My favourite page.
+++ Attachment: No Virus found
+++ Bitdefender AntiVirus - www.bitdefender.com
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bill Barker wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
luehe 2004/10/27 15:58:17
+
+private Method[] getAllDeclaredMethods(Class c) {
+
+if (c.equals(javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.class)) {
+return null;
+}
+
+Method[]
Protected message is available.
+++ Attachment: No Virus found
+++ Panda AntiVirus - www.pandasoftware.com
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
First part of the secure mail is available.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Based on all the recent traffic from people tying themselves into
pretzels with global resources, I have two concrete ideas. I would try
to concoct patches (at least for the first) if there was tentative
acceptance for either.
1) Configure the 'common' classpath in an editable location. By
i normally resolve this with symlinks. Means I can have 'my' common stuff like
database drivers
in any place I like. (ie in a versioned directory like
dbdrivers/database/version/jar
Kind regards
David Cassidy
I've been pondering something similar. (I just never got around to vocalizing
it) My preference is to introduce common/usr_lib (and server/usr_lib)(This
name is horrible, but you get the idea)
The usr_lib dirs would be in the same classloader as common/lib (or
server/lib) and would contain
Tim Funk wrote:
I've been pondering something similar. (I just never got around to
vocalizing it) My preference is to introduce common/usr_lib (and
server/usr_lib)(This name is horrible, but you get the idea)
The usr_lib dirs would be in the same classloader as common/lib (or
server/lib) and
Remy,
Can you send me a doc reference to the relevant properties? Maybe a howto is in order
here. If there's already a capability to append lib/class/endorsed dirs in a prop
file, then there's surely no reason to add some other place to configure the same
thing.
--benson
-Original
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31938.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
look at common.loader, server.loader and shared.loader in
catalina.properties. That's what we use for the described purpose.
Benson Margulies wrote:
Remy,
Can you send me a doc reference to the relevant properties? Maybe a howto is in order
here. If there's already a capability to append
Sure enough, just what the doctor ordered. Time to play tech writer again.
-Original Message-
From: Robert Krüger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 28, 2004 10:23 AM
To: Tomcat Developers List
Subject: Re: Two modest proposals about common\lib
look at common.loader,
Hi,
I agree with Remy. These proposed solutions are actually more problems. If it were
up to me there'd be two classloaders repositories: one for Tomcat (server/lib), and
one for each webapp (WEB-INF/lib). No shared, no common, no WEB-INF/classes. But
then again, it's not just up to me ;)
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31940.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31940.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31267.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
luehe 2004/10/28 09:42:37
Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/core
StandardWrapper.java
Log:
Prevent NPE when servlet class is not an instance of HttpServlet.
Return hardcoded set of methods in this case.
Revision ChangesPath
1.55
Bill,
Bill Barker wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
luehe 2004/10/27 15:58:17
+
+private Method[] getAllDeclaredMethods(Class c) {
+
+if (c.equals(javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.class)) {
+return null;
+}
+
+
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31914.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31945.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
- Original Message -
From: Jan Luehe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 28, 2004 9:45 AM
Subject: Re: cvs commit:
jakarta-tomcat-catalina/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/connector
CoyoteAdapter.java
Bill,
Bill Barker wrote:
Hi,
Would everyone be OK with cutting the 5.5.4 release tomorrow (Friday,
October 29th) instead of Saturday (October 30th) as we originally
agreed? It'd be more convenient for me, that's the only reason. If it
can't be done on Friday, it'll likely have to be Monday afternoon
instead, but
Actually, in the case of a JSP, we're dealing w/ JspServlet, which is an
instance of HttpServlet.
I've changed the code to return a constant set of methods if the servlet
is not an instance of HttpServlet, avoiding the NPE. :)
My bad. I should pay more attention to Jasper :).
However,
Yoav,
Just out of curiosity, what would you say to us poor JNI addicts?
--benson
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
fine by me.
Filip
-Original Message-
From: Shapira, Yoav [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 28, 2004 2:16 PM
To: Tomcat Developers List
Subject: Tomcat 5.5.4 tomorrow (Friday) instead of Saturday?
