Pier Fumagalli wrote:
>
> Remy Maucherat at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >> Use net.ServerSocketFactory instead of ServerSocketFactory.
> >>
> >> Index: java/WarpConnector.java
> >> ===================================================================
> >> RCS file:
> >> /home/cvspublic/jakarta-tomcat-connectors/webapp/java/WarpConnector.ja
> >> va,v
> >> retrieving revision 1.24
> >> diff -u -r1.24 WarpConnector.java
> >> --- java/WarpConnector.java 2001/10/22 21:44:21 1.24
> >> +++ java/WarpConnector.java 2001/10/30 22:47:04
> >> @@ -74,7 +74,7 @@
> >> import org.apache.catalina.Response;
> >> import org.apache.catalina.Service;
> >> import org.apache.catalina.net.DefaultServerSocketFactory;
> >> -import org.apache.catalina.ServerSocketFactory;
> >> +import org.apache.catalina.net.ServerSocketFactory;
> >> import org.apache.catalina.util.LifecycleSupport;
> >>
> >> public class WarpConnector implements Connector, Lifecycle, Runnable {
> >
> > Agreed. I think we should forget the deprecation warnings, and have
> > connectors which compile with both branches at the moment, as neither nod_jk
> > or mod_webapp can be considered "branchable" (ie, both have a few issues
> > which should be dealt with before).
>
> I would stick with 4.0 ATM, without branching off to write a 4.1
> implementation until 4.1's API is a little bit more clear... Also (from my
> personal point of view), being 4.0 much more tested than 4.1 (and used by
> users) that's our primary goal (all IMO)
Ok, I have committed the change... (that means arrange what I broke some days
ago!).
>
> Pier
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
