bugreport.html index.html irc.html resources.html
Log:
Fix(add back) LICENSE since my last commit didn't have jakarta-site up
to date locally.
Revision ChangesPath
1.25 +17 -1
** This is an automated response. Please do not reply to this message. **
Dear Customer,
Thank you for contacting share-it!
Your message was directed to an address that is no longer in use. Due to a high
volume of various non-business related,
and unsolicited messages, e-mails sent to
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31209.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
63 matches
Mail list logo