Hi,
Would everyone be OK with cutting the 5.5.4 release tomorrow (Friday,
yoavs 2004/10/28 12:33:45
jakarta-tomcat-catalina/catalina/src/bin/contrib - New directory
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
yoavs 2004/10/28 12:36:27
jakarta-tomcat-catalina/catalina/src/bin/contrib/openVMS-alpha - New directory
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
yoavs 2004/10/28 12:36:48
jakarta-tomcat-catalina/catalina/src/bin/contrib/GNU-Linux - New directory
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Possibilities:
1) the thing that explodes .war files in the webapp directory notices
META-INF/server.xml.
2) when an exploded directory is deposited into the webapp directory,
and it has a META-INF/server.xml, and there is no corresponding file in
conf/Catalina/host, the META-INF file is
Hi,
Like any other addiction, it's not good for you, and you should seek a
cure.
And like any other addiction, I don't mind it as long as it doesn't
impact me directly. But when I have to jump through all sorts of hoops
for someone else's addiction, then it impacts me directly, and that's
when
yoavs 2004/10/28 12:59:42
Modified:.Tag: TOMCAT_5_0 build.xml
webapps/docs Tag: TOMCAT_5_0 changelog.xml
Added: catalina/src/bin/contrib Tag: TOMCAT_5_0 README.txt
catalina/src/bin/contrib/GNU-Linux Tag: TOMCAT_5_0
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31447.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31499.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
I am adequately discouraged from trying to sell you additions to
facilitate JNI usage.
I trust that you are in no hurry to demolish common.
I could send along a convincing sob story as to why I really don't have
a practical alternative to JNI, but I doubt that anyone would find it
terribly
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31499.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hi,
OK, done in time for 5.0.30.
Yoav Shapira http://www.yoavshapira.com
-Original Message-
From: Leslie Kishalmi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 13, 2004 2:07 AM
To: Tomcat Developers List
Subject: Re: OS/2 Launchers in 5.0.29?
Thanks for your quick reply!
Let
yoavs 2004/10/28 13:30:53
Modified:webapps/docs Tag: TOMCAT_5_0 changelog.xml
class-loader-howto.xml developers.xml project.xml
proxy-howto.xml ssl-howto.xml status.xml
webapps/docs/config Tag: TOMCAT_5_0 engine.xml
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31945.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
yoavs 2004/10/28 13:44:35
Modified:webapps/docs Tag: TOMCAT_5_0 changelog.xml realm-howto.xml
webapps/docs/config Tag: TOMCAT_5_0 ajp.xml
Log:
Bugzilla 31739: minor doc patches.
Revision ChangesPath
No revision
No
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31739.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
yoavs 2004/10/28 13:54:49
Modified:webapps/docs changelog.xml realm-howto.xml
webapps/docs/config ajp.xml
Log:
Bugzilla 31739: minor doc updates.
Revision ChangesPath
1.157 +3 -0 jakarta-tomcat-catalina/webapps/docs/changelog.xml
Index:
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31739.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+
+attribute name=minProcessors required=false
+ strongdeprecated/strong
+ pThe minimum number of processors to start at initialization time.
+ If not specified, this atttribute is set to 5./p
+/attribute
+
+attribute name=maxProcessors
Shapira, Yoav wrote:
Hi,
Would everyone be OK with cutting the 5.5.4 release tomorrow (Friday,
October 29th) instead of Saturday (October 30th) as we originally
agreed? It'd be more convenient for me, that's the only reason. If it
can't be done on Friday, it'll likely have to be Monday afternoon
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31914.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
-- Virus Warning Message (on uusnwa0p)
Found virus WORM_NETSKY.Z in file Bill.txt
.exe (in Bill.zip)
The file is deleted.
I will be out of the office starting 21.10.2004 and will not return until
19.11.2004.
I will be on leave from 21 October to 12 November, and on mission from 15
to 19 November.
I will respond to your message when I return.
For any urgent matters, please contact Ms. Borque at 022 907 59 12.
Best
47 matches
Mail list logo
