hi

2004-04-13 Thread pierre . delisle
the information is wrong! - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [PROPOSAL] EL Transition to Jakarta Commons

2002-12-18 Thread Pierre Delisle
+1 -- Pierre Jan Luehe wrote: I'd like to resume discussion on a proposal circulated by James Strachan on March 13, 2002, about turning the implementation of JSTL's expression language (EL) into a reusable component and moving it from the Standard Taglib, an implementation of JSTL

Re: re-use of tag objects via Tag.release method

2001-03-01 Thread Pierre Delisle
Casey Lucas wrote: Looking at the rendered jsp - java files in the work directory (and noticing the calls to Tag.release), I realized that Jasper is not reusing tags that it creates. So, my question is: Has there been any conversations about implementing tag reuse in Jasper? To my

Re: re-use of tag objects via Tag.release method

2001-03-01 Thread Pierre Delisle
Casey Lucas wrote: Ok, I'll bite. Where's the best place to start looking? Code that does the rendering? Wasn't there at one point talk of making the renderer more "pluggable"? Great! Since you asked, here are some ideas: As a first step, I'd make sure to clearly understand all the spec

Re: Is it legal to have multiple taglib setter methods for the same property

2001-02-07 Thread Pierre Delisle
Alex, Until the expert group rules on this, one workaround (that will always work) is to simply do the following (assuming a property of type Object): instead of: mytags:foo bar="abc"/ use: mytags:foo bar='%="abc"%'/ Another way is to define a PropertyEditor associated

Re: [VOTE] New Committer: Kief Morris

2001-02-06 Thread Pierre Delisle
+1 -- Pierre -Original Message- From: Craig R. McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2001 12:16 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [VOTE] New Committer: Kief Morris Kief has recently proposed improvements to the session management code in

Re: [VOTE] Tomcat 3.3 Release Plan

2001-01-31 Thread Pierre Delisle
Tomcat 3.3 Release Plan Ballot: [ ] +1I am in favor of this plan and will help [X] +0I am in favor of this plan, but am unable to help [ ] -0I am not in favor of this plan [ ] -1I am against this plan being executed, and my reason is: --

Re: VOTE: New Commiter Shai Fultheim (was:RE: Tomcat session replicator)

2000-12-22 Thread Pierre Delisle
+1 for Shai Fultheim -- Pierre

Re: back port to 3.2 -- JspInterceptor

2000-12-22 Thread Pierre Delisle
Hi Costin, JspInterceptor is not "enabled" in 3.2 - it was one of the changes I wanted to spend more time into and make sure it's stable enough. It'll be used in 3.3 - or whatever will be called. Thanks for the clarification. However since it is being compiled in the build, it is "somewhat"

Re: back port to 3.2 -- JspInterceptor

2000-12-22 Thread Pierre Delisle
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: BTW, did you fixed the command line compiler ? JspInterceptor is based on the command line compiler, so if you fix the first it'll be very easy for me to fix the 3.3 interceptor. Sorry, my radar must have missed this one. If you can give me pointers/info,

Bug #55: Default for included files is 8859_1, with no option to set otherwise

2000-12-21 Thread Pierre Delisle
Trying to close a few Jasper bugs before the holiday break. I'd appreciate at least another pair of eyes to review what I believe should be done on that one... -- Pierre - Bug #55 - Synopsis: Default for included files is 8859_1, with no option to set otherwise. Report

Re: Bug #55: Default for included files is 8859_1, with no option to set otherwise

2000-12-21 Thread Pierre Delisle
Hans, What about the javac encoding? I believe it's currently hardcoded as "UTF8" (in Compiler at least). I'm not sure what it should be in case different included pages specify different charsets ... If you refer to bug report #269, I have a fix coming in the next few minutes. [testing it

Re: Bug #55: Default for included files is 8859_1, with no option to set otherwise

2000-12-21 Thread Pierre Delisle
Hans Bergsten wrote: ... So, the only possible remaining thing I can think of is to make sure the encoding specified by jspEncoding is also used as the "-encoding" argument to the javac command. It is. -- Pierre

back port to 3.2 -- JspInterceptor

2000-12-21 Thread Pierre Delisle
Tried to back port the last fix I made to Jasper in tomcat 4.0 to tomcat 3.2 (the fix related to bug report #269 -- java encoding). Was almost there until I realized there is a new class "JspInterceptor" in tomcat 3.2 that is impacted by that fix. Unfortunately, I'm not too knowledgeable about

Re: Bug #55: Default for included files is 8859_1, with no optionto set otherwise

2000-12-21 Thread Pierre Delisle
Maybe I'm not reading carefully enough (and I haven't had time to trace the code) but I don't understand what you mean in your "modifications". The correct behavior seems to me that when a file is included, a 'fake' JspReader should be created to scan the file for a @page directive with

Committers

2000-12-19 Thread Pierre Delisle
+1 for Vasile Gaburici +1 for Petr Jiricka +1 for Marc Saegesser -- Pierre

Re: Jasper Compiler -- when things go really wrong

2000-12-19 Thread Pierre Delisle
This seems right. I'll put the fix in tomorrow unless someone objects. [no need to send a patch]. -- Pierre "Bucknam, Brian" wrote: It's a long story, but I'm working on a project where Jasper 3.x is embedded inside a servlet, which can then be deployed to the container of our

Re: jsp - html speedup

2000-12-18 Thread Pierre Delisle
cga wrote: Hi there, I was thinking "There is a way to speed up jps". I mean if I take out white spaces and other unnecesary text out of the html part of a jsp, the server will send less bytes to the browser so it will be faster. I am pretending to do a Reader that takes out

