Michael Smith wrote:
Remy Maucherat wrote:
I was wondering about how expensive the Thread.setPriority method is,
and to which extent it does what it advetises.
The extent to which it has an effect is very much platform (and
probably JVM) dependent. It's also dependent on the permissions a
Hi,
Whether it's a bug or not, it's definitely a strange thing going on, and at
this point in time I suspect the mod_jk.so is the problem. I hope I can get
a little verification.
I have a Location Apache directive inside a SSL-enabled virtualhost, and
if I go to a *directory* under that location
hgomez 2002/12/17 01:44:35
Modified:jk/native/apache-2.0 bldjk.qclsrc
Log:
Updated iSeries build file, include the missing _REENTRANT define
Revision ChangesPath
1.6 +266 -285 jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native/apache-2.0/bldjk.qclsrc
Index: bldjk.qclsrc
hgomez 2002/12/17 02:15:54
Modified:jk/native/common jk_version.h
Log:
Set JK to release 1.2.2
Revision ChangesPath
1.8 +2 -2 jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native/common/jk_version.h
Index: jk_version.h
jtc cvs tagged JK_1_2_2
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
hgomez 2002/12/17 02:36:16
Modified:jk/native/common jk_version.h
Log:
Set JK to 1.2.3-dev
Revision ChangesPath
1.9 +3 -3 jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native/common/jk_version.h
Index: jk_version.h
As a Tomcat user I have been looking forward to getting
Tomcat 4.1.x into my production environment. Up until
now I have had issues that have prevented me upgrading.
I'm a regular reader of this list but my only previous
participation has been when voting a previous milestone
of 4.1.x not
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15436.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15437.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
JK 1.2.2 maintenance release is available at :
http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/release/v1.2.2/
Changes with JK 1.2.2:
* tomcat_trend.pl updated script to support changed logging of
aborted requests
* jk set correctly the content-type in Apache 2.0,
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15437.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15436.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
remm2002/12/17 05:26:04
Modified:docs bugreport.html building.html index.html irc.html
news.html resources.html
xdocsbuilding.xml index.xml resources.xml
Log:
- Website update for Tomcat 4.1.17.
Revision ChangesPath
1.8
Remy Maucherat wrote:
ballot
[ ] Alpha
[ ] Beta
[X] Stable (General Availability)
Reason (optional):
/ballot
Thanks for voting and for testing 4.1.17 Alpha!
It is time for a stable release.
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail:
+1 Welcome aboard Filip
Remy Maucherat wrote:
I'd like to nominate Filip Hanik filip at filip.net as a committer on
the Tomcat project. Filip has written the clustering code that was
committed recently in the Tomcat 5 CVS, and is willing to maintain it,
as well as continuing to improve it
Glenn Nielsen wrote:
+1 Welcome aboard Filip
A little bit late, as Filip already got his account ;-)
Welcome on board Filip :)
Remy
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Is there a reported bug you are trying to address?
I have not noticed any problems related to thread scheduling with the medium
volume site I administer.
It is possible that this change could cause threads other than the socket
accept thread to be starved. I would be -1 for making this change
Glenn Nielsen wrote:
Is there a reported bug you are trying to address?
Not really. The test here reported a lot of connection failures:
http://webperformanceinc.com/library/ServletReport/
Tomcat 4.1.17 should improve the results over 4.1.12 (it's faster and
would probably lower slightly
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Glenn Nielsen wrote:
+1 Welcome aboard Filip
A little bit late, as Filip already got his account ;-)
Welcome on board Filip :)
Did there is any chance to have one day javagroups as an
jakarta project covered by an ASF license ?
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
I spent some times playing with http compression,
using Apache 2.0 mod_deflate together with mod_jk,
and it works great (at least with jk 1.2.2).
I wonder now if someone, may be Remy, has plan to
add it in Catalina 1.x/2.x (or Coyote) to make it
available for both HTTP 1.1 and JK2 ?
For those
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15442.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Henri Gomez wrote:
I spent some times playing with http compression,
using Apache 2.0 mod_deflate together with mod_jk,
and it works great (at least with jk 1.2.2).
