Re: URI Space and smarter hand off between Apache/Tomcat
--- Marc Slemko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 17 Jul 2003, P. Brewer wrote: > > > I found the following thread from a year ago: > > > > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=tomcat-dev&m=102815260317741&w=2\ > > . . . deleted . . . > > Was it shot down for a technical reason? Just didn't get > implmented? > > Or is implemented and not documented? I can help with C code, > but > > probably not much help with Java code. > > You would probably be better off to just make mod_jk* properly > support > Apache (and other webserver) configuration directives such as > Directory > and Files, then use them to control what gets passed on to tomcat. > > Having mod_jk trying to do parsing based on filenames on disk is a > very bad idea for performance and security reasons, especially on > win32 platforms. > I'm not sure where you are coming from, I am not suggesting pasing based on filenames on disk. I am speaking of resource names in the request URL. Granted in most cases there is a matching file name on disk, but that is irrelivant for this process. The matching occurs on the URI and the decision to pass to Tomcat is made with out ever looking at the disk. for example: JkMount /weatherPage/* JkNotMount /weatherPage/images/* JkNotMount /weatherPage/*.html would yeild the following results Request Handled By Server --- http://my.server/weatherPage/index.html apache http://my.server/weatherPage/textForcasttomcat http://my.server/weatherPage/images/sun.gif apache http://my.server/weatherPage/currentTemp.jpgtomcat http://my.server/weatherPage/images/cloud.jpg apache http://my.server/weatherPage/city/newyork.html apache http://my.server/weatherPage/city/current?city=newyork tomcat ps. Sorry for incomplete submission. __ Do you Yahoo!? SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month! http://sbc.yahoo.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: URI Space and smarter hand off between Apache/Tomcat
--- Marc Slemko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 17 Jul 2003, P. Brewer wrote: > > > I found the following thread from a year ago: > > > > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=tomcat-dev&m=102815260317741&w=2\ > > . . . deleted . . . > > Was it shot down for a technical reason? Just didn't get > implmented? > > Or is implemented and not documented? I can help with C code, > but > > probably not much help with Java code. > > You would probably be better off to just make mod_jk* properly > support > Apache (and other webserver) configuration directives such as > Directory > and Files, then use them to control what gets passed on to tomcat. > > Having mod_jk trying to do parsing based on filenames on disk is a > very bad idea for performance and security reasons, especially on > win32 platforms. > I'm not sure where you are coming from, I am not suggesting pasing based on filenames on disk. I am speaking of resource names in the request URL. Granted in most cases there is a matching file name on disk, but that is irrelivant for this process. The matching occurs on the URI and the decision to pass to Tomcat is made with out ever looking at the disk. for example: JkMount /weatherPage/* JkNotMount /weatherPage/images/* JkNotMount /weatherPage/*.html would yeild the following results Request Handled By Server --- http://my.server/weatherPage/index.html apache http://my.server/weatherPage/textForcast __ Do you Yahoo!? SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month! http://sbc.yahoo.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: URI Space and smarter hand off between Apache/Tomcat
On Thu, 17 Jul 2003, P. Brewer wrote: > I found the following thread from a year ago: > > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=tomcat-dev&m=102815260317741&w=2\ > > Basiclly discussing a JkNotMount for excluding images and other > static content from being passed to Tomcat. I can't tell that > anythin was done. > > Was it shot down for a technical reason? Just didn't get implmented? > Or is implemented and not documented? I can help with C code, but > probably not much help with Java code. You would probably be better off to just make mod_jk* properly support Apache (and other webserver) configuration directives such as Directory and Files, then use them to control what gets passed on to tomcat. Having mod_jk trying to do parsing based on filenames on disk is a very bad idea for performance and security reasons, especially on win32 platforms. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
URI Space and smarter hand off between Apache/Tomcat
I found the following thread from a year ago: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=tomcat-dev&m=102815260317741&w=2\ Basiclly discussing a JkNotMount for excluding images and other static content from being passed to Tomcat. I can't tell that anythin was done. Was it shot down for a technical reason? Just didn't get implmented? Or is implemented and not documented? I can help with C code, but probably not much help with Java code. __ Do you Yahoo!? SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month! http://sbc.yahoo.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
