: 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6
-Original Message-
From: GOMEZ Henri [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 10:12 AM
To: Tomcat Developers List
Subject: RE: JK versions
After reading the commit log - most changes related to jk_channel,
jk_registry
After reading the commit log - most changes related to jk_channel,
jk_registry, etc are pretty safe ( as they don't change any logic ).
We could actually release Jk1.2 using the main tree - if everyone is
comfortable with that. If not - Oct21 is probably a good point
to branch
( the release
I will not check anything else into mod_jk until this is decided (
since my next commit is pretty big and likely to brake things,
I did a lot of changes in uri_map, etc. - I need a stable
branch labeled before doing the commit ).
Ok, let's release mod_jk to 1.2 and start 2.0.
The refactoring is
| - And may be start to think about creating web pages
| for J-T-C
A small webpage with something like download mod_jk on it
would do the
trick for now! Anything is better than nothing! And a link to
it from the
Tomcat webpages would really be something!
It's IMPOSSIBLE to find things now.
I will not check anything else into mod_jk until this is decided (
since my next commit is pretty big and likely to brake things,
I did a lot of changes in uri_map, etc. - I need a stable
branch labeled before doing the commit ).
Ok, let's release mod_jk to 1.2 and start 2.0.
The
+1
GOMEZ Henri wrote:
I will not check anything else into mod_jk until this is decided (
since my next commit is pretty big and likely to brake things,
I did a lot of changes in uri_map, etc. - I need a stable
branch labeled before doing the commit ).
Ok, let's release mod_jk to 1.2 and
On Mon, 3 Dec 2001, GOMEZ Henri wrote:
Ok, let's release mod_jk to 1.2 and start 2.0.
What I did is put all the new stuff in native2. There are few other (big)
changes coming, I hope to get it back into a 'stable' state by the end of
the week and start updating the iis,nes,etc ( now I'm
On Mon, 3 Dec 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 3 Dec 2001, GOMEZ Henri wrote:
Ok, let's release mod_jk to 1.2 and start 2.0.
For 1.2 we have 2 choices:
- Branch it at Nov 15 ( or around ), i.e. before jk_channel and the new
stuff ( that will be part of jk2.0 ) was added.
After
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 12/03/01 01:53PM
On Mon, 3 Dec 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 3 Dec 2001, GOMEZ Henri wrote:
Ok, let's release mod_jk to 1.2 and start 2.0.
For 1.2 we have 2 choices:
- Branch it at Nov 15 ( or around ), i.e. before jk_channel and the
new
stuff ( that will be
On Mon, 3 Dec 2001, Mike Anderson wrote:
I'm afraid that we need to go back to an earlier date and re-port some
fixes.
The main reason is because the default 3.3 workers.properties still
reference ajp12 which the current codebase no longer supports. This
causes the plugins to fail during
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What I would like to do is make a branch for mod_jk 1.2, and eventually
build a snapshot.
If I'm getting this right, you are trying to preserve 1.2 for bug fixing
a backward compatibility, while focusing on 2.0. Yes?
If so, I'm [+1] for it as it seems very
There is an important issue to discuss - labeling mod_jk.
As you know, we are trying to make some improvements in jk, start using
APR, etc. That will involve few significant changes - and some people
may want to have a more 'stable' jk.
There are 4 versions of jk:
Let's call 1.0 what is
12 matches
Mail list logo
