Re: Jk2 object model

2004-01-08 Thread Henri Gomez
I'm pretty busy these days so I can't works on JK2 as I want to. Some ideas/reflexions. JK2 is very similar to JK, from the tomcat point of vue, since the same ajp13 protocol is used, and may be in such case we could see JK2 too similar to JK to see users switch to JK2 (for instance we're still

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 25977] New: - commons-dbcp-1.1.jar not working properly with Oracle JDBC +XSU

2004-01-08 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25977. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 25977] - Commons DBCP not working properly with Oracle JDBC +XSU

2004-01-08 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25977. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-catalina/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/mbeans MBeanFactory.java

2004-01-08 Thread Remy Maucherat
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: amyroh 2004/01/07 21:32:25 Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/core StandardHost.java catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/mbeans MBeanFactory.java Log: Fix bugzilla 25878 - Add

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 25878] - Host created with Admin Application only ready, after complete tomcat restart

2004-01-08 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25878. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 25948] - FIX: Manager App can't redeploy ROOT applications

2004-01-08 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25948. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 25948] - FIX: Manager App can't redeploy ROOT applications

2004-01-08 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25948. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 25948] - FIX: Manager App can't redeploy ROOT applications

2004-01-08 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25948. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/util/java/org/apache/tomcat/util/http/mapper Mapper.java

2004-01-08 Thread remm
remm2004/01/08 03:11:33 Modified:util/java/org/apache/tomcat/util/http/mapper Mapper.java Log: - Cosmetic changes. - Remove useless check for null. - Use static on the inner classes. Revision ChangesPath 1.33 +6 -8

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 25127] - Tomcat 4.1.29 will not start with IBM JDK 1.3.0

2004-01-08 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25127. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-catalina/webapps/manager/WEB-INF/classes/org/apache/catalina/manager ManagerServlet.java

2004-01-08 Thread remm
remm2004/01/08 03:09:03 Modified:webapps/manager/WEB-INF/classes/org/apache/catalina/manager ManagerServlet.java Log: - Undeploy should be called with the displayed path to be able to work on the root context. - Bug 25948. - Submitted by Peter

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 25948] - FIX: Manager App can't redeploy ROOT applications

2004-01-08 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25948. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

RE: Jk2 object model

2004-01-08 Thread Mladen Turk
Hi, Since I've started few months ago all the C++ fuzziness (I did posted even some source to Costin back then), my intention wasn't to CPP-ize the existing code, but rather to move that 'dead' code on some new tracks. What I'm looking since then is some kind of different approach to the

Re: Jk2 object model

2004-01-08 Thread Henri Gomez
Mladen Turk a crit : Hi, Since I've started few months ago all the C++ fuzziness (I did posted even some source to Costin back then), my intention wasn't to CPP-ize the existing code, but rather to move that 'dead' code on some new tracks. What I'm looking since then is some kind of different

RE: Jk2 object model

2004-01-08 Thread Mladen Turk
-Original Message- From: Henri Gomez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] I agree with you that this would be JK3, rather then JK2 on steroids :-), and it would require a different perspective. I'm in favor of _usability_ over performance in that new approach. JavaGroups or

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 25980] New: - Documentation relating to where jsp examples are needs update

2004-01-08 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25980. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 25981] New: - jsp security example does not work!

2004-01-08 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25981. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 25981] - jsp security example does not work!

2004-01-08 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25981. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

RE: Jk2 object model

2004-01-08 Thread Mladen Turk
Hate to quote myself, but... As I said, the performance isn't a priority here, but rather usability. I'm sure that TC guys will be open here, and we will see (perhaps even in 5.1) the 'open TC API', that could be directly used, or seamlessly integrated from the native side. I would

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/http11/src/java/org/apache/coyote/http11 Http11Processor.java

2004-01-08 Thread remm
remm2004/01/08 05:08:13 Modified:http11/src/java/org/apache/coyote/http11 Http11Processor.java Log: - Report an exception which occurred during a low level flush. Revision ChangesPath 1.93 +1 -0

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-catalina/catalina/src/share/org/apache/coyote/tomcat5 OutputBuffer.java

2004-01-08 Thread remm
remm2004/01/08 05:09:04 Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/coyote/tomcat5 OutputBuffer.java Log: - Throw a wrapped IOE when an exception occurs during a low level flush. Revision ChangesPath 1.7 +6 -0

