DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24085] New: - [Administration] The group and role list disappear! When "Create New User", "save" directly without filling in form.

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: New to dev list

On Thu, 2003-10-23 at 11:37, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Thanks, Bob. The presentation is good. Does Tomcat have design document? So I can > dig deeper to source code level. I don't believe that it does. This does seem to be a deficiency. The phrase "Use the Source Luke", springs to mind... Yo

[Patch] BaseDirContextTestCase depcrecated junit methods

Since assert is a reserved keyword, and is now part of the language, junit moved away from using it for test assertions, opting instead for things like assertTrue or assertEquals Here is the patch for BaseDirContextTestCase, to bring it up to par with junit's and Java's recommended practices. Jef

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24075] New: - mod_jk will not resolve hostnames

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: http://www.apache.org/dist/jakarta/tomcat-4/source/

Remy has been packaging Jasper in the j-t-4.1.x-src tarball (as "jasper"). - Original Message - From: "jean-frederic clere" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2003 8:52 AM Subject: http://www.apache.org/dist/jakarta/tomcat-4/source/ > Hi, > > I am "pl

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24073] New: - hang/deadlock, possibly in FileLogger

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: no main in Embedded.java

Forgive me if I am sounding like a complete idiot. But are you saying that I should use the JMX API in order to launch tomcat? After looking at some of the MX4J example code, this is the case. But I am not sure what class I should call from the JMX code in order to get Tomcat to start. I wi

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-5 build.properties.default

remm2003/10/23 10:33:32 Modified:.build.properties.default Log: - Upgrade to new DBCP and pool. Revision ChangesPath 1.110 +9 -9 jakarta-tomcat-5/build.properties.default Index: build.properties.default =

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-catalina/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/authenticator AuthenticatorBase.java

remm2003/10/23 10:33:10 Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/authenticator AuthenticatorBase.java Log: - Add the caching flags even over a secure connection, due to Mozilla bugs. - I'm willing to revert that. I think Bill originally added the

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23970] - form-based authentication and SSL, general principles

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: no main in Embedded.java

Mark W. Webb wrote: My main motivation for this is that I am looking for a way to start embedded Tomcat from within a C program using the Invocation API. What would be the new entry point class that I should look? Whatever this class is, its the one that I want to call from my C program. That

Re: no main in Embedded.java

My main motivation for this is that I am looking for a way to start embedded Tomcat from within a C program using the Invocation API. What would be the new entry point class that I should look? Whatever this class is, its the one that I want to call from my C program. Thank you. Jean-Franc

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24065] New: - setLocale() still overrides charset from setContentType().

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: http://www.apache.org/dist/jakarta/tomcat-4/source/

I have forgotten to tell that it is for Tomcat 4.1.x... Clere, Jean-Frederic wrote: Hi, I am "playing" building binaries of Tomcat: In http://www.apache.org/dist/jakarta/tomcat-4/source/ we only have jakarta-tomcat and jakarta-tomcat-connectors. I think we should add jakarta-tomcat-jasper/jasper

http://www.apache.org/dist/jakarta/tomcat-4/source/

Hi, I am "playing" building binaries of Tomcat: In http://www.apache.org/dist/jakarta/tomcat-4/source/ we only have jakarta-tomcat and jakarta-tomcat-connectors. I think we should add jakarta-tomcat-jasper/jasper2 and jakarta-servletapi-4 otherwise it is quite hard to rebuild a binary from the s

Re: Re: new to dev list

Thanks, Bob. The presentation is good. Does Tomcat have design document? So I can dig deeper to source code level. > > From: Bob Herrmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: 2003/10/23 Thu AM 01:18:12 EDT > To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: new to dev list > > Jamesmyang3 wr

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/procrun tomcat.dsp (KMM883223C0KM)

Dear Jean-Francois Arcand, Please remove from this alias. Sincerely, Lexia Sumsion Sun Customer Service Specialist Original Message Follows: - mturk 2003/10/23 07:01:42 Modified:procrun tomcat.dsp Log: Fix the missing POCRUN_EXTENDED preprocesor

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-4.0 build.properties.sample build.xml

jfclere 2003/10/23 08:32:10 Modified:.build.properties.sample build.xml Log: Arrange some minor problems with ant download task. Revision ChangesPath 1.70 +6 -6 jakarta-tomcat-4.0/build.properties.sample Index: build.properties.sample

Re: no main in Embedded.java

Remy Maucherat wrote: Jean-Francois Arcand wrote: The Embedded.main has been removed a long time ago (at the time of introducing JMX). As for the sh/bat, I did remove the option2 days ago (just browse the list). The JMX approach is in my opinion a good alternative: http://apache.crihan.

