Al Banard wrote:
mod_jk2.so is there but libjkjni.so isn't, which seems to be what its
complaining about.
You should have a libjkjni.so in the .libs directory of jk/build/jk2/apache2.
When copied in modules it should work.
From a previous email ...
make clean build makeOutput
- This
hgomez 2004/03/10 01:36:39
Modified:jk/xdocs/jk2 configwebcom.xml
Log:
Fix documentation, Thanks NormW
Revision ChangesPath
1.14 +2 -2 jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/xdocs/jk2/configwebcom.xml
Index: configwebcom.xml
This account does not exist
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
hgomez 2004/03/10 01:39:30
Modified:jk/native2/server/apache2 mod_jk2.c
Log:
Correct name, we should have mod_jk2 and not mod_jk :-)
Thanks Guenter
Revision ChangesPath
1.75 +19 -19jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native2/server/apache2/mod_jk2.c
Index:
NormW wrote:
Good morning All.
Please find attached a patch foe what I believe is the last erroneous
reference to lb:0.
It left here as an attachment and replicated it below.
Thanks,
Norm
---
jfclere 2004/03/10 01:47:34
Modified:jk/native2 Makefile.in
Log:
Do make before make install otherwise libtool says:
libtool: link: `strings/*.lo' is not a valid libtool object
Revision ChangesPath
1.6 +1 -0 jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native2/Makefile.in
hgomez 2004/03/10 04:13:31
Modified:jk/native/apache-2.0 mod_jk.c
Log:
Fix a problem with the latest iSeries Apache 2.0.47
Revision ChangesPath
1.94 +10 -2 jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native/apache-2.0/mod_jk.c
Index: mod_jk.c
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native/apache-2.0 mod_jk.c
+
#ifdef AS400
#include ap_charset.h
#include util_charset.h /* ap_hdrs_from_ascii */
@@ -50,10 +51,17 @@
#endif
Is it necessary to conditionally
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27167.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27167.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
I am using log4j in my WebApplication.
Where I must configurate path or classpath in Tomcat to locate
logXX.properties (properties file of log4j).
I put my propertie file in web-inf\classes but it does not works.
What I need to do ?
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27566.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Mladen Turk wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native/apache-2.0 mod_jk.c
+
#ifdef AS400
#include ap_charset.h
#include util_charset.h /* ap_hdrs_from_ascii */
@@ -50,10 +51,17 @@
#endif
Is it necessary to
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27566.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Who is the moderator of the Tomcat User mailing list? For several days,
I've been awaiting acceptance to the list, but have heard nothing.
Previously I was a member of the Tomcat User Digest list, but
unsubscribed to that list after deciding to subscribe to Tomcat User.
Thank you,
Derek
NOTICE:
Howdy, ;)
Who is the moderator of the Tomcat User mailing list? For several
days,
I've been awaiting acceptance to the list, but have heard nothing.
Previously I was a member of the Tomcat User Digest list, but
unsubscribed to that list after deciding to subscribe to Tomcat User.
I am, and I
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27572.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26978.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
-Original Message-
From: Guenter Knauf [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 09 March 2004 21:32
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: jk2 new shmem using APR
I believe there's a problem with the file rights, not with
SHM self. I think the
libjkjni is built when --with-jni is not specified at configure time.
When this happens it is not usable, so I'll be changing the build to
only build libjkjni when --with-jni is specified.
I overlooked one thing with the recent pcre changes I committed. The
functions ap_pregcomp and ap_regexec
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12183.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21217.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
This account does not exist
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24392.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
truk2004/03/10 11:07:41
Modified:jk/native2 configure.in
jk/native2/server/apache2 Makefile.in
jk/support jk_java.m4
Log:
Only build libjkjni.so when --with-jni is specified.
Revision ChangesPath
1.22 +3 -2
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27581.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27581.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Embarrassingly replying to myself
I misstated something before. The pcre change is not a problem for
inprocess mode, its a problem for jni out of process mode (i.e.
apr.NativeSo=libjkjni.so).
I think the most reasonable solution is to work as follows:
--with-pcre and no --with-jni, use
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27582.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14359.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hi Kurt,
thanks for going this way - I have no choice on NetWare since the PCRE functions are
not exported at all.
Guenter.
I misstated something before. The pcre change is not a problem for
inprocess mode, its a problem for jni out of process mode (i.e.
apr.NativeSo=libjkjni.so).
I think
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27584.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
markt 2004/03/10 13:16:32
Modified:jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/resources
messages.properties messages_es.properties
messages_fr.properties messages_ja.properties
Log:
- Fix 14359. Remove last traces of largefile option.
markt 2004/03/10 13:33:10
Modified:jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper Tag: tomcat_4_branch
EmbededServletOptions.java JspC.java Options.java
jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/resources Tag:
tomcat_4_branch
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14359.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
markt 2004/03/10 14:35:10
Modified:coyote build.xml
http11 build.xml
Log:
- Fix bug 17315. Version info not set correctly in manifest files.
Revision ChangesPath
1.27 +2 -2 jakarta-tomcat-connectors/coyote/build.xml
Index: build.xml
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17315.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17405.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27588.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hi Guenter,
Your welcome. ;-) Your email made me realize there no difference
between using the ap_pregcomp and ap_regexec functions and the regcomp
and regexec functions on platforms that use configure. So I can
simplify this a bit more and always use regcomp and regexec
when --with-pcre is
This account does not exist
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
truk2004/03/10 15:52:34
Modified:jk/native2/server/apache2 Makefile.apxs.in Makefile.in
Log:
Go back to using HAS_PCRE to fix libjkjni unresolved references.
This reverts Apache2 back to its original behavior for pcre
(for platforms that use configure). If you want pcre
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27590.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27588.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
is that true?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
luehe 2004/03/10 20:18:31
Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/session
StandardSession.java
Log:
Fixed regression re: Bugtraq 4839736
(HttpSession.setMaxInactiveInterval() doesn't behave as expected),
which had been originally fixed in
billbarker2004/03/10 21:01:20
Modified:xdocsindex.xml
docs index.html
Log:
Updating latest Tomcat 3 version to 3.3.2.
Revision ChangesPath
1.48 +2 -2 jakarta-tomcat-site/xdocs/index.xml
Index: index.xml
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
luehe 2004/03/10 20:18:31
Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/session
StandardSession.java
Log:
Fixed regression re: Bugtraq 4839736
(HttpSession.setMaxInactiveInterval() doesn't behave as expected),
which had been
Remy Maucherat wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
luehe 2004/03/10 20:18:31
Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/session
StandardSession.java
Log:
Fixed regression re: Bugtraq 4839736
(HttpSession.setMaxInactiveInterval() doesn't behave as
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For help
understanding the request please visit
http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project jakarta-tomcat-5 has an issue affecting it's community integration, and has
50 matches
Mail list logo
