DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5986.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5988.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5988.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
One of the goals of the new native connector is to provide better
interfaces and support for different transports.
What I would like is to clarify ( and simplify ) the relation
between the 3 objects that are involved in the transport:
- worker
- endpoint
- channel
in order to have less
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5894.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5908.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
What I want is to make the C code implement the
same abstractions with the java side and to get JNI to use the
same transport abstraction.
What do you think ? Henri, JFC, Kevin - I hope for an quick answer :-)
it sounds like you're heading towards a good deal of symmetry between the
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5990.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4426.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5246.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5411.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5560.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Our iSeries are using now latest JDK 1.3.1
and the strange layout is still here :(
/QIBM/ProdData/Java400/jdk13
The patch is really needed ;)
-
Henri Gomez ___[_]
EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .)
PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo...
PGP
craigmcc02/01/23 15:06:54
Modified:webapps/admin/WEB-INF controls.tld struts-config.xml web.xml
webapps/admin/WEB-INF/classes/org/apache/webapp/admin
ApplicationResources_en.properties RowTag.java
SetUpTreeAction.java
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5993.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5994.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Ive just done a CVS update to pick up Remy's reorganization of the build
process (and added dependency on jakarta-tomcat-connectors). Trying to do
ant clean followed by ant fails on line 155 of the
jakarta-tomcat-connectors/webapp/build.xml file, with the compiler
claiming that class
costin 02/01/23 15:26:04
Modified:src/share/org/apache/tomcat/util IntrospectionUtils.java
Log:
Check for tools.jar existence and try java.home/lib/tools.jar too, for the
few vms using a 'strange' layout or setting java.home to JAVA_HOME.
Revision ChangesPath
1.16
Ive just done a CVS update to pick up Remy's reorganization of the build
process (and added dependency on jakarta-tomcat-connectors). Trying to do
ant clean followed by ant fails on line 155 of the
jakarta-tomcat-connectors/webapp/build.xml file, with the compiler
claiming that class
costin 02/01/23 15:28:49
Modified:src/share/org/apache/jasper/compiler SunJavaCompiler.java
Log:
A bit of cutpaste from ant, to better control javac.Main loading.
In some cases, even if we do have tools.jar in the thread loader or another
class loader, having Main
For the C side, I'm working on JNI worker as a channel - that
will resolve
some of the current problems in jni ( performance, i18n, etc) and will
make the jni channel available in 4.0 too. But we still have
to update the
other server connectors, decide what we want to do about
config, etc - so
What do you think ? Henri, JFC, Kevin - I hope for an quick
answer :-)
it sounds like you're heading towards a good deal of symmetry
between the
java and c code, which is definitely good :)
Yes, and you got my +1 also :)
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional
Bravo :)
-
Henri Gomez ___[_]
EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .)
PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo...
PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
I've got a little problems with all the jars that are
mandatory to build TC 4.0, javamail, jta, jdbc-ext, jmxri.
tyrex is allready packaged and JSSE is only optional.
Could someone, may be from Sun staff, could release all of
them in a single tarball and put it on the download area ?
For now
On Wed, 23 Jan 2002, Remy Maucherat wrote:
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2002 15:26:11 -0800
From: Remy Maucherat [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: HEAD Branch Build Problems
Ive just done a CVS update to
On Wed, 23 Jan 2002, Remy Maucherat wrote:
Did a fresh checkout of j-t-c. The file is still there, but this time it
worked ... wierd.
That's not normal, there shouldn't be a j-t-c/webapp/java/Constants.java at
all.
http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/jakarta-tomcat-connectors/webapp/java/
On Wed, 23 Jan 2002, GOMEZ Henri wrote:
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2002 23:26:37 +0100
From: GOMEZ Henri [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Tomcat 4.0.2-b2] Java binaries uploaded
I've got a little
costin 02/01/23 15:58:38
Modified:src/facade22/org/apache/tomcat/facade JspInterceptor.java
Log:
The last patch for the strange tools.jar problem.
We make sure tools.jar is added to the context loader, and pass it to jasper
( using the previous patch to make sure no
On Wed, Jan 23, 2002 at 02:28:52AM -0800, Remy Maucherat wrote:
On Tue, Jan 22, 2002 at 06:14:18PM -0800, Remy Maucherat wrote:
Do you mean you're spawning another process to do compilation? I
thought that javac's core class had been fixed so that it'd be possible
to run it in a thread
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5769.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5995.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5993.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
craigmcc02/01/23 18:13:53
Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina Tag: tomcat_40_branch
Globals.java
Log:
Fix a leading slash that was apparently accidentally deleted.
Revision ChangesPath
No revision
No
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5998.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
That's why jtc tag 4.0.2 b2 didn't build when you only have
jakarta-tomcat-4.0.2-b2.
Question :
- Should we retag jtc 4.0.2-b2 including these patches or
should I patch my tarball for jtc tagged 4.0.2-b2 to compile
jtc with just TC 4.0.2-B2 on path ?
Regards
BTW: Did the jtc tagged
total_read = readN(in, b, H_SIZE, len);
-
-if (total_read = 0) {
+
+// it's ok to have read 0 bytes when len=0 -- this means
+// the end of the stream has been reached.
+if (total_read 0) {
total_read = readN(in, b, H_SIZE, len);
-
-if (total_read = 0) {
+
+// it's ok to have read 0 bytes when len=0 -- this means
+// the end of the stream has been reached.
+if (total_read 0) {
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6000.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5684.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6000.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
FYI for the 4.x group mostly. He is refering to bug #5390, which it seems
is still alive in 4.x.
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2002 10:48 PM
Subject: Re: Possible Explanation - Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 5684] -
WEB-INF/lib jar
41 matches
Mail list logo
