DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4518] - load-on-startup is not working with jsp page.

2001-10-30 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4518. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4362] - Reading init-params from a JSP should not need a servlet-mapping

2001-10-30 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4362. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4362] - Reading init-params from a JSP should not need a servlet-mapping

2001-10-30 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4362. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4534] - error-page not being processed

2001-10-30 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4534. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/webapp/java WarpConnector.java

2001-10-30 Thread jfclere
jfclere 01/10/31 00:10:29 Modified:jk/java/org/apache/ajp/tomcat4 Ajp13Connector.java webapp/java WarpConnector.java Log: Rechange net.ServerSocketFactory to ServerSocketFactory. Otherwise the connectors are not building against TC 4.0.1 Revision Changes

Re: [PATCH] allow mod_webapp to build against tomcat v 4.0.1

2001-10-30 Thread jean-frederic clere
Pier Fumagalli wrote: Remy Maucherat at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Use net.ServerSocketFactory instead of ServerSocketFactory. Index: java/WarpConnector.java === RCS file:

Re: [Q+Patch] Error page behaviour in TC 3.x and 4.0.1

2001-10-30 Thread Andreas Junghans
Hi there, Craig wrote: Using an include() instead would have other negative consequences -- for example, you would not be able to set HTTP headers in the error page, due to the normal restrictions on includes. These are guaranteed to come as a nasty surprise to users who don't know what