I wonder now if someone, may be Remy, has plan to
add it in Catalina 1.x/2.x (or Coyote) to make it
available for both HTTP 1.1 and
hi,
i'm using tomcat 4.1.12
i created a connector on port 8009 and IP 127.0.0.1.
the server.xml file is correct - which means that the address-attribute
is set to 127.0.0.1.
the administrator shows the correct address 127.0.0.1 and i would
expect tomcat to bind to 127.0.0.1:8009, but it binds
My 2 cents. I rather a server deny connections and keep on running than accept
connections until it dies :)
peter lin
Remy Maucherat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:Glenn Nielsen wrote:
Is there a reported bug you are trying to address?
Not really. The test here reported a lot of connection
Yes, that sums up my thoughts exactly.
Peter Lin wrote:
My 2 cents. I rather a server deny connections and keep on running than accept connections until it dies :)
peter lin
Remy Maucherat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:Glenn Nielsen wrote:
Is there a reported bug you are trying to address?
I knew that, just wanted to show my support. I am interested in the results
of the new clustering, at some point I want to setup clustering for one of my
customers.
Regards,
Glenn
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Glenn Nielsen wrote:
+1 Welcome aboard Filip
A little bit late, as Filip already got
Is this a bug? (i think so!)
sorry - i will use bugzilla next time.
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Henri Gomez wrote:
I spent some times playing with http compression,
using Apache 2.0 mod_deflate together with mod_jk,
and it works great (at least with jk 1.2.2).
I wonder now if someone, may be Remy, has plan to
add it in Catalina 1.x/2.x (or Coyote) to make it
For JK 2, I think it's fair to say that you should rely on the native
webserver capabilities (that's the whole point, I think). Great that you
added the support (I thought it had been there from the start, actually).
I didn't added support really, just corrected the way we set the
content-type
Henri Gomez wrote:
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Henri Gomez wrote:
I spent some times playing with http compression,
using Apache 2.0 mod_deflate together with mod_jk,
and it works great (at least with jk 1.2.2).
I wonder now if someone, may be Remy, has plan to
add it in Catalina 1.x/2.x (or
remm2002/12/17 08:40:24
Modified:docs bugreport.html building.html index.html irc.html
news.html resources.html
xdocs/stylesheets project.xml
Log:
- Update source and binaries links.
Revision ChangesPath
1.9 +2 -2
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15417.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
I was planning to add the feature as filters in Coyote HTTP/1.1, but
never did, because I wasn't able to find efficient compression code.
I suppose something could be put together using the JDK compression
IS and OS in the meantime.
GZIPOutputstream is quit fast today.
I think I'll
Henri Gomez wrote:
I was planning to add the feature as filters in Coyote
HTTP/1.1, but never did, because I wasn't able to find
efficient compression code. I suppose something could be put
together using the JDK compression IS and OS in the
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15446.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
-Original Message-
From: Henri Gomez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 6:27 AM
To: Tomcat Developers List
Subject: Re: [VOTE] New committer: Filip Hanik
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Glenn Nielsen wrote:
+1 Welcome aboard Filip
A little bit late, as Filip already
here is a good link about the different VM settings for the GC.
should be worth trying out the different ones to see which one is best for
Tomcat
http://wireless.java.sun.com/midp/articles/garbagecollection2/
Filip
~
Namaste - I bow to the divine in you
~
Filip Hanik
Software Architect
I knew that, just wanted to show my support. I am interested in
the results
of the new clustering, at some point I want to setup clustering
for one of my
customers.