Re: no main in Embedded.java

Thanks for the information. I downloaded the tomcat-embedded tarball that you referenced. It looks very minimal, which is nice. Just a couple of points that I hope you can answer, my customer has some rigid requirements that I must follow: 1. The tomcat that I provide to the customer must be

Re: no main in Embedded.java

Jean-Francois Arcand wrote: The Embedded.main has been removed a long time ago (at the time of introducing JMX). As for the sh/bat, I did remove the option2 days ago (just browse the list). The JMX approach is in my opinion a good alternative: http://apache.crihan.fr/dist/jakarta/tomcat-5/

Re: no main in Embedded.java

The Embedded.main has been removed a long time ago (at the time of introducing JMX). As for the sh/bat, I did remove the option2 days ago (just browse the list). The JMX approach is in my opinion a good alternative: http://apache.crihan.fr/dist/jakarta/tomcat-5/v5.0.12-beta/bin/jakarta-tomc

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/procrun tomcat.rc

mturk 2003/10/23 07:05:11 Modified:procrun tomcat.rc Log: Add only the icon for the console mode. This also makes the binary about 10K smaller. Revision ChangesPath 1.3 +2 -2 jakarta-tomcat-connectors/procrun/tomcat.rc Index: tomcat.rc =

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/procrun/bin tomcat.exe tomcatw.exe

mturk 2003/10/23 07:02:52 Modified:procrun/bin tomcat.exe tomcatw.exe Log: Latest builds... BTW what was the conclusion for the location of those binaries? Revision ChangesPath 1.5 +28 -72jakarta-tomcat-connectors/procrun/bin/tomcat.exe <>

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/procrun tomcat.dsp

mturk 2003/10/23 07:01:42 Modified:procrun tomcat.dsp Log: Fix the missing POCRUN_EXTENDED preprocesor define to include TC specifics for the procrun. Revision ChangesPath 1.2 +7 -5 jakarta-tomcat-connectors/procrun/tomcat.dsp Index: tomcat.dsp

no main in Embedded.java

I was looking at the tomcat 5.0.12 source and noticed that the file Embedded.java does not contain a main. I think that there should be one, since catalina.sh references this class as the entry point to start tomcat. PS. I do alot of work with embedded java and would like to help out more.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24011] - 5.0.13 Installer creates wrong service Registry key

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24011] - 5.0.13 Installer creates wrong service Registry key

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24011] - 5.0.13 Installer creates wrong service Registry key

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-4.0 build.properties.sample build.xml

jfclere 2003/10/23 05:20:09 Modified:.build.properties.sample build.xml Log: Use archive and arrange some location. Use the Alpha of daemon instead cvs. Revision ChangesPath 1.69 +18 -14jakarta-tomcat-4.0/build.properties.sample Index: build.proper

error starting tomcat ....

hi i have downloaded tomcat 5.0.12 from jakarta website . having win 2000 as operating system and java2 sdk 1.4.0 ... now i have follewed all the instructions find on the online tutorial of configuring ans starting tomcat . but when i run catalina i found errors of : java.lang.reflect.Inv

Re: new to dev list

Jamesmyang3 writes: > I am new to this development list. I download tomcat source > code and try to compile and run it. Can anyone provide me > some information on how Tomcat is designed? The best I could ever find is a PDF of a presentation that Craig McClanahan made back in June of 2000. Look

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24011] - 5.0.13 Installer creates wrong service Registry key

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24050] - Logs folder not present in 5.0.12 tgz

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24050] New: - Logs folder not present in 5.0.12 tgz

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: New builds ?

David Rees wrote: Remy Maucherat wrote: David Rees wrote: I've been using 4.1.29 for development without any issues for a few days now. Just one minor annoyance, I get this message twice when starting Tomcat up: "CoyoteConnector Coyote can't register jmx for protocol" Very good point. I'll t

Logs folder not present in 5.0.12 (Was: Re: New builds ?)

Remy: I downloaded 5.0.12 yesterday and tried it on Linux. I got the following error touch: creating `/root/jakarta-tomcat-5.0.12/logs/catalina.out': No such file or directory /root/jakarta-tomcat-5.0.12/bin/catalina.sh: line 231: /root/jakarta-tomcat-5.0.12/logs/catalina.out: No such file or dir

Re: New builds ?

Remy Maucherat wrote: David Rees wrote: I've been using 4.1.29 for development without any issues for a few days now. Just one minor annoyance, I get this message twice when starting Tomcat up: "CoyoteConnector Coyote can't register jmx for protocol" Very good point. I'll tag new 4.1.30 and 5.0.

Re: New builds ?

David Rees wrote: Remy Maucherat wrote: So, what do we do with 4.1.28 ? AFAIK, no significant issue has been found with this build, with minor tweaks being made since then in the connectors. Is a 4.1.29 needed, or is it simply people forgot about that build ? Comments ? I've been using 4.1.2

Re: New builds ?

Remy Maucherat wrote: So, what do we do with 4.1.28 ? AFAIK, no significant issue has been found with this build, with minor tweaks being made since then in the connectors. Is a 4.1.29 needed, or is it simply people forgot about that build ? Comments ? I've been using 4.1.29 for development with