To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project jakarta-tomcat-jk-native has an issue affecting its community
integration.
This
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25965.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
remm2005/01/06 03:33:23
Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/realm JDBCRealm.java
Log:
- Also log the exception.
Revision ChangesPath
1.10 +2 -2
jakarta-tomcat-catalina/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/realm/JDBCRealm.java
Index:
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32646.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31659.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17014.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32569.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
remm2005/01/06 04:42:13
Modified:.build.xml
coyote build.xml
Log:
- Don't create the coyote JAR for TC 5.
Revision ChangesPath
1.220 +1 -4 jakarta-tomcat-5/build.xml
Index: build.xml
remm2005/01/06 04:43:15
Modified:http11/src/java/org/apache/coyote/http11
Http11Processor.java
Log:
- Content length should be ignored if there is chunking.
Revision ChangesPath
1.117 +8 -8
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32963.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32963.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
13126577889
--10%
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED])
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Mladen Turk wrote:
Jess Holle wrote:
For those of us lurking waiting for the outcome of this vote, it
would seem to be extraordinarily slow
Yes. Seems like seasons time :).
I didn't vote because I didn't test it at all. Maybe I will tomorrow.
Question: would it be
On Jan 5, 2005, at 9:04 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bugzilla ran a sanity check last night, which caused some old mails to
get sent. I don't know whether Bugzilla was correct about not having
sent these, but this should not happen again.
My apologies for the inconvenience.
S.
--
[EMAIL
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32967.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32968.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32968.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32969.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32967.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
pero2005/01/06 12:15:23
Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/realm Tag: TOMCAT_5_0
RealmBase.java
Log:
Hups a strange typo..
Revision ChangesPath
No revision
No revision
1.33.2.4 +2 -2
Dear Tomcat developers,
I would like to implement context config file encryption. It is a pretty useful
feature since passwords to various resources are stored in those files
Unfortunately the way how context config files are read is hard coded
(InputSource for Digester is created from
On Wed, 5 Jan 2005 18:54:08 -0500, Andrew Jaquith
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Greetings,
A while back I did some patch work on the catalina.realm.JAASRealm
class. I learned a lot in the process.
Thanks for your patches -- I've been using them! In my JAAS
LoginModule, I also tried to use JNDI
Alex,
I would vote '-1' for any such addition Tomcat.
Let me explain why by way of a simple example. Let us assume that Tomcat
requires a plain text user name and password to connect to a database.
First of all, consider the security risks if the information is stored
in an unencrypted file
Mark,
I disagree, I have always felt it would be a good idea to have the
database passwords and such encrypted when in the context files. Those
context files fly all around stuffed in WAR files and stored in CVS
repositories and 'Hey Bob, does this context file look right?'. That's
an awful lot
Mark, Bernard,
I think you make a good point here. I would like to clarify my purpose.
I do not need to hide my passwords from people who maintain the servers - in
fact they enter passwords into plain text config files which are encrypted on
tomcat startup and stay encrypted. I need to make
Dear Tomcat developers,
I have a need to access web context info (such as name, physical path)
from my various JNDI object factories. I was going through Tomcat 5.5
code and found that you publish repository info under comp:env/Resources
and it has all required information. Could you please tell
Roytman, Alex wrote:
Dear Tomcat developers,
I would like to implement context config file encryption. It is a pretty useful feature since passwords to various resources are stored in those files
Unfortunately the way how context config files are read is hard coded (InputSource for Digester is
Alex,
Thanks for the clarification of the requirement. I think I still need
some convincing ;).
I view the naive level as, at best, security by obscurity. Whilst it
might make people feel secure, it doesn't add much, if anything in terms
of real security.
On first impression the second option is
Rémy,
I do not think that adding a Context listener will do me any good. I need to
plug in my own ContextConfig. I know I can plug in my own ContextConfig but I
would like to extend tomcat's one with minimum of changes or I will be running
risk of being incompatible with next version of
29 matches
Mail list logo
