DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32495.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Respected Sirs,
Im in the process of understanding the complete Tomcats source code so that i
can write my own servlet container and JSP container.
Where i shud i start from??I downloaded some source codes ..Whn i tried to go
thro it i felt like im in a maze..I just didnt understand how
Gokul Jeyapaul wrote:
Respected Sirs,
Im in the process of understanding the complete Tomcats source code so that i can write my own servlet container and JSP container.
Why do you need to do that?
Where i shud i start from??I downloaded some source codes ..Whn i tried to go thro it i felt
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32510.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32500.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32500.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
No, this breaks the spec. There are many other simple alternatives. Please
follow up to the tomcat-user list for more information.
-Tim
Svante Olofsson wrote:
Hi!
First off, I think Tomcat is a great product. Thanks!
Secondly, do you have any plans on adding something like to web.xml:
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32500.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32500.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32500.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32500.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
I have a need to passivate HttpSessions on a more aggressive basis than
that of timing them out.
Default behavior is to time out a sessions after 30 minutes of
inactivity -- which is fine.
Rather I need to be able to passivate sessions to disk after say 10-15
minutes or rather passivate all
Shapira, Yoav wrote:
... final reminder:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=tomcat-devm=110114183416566w=2.
Please make sure to commit any relevant checkouts by then and update the
changelog accordingly. Thanks,
Are we going to need a new 5.0.x build to fix the admin webapp issue ?
Rémy
Jess Holle wrote:
I have a need to passivate HttpSessions on a more aggressive basis
than that of timing them out.
Default behavior is to time out a sessions after 30 minutes of
inactivity -- which is fine.
Rather I need to be able to passivate sessions to disk after say 10-15
minutes or
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32418.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hi,
Are we going to need a new 5.0.x build to fix the admin webapp issue ?
Bah ;) I posted a note to tomcat-user telling people of the fix, which
is just a configuration. The next step would be to post the amended
configuration file itself (struts-config.xml) on the download pages, and
I'll
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32500.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32500.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32505.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Shapira, Yoav wrote:
Bah ;) I posted a note to tomcat-user telling people of the fix, which
is just a configuration. The next step would be to post the amended
configuration file itself (struts-config.xml) on the download pages, and
I'll do that today assuming no one objects. But a whole new
LOL, man I couldn't help laughing.
you guys are slacking off!! just kidding.
peter
On Fri, 03 Dec 2004 16:04:36 +0100, Remy Maucherat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Shapira, Yoav wrote:
Bah ;) I posted a note to tomcat-user telling people of the fix, which
is just a configuration. The next
yeah where _did_ 5.5.5 go ;) :) were you out on the razz yoav?
-Original Message-
From: Peter Lin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 03 December 2004 15:08
To: Tomcat Developers List
Subject: Re: Tomcat 5.0.30 today...
LOL, man I couldn't help laughing.
you guys are slacking
Hi,
No no ;) 5.5.5 is there, posted about an hour after I tagged it. I just
wanted to give the mirrors ample time(*) to sync up before I made the release
announcement.
(*) = the mirrors seem to be taking longer to sync up. I don't know if it's a
scale issue, as the Apache repositories are
yoavs 2004/12/03 07:17:34
Modified:catalina/src/conf web.xml
webapps/docs changelog.xml jasper-howto.xml
Log:
Updated Jikes section of Jasper-HowTo, and updated conf/web.xml to point
people there.
Revision ChangesPath
1.54 +2 -5
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Jess Holle wrote:
I have a need to passivate HttpSessions on a more aggressive basis
than that of timing them out.
Default behavior is to time out a sessions after 30 minutes of
inactivity -- which is fine.
Rather I need to be able to passivate sessions to disk after say
Jess Holle wrote:
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Jess Holle wrote:
I have a need to passivate HttpSessions on a more aggressive basis
than that of timing them out.
Default behavior is to time out a sessions after 30 minutes of
inactivity -- which is fine.
Rather I need to be able to passivate sessions
remm2004/12/03 07:35:25
Modified:webapps/manager/WEB-INF/classes/org/apache/catalina/manager
ManagerServlet.java
Log:
- Quick fix for bug 32505 (only occurs with the HTML manager).
- Since I don't have anything urgent to do, I'll try to improve the
remm2004/12/03 07:39:31
Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/core
ContainerBase.java
Log:
- Experiment with adding child to the map before starting it (and removing it
if there's a problem).
Revision ChangesPath
1.38 +9 -1
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32510.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Remy Maucherat wrote:
It's called persistent manager, and it's the same place as the
standard manager, in the session package.
There's even docs:
http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-5.5-doc/config/manager.html
Thanks for the pointer!
It appears to have what I need/want except for one
i notice in the 5.0.30 code, this bug may also exist since the web.xml is 2.4,
although I have not tested. was this patched to the 5.0.30 also?
cheers, Allistair.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 01 December 2004 22:42
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jess Holle wrote:
Remy Maucherat wrote:
It's called persistent manager, and it's the same place as the
standard manager, in the session package.
There's even docs:
http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-5.5-doc/config/manager.html
Thanks for the pointer!
It appears to have what I need/want
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Jess Holle wrote:
Remy Maucherat wrote:
It's called persistent manager, and it's the same place as the
standard manager, in the session package.
There's even docs:
http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-5.5-doc/config/manager.html
Thanks for the pointer!
It appears to have
yoavs 2004/12/03 09:02:25
Modified:webapps/admin Tag: TOMCAT_5_0 tree-control-test.jsp
webapps/admin/WEB-INF/classes/org/apache/webapp/admin Tag:
TOMCAT_5_0 TreeControlTag.java
webapps/docs Tag: TOMCAT_5_0 changelog.xml
Log:
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32381.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hi,
I've back-ported this to 5.0. Thanks,
Yoav Shapira http://www.yoavshapira.com
-Original Message-
From: Allistair Crossley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 03, 2004 11:17 AM
To: Tomcat Developers List
Subject: RE: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32381] - Couldn't expand/collapse
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16901.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16901.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
luehe 2004/12/03 10:12:07
Modified:util/java/org/apache/tomcat/util/http ServerCookie.java
Log:
Escape any double quotes in Version 1 cookies
Revision ChangesPath
1.8 +27 -1
jakarta-tomcat-connectors/util/java/org/apache/tomcat/util/http/ServerCookie.java
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32518.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32518.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32141.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32521.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32518.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32518.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32521.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hello Everyone,
Feel free to slam me if this should go to the users list, I felt it
should go to the dev list as it pertains to Tomcat src.
I've been working on getting Tomcat 5.0.30 going on z/OS / USS (EBCDIC)
(one of our supported platforms as a user / bundler of Tomcat). We've
been
Jess Holle wrote:
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Jess Holle wrote:
Remy Maucherat wrote:
It's called persistent manager, and it's the same place as the
standard manager, in the session package.
There's even docs:
http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-5.5-doc/config/manager.html
Thanks for the pointer!
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16901.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32500.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32500.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
getBytes() with no arguments is very bad. USS or no USS, it should be a
bugzilla.
-Original Message-
From: Rich Taylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 03, 2004 2:56 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Tomcat 5.0.x on USS / EBCDIC
Hello Everyone,
Feel free to slam me if
52 matches
Mail list logo