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/coyote/src/java/org/apache/coyote/tomcat4 OutputBuffer.java

2004-01-08 Thread remm
remm2004/01/08 05:09:39 Modified:coyote/src/java/org/apache/coyote/tomcat4 OutputBuffer.java Log: - Port patch to 4.1.x. Revision ChangesPath 1.12 +6 -0 jakarta-tomcat-connectors/coyote/src/java/org/apache/coyote/tomcat4/OutputBuffer.java Index:

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4663] - Broken Pipe under some load

2004-01-08 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4663. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 25980] - Documentation relating to where jsp examples are needs update

2004-01-08 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25980. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/util/java/org/apache/tomcat/util/threads ThreadPool.java

2004-01-08 Thread remm
remm2004/01/08 05:56:36 Modified:util/java/org/apache/tomcat/util/threads ThreadPool.java Log: - Some suggestions that were sent by Dave Dice. Jean Fran├žois assured me he did test this, so since this looks harmless to me (and won't hurt performance either), I'm willing

please help me sir

2004-01-08 Thread Ronak Patel
respected sir, I have a problem in configuration of TOMCAT4.1.29 ... I am working on win98 jdk1.3.1_09 there is a problem while run JSP file .. syntax error message is desplay when I run startup.bat file so, please give your suggession ronak - Do you

RE: please help me sir

2004-01-08 Thread Mladen Turk
From: Ronak Patel respected sir, I have a problem in configuration of TOMCAT4.1.29 ... I am working on win98 jdk1.3.1_09 First of all I would suggest that you move to some NT-based platform, but only after resolving the cause of a problem. there is a problem while run JSP file

ServletRequest.setCharacterEncoding() and GET parameters

2004-01-08 Thread Martin Kuba
Hi, I have found recently that current TomCat 5 uses different encoding for POST and GET parameters. I was quite surprised, because all bugs opened for this issue are just closed as invalid without an explanation. But after a long searching I found the discussion about bug 23929 at

Re: ServletRequest.setCharacterEncoding() and GET parameters

2004-01-08 Thread Remy Maucherat
Martin Kuba wrote: Hi, I have found recently that current TomCat 5 uses different encoding for POST and GET parameters. I was quite surprised, because all bugs opened for this issue are just closed as invalid without an explanation. But after a long searching I found the discussion about bug

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-catalina/webapps/docs proxy-howto.xml

2004-01-08 Thread remm
remm2004/01/08 06:55:57 Modified:webapps/docs proxy-howto.xml Log: - No className is needed anymore. Revision ChangesPath 1.6 +3 -4 jakarta-tomcat-catalina/webapps/docs/proxy-howto.xml Index: proxy-howto.xml

Re: ServletRequest.setCharacterEncoding() and GET parameters

2004-01-08 Thread Martin Kuba
Remy Maucherat wrote: Using different encoding for GET and POST parameters by default is counter-intuitive and breaks the Principle of least astonishment. If it is kept that way, the same bug will be reported again and again. -1. The attribute, now that it actually exists, is well documented.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24545] - DataSourceRealm cannot see JNDI DataSource defined within a Context

2004-01-08 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24545. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 25981] - jsp security example does not work!

2004-01-08 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25981. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 25981] - jsp security example does not work!

2004-01-08 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25981. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: Jk2 object model

2004-01-08 Thread Costin Manolache
The major mistake in jk2 is the 2 in the name. It was an error to fork ( even if it was easier to code and move it ) instead of improving mod_jk and adding/fixing. In JNI mode and from configuration perspective - as well as ability to use non-tcp-socket communation - jk2 is way ahead. As code

RE: Jk2 object model

2004-01-08 Thread Mladen Turk
From: Costin Manolache So my suggestion ( deja vue ? ) is to use evolution :-). A change in the OO model ( if needed ) or fixing/improving the current one is not as big change as it seems - it's mostly in initialization code. How about 'revolution'? On the other hand how does the evolution

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-catalina/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/mbeans MBeanFactory.java

2004-01-08 Thread Amy Roh
Remy Maucherat wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: amyroh 2004/01/07 21:32:25 Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/core StandardHost.java catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/mbeans MBeanFactory.java Log: Fix

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-catalina/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/mbeans MBeanFactory.java

2004-01-08 Thread Remy Maucherat
Amy Roh wrote: Remy Maucherat wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: amyroh 2004/01/07 21:32:25 Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/core StandardHost.java catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/mbeans

