Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Developers List tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org
Sent: Friday, July 29, 2005 3:30 PM
Subject: Re: Migration to Subversion
Yoav Shapira wrote:
Any and all comments appreciated. In particular:
a. Should more 3.x.x versions should be included in 4 5 above
Bill Barker wrote:
That is fine as long as you build and run on a 1.4+ JDK but when checking
for 1.3 compatibility the Coyote/HTTP connector fails. The root cause is
the use of the 1.4 regexp API in o.a.coyote.http11.Http11Processor
On 7/27/05, Mark Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All,
Following up on my offer to trial a Subversion migration using Watchdog, I
started to think that it would be a good idea to have an idea of what we want
our eventual Subversion layout to look like so we could target the Watchdog
Yoav Shapira wrote:
Any and all comments appreciated. In particular:
a. Should more 3.x.x versions should be included in 4 5 above?
b. I have assumed that all releases before 5.5.x will use the 5.0 branch
of the connectors. Is this assumption valid?
I don't think so. Some Tomcat 3.x
- Original Message -
From: Mark Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Developers List tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org
Sent: Friday, July 29, 2005 3:30 PM
Subject: Re: Migration to Subversion
Yoav Shapira wrote:
Any and all comments appreciated. In particular:
a. Should more 3.x.x
Hi,
Any and all comments appreciated. In particular:
a. Should more 3.x.x versions should be included in 4 5 above?
b. I have assumed that all releases before 5.5.x will use the 5.0 branch
of the connectors. Is this assumption valid?
I don't think so. Some Tomcat 3.x versions, for