Regards,
Glenn
thanks Glenn,
the version for Tomcat 4.1.12 is fully working
http://sourceforge.net/projects/tomcat-jg and I am
jfarcand2002/12/17 11:21:07
Modified:jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/servlet JspServlet.java
Log:
Remove the first condition since it is not required. The getPathInfo() returns
always null except when the jsp-property-file element is used and the servlet-name
is not defined in
jfarcand2002/12/17 12:05:07
Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina Globals.java
Log:
Servlet 2.4 Specification addition
--
SRV.8.4.2 Forwarded Request Parameters
Except for servlets obtained by using the getNamedDispatcher method,
jfarcand2002/12/17 12:06:20
Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/core
ApplicationRequest.java ApplicationDispatcher.java
ApplicationHttpRequest.java
Log:
Servlet 2.4 Specification addition
jfarcand2002/12/17 12:06:51
Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/servlets
DefaultServlet.java InvokerServlet.java
Log:
Servlet 2.4 Specification addition
--
SRV.8.4.2 Forwarded Request Parameters
Except
jfarcand2002/12/17 12:07:38
Modified:coyote/src/java/org/apache/coyote/tomcat5 CoyoteRequest.java
Log:
Servlet 2.4 Specification addition
--
SRV.8.4.2 Forwarded Request Parameters
Except for servlets obtained by using the getNamedDispatcher
I am toying around with the connector for some personal reasons, nothing I
intend to commit.
I have a question,
I added an attribute to the Connector element in server.xml.
My problem is that the setAttributeXXX(String x) is only invoked once but
three instances of the CoyoteConnector are
oops idiot question,
sorry about that! I need to set the attribute in every Connector element
Filip
~
Namaste - I bow to the divine in you
~
Filip Hanik
Software Architect
www.filip.net
-Original Message-
From: Filip Hanik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002
Hi,
One .jsp file has @page import statements, that class is under WEB-INF/classes and
compiler could not find it. It works in develop machine but not on production machine
which tomcat version is 3.2.3 and develop is 3.2.4. The configuration of both machine
are same. The compile error looks
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15456.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15462.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
kinman 2002/12/17 14:16:56
Modified:jsr152/examples/xml xml.jsp xml.txt
Log:
- Modified to work to namespace-aware XML parser.
Revision ChangesPath
1.2 +1 -1 jakarta-servletapi-5/jsr152/examples/xml/xml.jsp
Index: xml.jsp
kinman 2002/12/17 14:23:23
Modified:jsr152/examples/WEB-INF web.xml
jsr154/examples/WEB-INF web.xml
Log:
- Patch by Glenn Nielsen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Adds display name and descriptions to their web.xml files, so that the
HTML manager app has a name to display
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15463.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15464.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
We use to show login page via HTTPS and then redirect to HTTP. It worked fine with
tomcat 3.x + Apache with ssl. Can't make it work with 4.1.17 and Apache with ssl -
when I change protocol it creates new session and as a result forces me to login
again. Is it expected behavior?
--
To
Attached are a set of API patches leading up to PFD2 of the
specification. Look for a corresponding patch to jakarta-tomcat-jasper
to bring it up to date with these APIs.
Also note the attached replacement for TagProtocol.gif.
Attached is a patch to bring Japser2 up to date with the latest APIs
from the JSR-152 Expert Group.
jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/runtime/JspContextWrapper.java
- Updated to conform to new VariableResolver API
jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/runtime/PageContextImpl.java
-
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15470.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15470.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
The Tomcat Team announces the immediate availability of Apache Tomcat
4.1.17 Stable.
Tomcat 4.1.17 includes many bugfixes and performance tweaks over Tomcat
4.1.12. Please see the release notes for a complete list of the changes.
Downloads (source and binaries):
I upgraded my site to use Tomcat 4.1.17 tonight. While this fixed all
my previous ClassNotFound errors for the hsql jdbc driver (in Tomcat
4.0.6), I started getting a new error:
17-Dec-2002 10:02:52 PM org.apache.jk.common.ChannelSocket
processConnection
INFO: server has been restarted or reset
Matt Raible wrote:
I upgraded my site to use Tomcat 4.1.17 tonight. While this fixed all
my previous ClassNotFound errors for the hsql jdbc driver (in Tomcat
4.0.6), I started getting a new error:
17-Dec-2002 10:02:52 PM org.apache.jk.common.ChannelSocket
processConnection
INFO: server
Thanks for the link Filip. It is specific to JVM 1.4.1, but has
alot of good information. The problem is that there is no one good set
of jvm args to tune memory and GC, it really depends on so many things.
Hardware, OS, memory, applications, etc. But there are some general rules
that can be
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15474.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15470.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15464.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15475.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
65 matches
Mail list logo