Re: Exception in RealmBase

2004-01-08 Thread Amy Roh
Mark Woon wrote: Hi all, I'm reposting this in the hopes that someone will responsd. I have a custom Realm implementation that extends org.apache.catalina.realm.RealmBase. It used to work in 4.x, but in 5.0.16, I'm getting the following exception on startup: 21:17:29,719 ERROR RealmBase:1092 -

[kylev-jakarta@kylev.com: DataSourceRealm and Context defined JNDI Resource]

2004-01-08 Thread Kyle VanderBeek
I'm re-forwarding this message to the list for (hopefully) discussion. I sent this the first time as 5.0 was going final, so people where very busy. I get very regular personal questions about this topic as people cull the list archives and find me. Also, I think I've seen two more bugs on

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24308] - for charset=UTF8 request.getParameter(i1).getBytes() return non UTF8 bytes

2004-01-08 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24308. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

RE: Jk2 object model

2004-01-08 Thread Mike Anderson
I agree that the current connectors (jk and jk2) are fairly stable and done because they just work. The hardest part in using them is that there is a lot of duplicated setup between the Java/Tomcat side and the webserver configuration just to get things working. Then, when you add a new webapp

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/coyote/src/java/org/apache/coyote/tomcat4 CoyoteConnector.java

2004-01-08 Thread remm
remm2004/01/08 14:50:32 Modified:coyote/src/java/org/apache/coyote/tomcat4 CoyoteConnector.java Log: - For the TC 4.1 branch, use the same default as in TC 4.1.27. Revision ChangesPath 1.29 +5 -5

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24308] - for charset=UTF8 request.getParameter(i1).getBytes() return non UTF8 bytes

2004-01-08 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24308. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

JMX JRMP rmi registry port configuration

2004-01-08 Thread Kevin Pfarr
When JMX is enabled, in the jk2.properties file, and configured to use the MX4J JRMP interal adapter, a rmi registry is created and bound to the default port of 1099. If there is another application using that port and bind expection is thrown and the adaptor is never enabled. A configuration

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 10563] - Multiple compiles for multiple requests

2004-01-08 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10563. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 14077] - JSP class corruption when compiling page on SMP server

2004-01-08 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14077. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26006] New: - Friendlier error message for Illegal target of jump or branch

2004-01-08 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26006. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: JMX JRMP rmi registry port configuration

2004-01-08 Thread Kevin Pfarr
The option mx.jrmpPort is used for registering the JRMPAdaptor to the NamingService, by setting the PROVIDER_URL. When the NamingService is regeristered it creates the rmi registry whiCh defaults to 1099. The code below will show what I mean about setting the port on the rmi registry. The

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 11909] - The memory and resident memory size increases for the new connector

2004-01-08 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11909. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: Exception in RealmBase

2004-01-08 Thread Mark Woon
Amy Roh wrote: Mark Woon wrote: I've taken a look at the source, and as far as I can tell, it's because the container is null. What is responsible for providing the Realm the container it's in? Is there some new bit of configuration I need to do in Tomcat 5? I'm also surprised that

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-catalina/modules/cluster/src/share/org/apache/catalina/cluster/tcp ReplicationListener.java SimpleTcpCluster.java TcpReplicationThread.java

2004-01-08 Thread fhanik
fhanik 2004/01/08 18:50:54 Modified:modules/cluster/src/share/org/apache/catalina/cluster/mcast McastService.java modules/cluster/src/share/org/apache/catalina/cluster/tcp ReplicationListener.java SimpleTcpCluster.java

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-catalina/modules/cluster/src/share/org/apache/catalina/cluster/tcp ReplicationListener.java

2004-01-08 Thread fhanik
fhanik 2004/01/08 18:53:08 Modified:modules/cluster/src/share/org/apache/catalina/cluster/tcp ReplicationListener.java Log: removed println Revision ChangesPath 1.9 +4 -4

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26010] New: - context path in server.xml doesn't like _ (underscore) character.

2004-01-08 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26010. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: Jk2 object model

2004-01-08 Thread Costin Manolache
Mladen Turk wrote: From: Costin Manolache So my suggestion ( deja vue ? ) is to use evolution :-). A change in the OO model ( if needed ) or fixing/improving the current one is not as big change as it seems - it's mostly in initialization code. How about 'revolution'? On the other hand how does