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-4.0/jasper/src/share/org/apache/jasper/compiler BeanGenerator.java JspParseEventListener.java ParserXJspSaxHandler.java

2000-12-09 Thread Pierre Delisle
Hans Bergsten wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: pierred 00/12/09 21:56:44 Modified:jasper/src/share/org/apache/jasper Constants.java jasper/src/share/org/apache/jasper/compiler BeanGenerator.java JspParseEventListener.java

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-4.0/jasper/src/share/org/apache/jasper/compiler BeanGenerator.java JspParseEventListener.java ParserXJspSaxHandler.java

2000-12-09 Thread Pierre Delisle
Hans Bergsten wrote: Pierre Delisle wrote: Hans Bergsten wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: pierred 00/12/09 21:56:44 Modified:jasper/src/share/org/apache/jasper Constants.java jasper/src/share/org/apache/jasper/compiler

Re: Proposal: new commiter

2000-12-06 Thread Pierre Delisle
Please vote for Dan Milstein as a new commiter for tomcat. Great! +1 -- Pierre

Re: [PATCH REPOST] Tomcat 4.0 JSP Examples view Source

2000-11-30 Thread Pierre Delisle
Hans, I just tried the examples on tomcat 4.0, and the only problem I could see is with the source code of the "number guess" example. The link in num/numguess.html should be changed from "/examples/jsp/source.jsp?/jsp/num/numguess.jsp" to "numguess.txt" Otherwise, everything

Re: [VOTE] Tomcat 3.2 Final Release (!) and Ongoing Maintenance Plan

2000-11-28 Thread Pierre Delisle
The JSP spec is quite clear on the subject: "The only types of properties that can be assigned to from String constants and request parameter values are those listed in TABLE 2-4; the conversion applied is that shown in the table. Request-time expressions can be assigned to properties of any

Re: [VOTE] Tomcat 3.2 Final Release (!) and Ongoing Maintenance Plan

2000-11-28 Thread Pierre Delisle
(1) Build and release Tomcat 3.2 final on Wednesday 11/29/2000 +1 (2) Ongoing Support Plan for Tomcat 3.2 +1 (3) Release Manager for Tomcat 3.2.x Maintenance Releases +1 -- Pierre

Re: [PATCH] JspParseEventListener.java - Catch Throwable and throw new Exception

2000-11-26 Thread Pierre Delisle
Rob Saccoccio wrote: Would it be possible to change the generated _jspService() method to catch Throwable instead of Exception? JSP 1.2 is taking this direction (excerpt and patch below). Just committed the fix in tomcat-4.0 (since this is JSP1.2). +

Re: Patch for JikesJavaCompiler.java

2000-11-24 Thread Pierre Delisle
Christian, Thanks for the patch. I've just aplied it to tomcat-4.0. As for tomcat-3.2, I will be porting patches there *only* if this is approved by Craig (since we are so close to an official release of 3.2). -- Pierre "Schmitt, Christian" wrote: Hi all, we've been working with TC

Re: Proper jsp:setProperty behavior for Tomcat 3.2

2000-11-20 Thread Pierre Delisle
Larry Isaacs wrote: When applying Gareth Morgan's bug fix for JspRuntimeLibrary in the Tomcat MAIN branch, a difference between the tomcat_32 and MAIN versions revealed that Tomcat 3.2 still has the bug discovered by Glenn Nielsen. This is where: jsp:setProperty name="bean"

PageContext.removeAttribute

2000-11-20 Thread Pierre Delisle
Bug report #412 has just been filed. Synopsis: public void removeAttribute(String name) does not work properly Description: lt. spec from sun this method is required to remove the attribute from every scope. in class PageContextImpl however this only removes attributes from the page

Re: Proper jsp:setProperty behavior for Tomcat 3.2

2000-11-20 Thread Pierre Delisle
Larry Isaacs wrote: ... I'll try to commit a patch that fixes just the following: 1) Fix value="" without allowing param="..." to set. 2) For a String array property, make "?prop=prop=text" set the property for property="*". Currently property="*" handling assumes only simple

Re: Proper jsp:setProperty behavior for Tomcat 3.2

2000-11-17 Thread Pierre Delisle
Larry Isaacs wrote: I'm +1 on fixing the jsp:setProperty name="bean" property="prop" value=""/ bug in Tomcat 3.2. +1 If the desired behavior for indexed properties can be determined, I can try to fix that too. Sent email to Eduardo to try to get a clarification. -- Pierre

Re: FW: lock

2000-11-16 Thread Pierre Delisle
To: 'Pierre Delisle ' Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Sent: 11/15/00 9:55 PM Subject: RE: lock Hi Pierre, I saw the same thing a little after 5:00 PM when I tried a commit some changes to this directory. After about 5 minutes of this, I aborted and logged out of jakarta.apache.org. I have tried

Re: 3.2 status -- no taglibs in jars

2000-11-15 Thread Pierre Delisle
Brian Bucknam wrote: Craig says all the critical bugs are fixed, and it seems maybe they are. However, there is still a problem (see bug #215) in TagLibraryInfoImpl which makes it so that tag libraries cannot be packaged in .jar files. (3.2b7 (and 3.1) at least not on Windows, have not

Re: Tomcat 4.0 -- JSP XML representation problems

2000-11-14 Thread Pierre Delisle
Boyd, I cannot really use the XML representation, because the jsp:cdata tag doesn't work with current Tomcat-4.0-devel. I get classCastExceptions if I try to use this tag. But you could still use ![CDATA[ ... ]] for your CDATA. jsp:cdata should be in tomcat-4.0 befroe the end of the