On Fri, 20 Jul 2001, Jon Stevens wrote:
> on 7/19/01 10:58 PM, "Craig R. McClanahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I'm positive Jon will be +1 for this :-), but I'm very -1 for reasons that
> > have been discussed at length on this and other lists in the past.
> > Storing JAR files is evil,
On Fri, 20 Jul 2001, Jon Stevens wrote:
> The next logical step is to use Geir's JJAR (look in the
> jakarta-commons-sandbox) to automatically download the right .jar files for
> you.
>
> > Actually, Jon's suggestion is the right answer.
> >
> > Craig McClanahan
>
> I'm going to print that qu
on 7/20/01 1:29 AM, "GOMEZ Henri" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Why could still use symlink as I do in my RPM :)
>
> ln -s jakarta-regexp-1.2.jar jakarta-regexp.jar
Doesn't work on winblows.
-jon
on 7/19/01 10:58 PM, "Craig R. McClanahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm positive Jon will be +1 for this :-), but I'm very -1 for reasons that
> have been discussed at length on this and other lists in the past.
> Storing JAR files is evil, because it creates dependencies on those
> particula
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > >The problem you are having can be easily resolved by simply editing your
> > >local jakarta-turbine-4.0/build.properties or your
> > >${user.home}/build.properties
> >
> > Why could still use symlink as I do in my RPM :)
> >
> > ln -s jakarta-regexp-1.2.jar jakarta
On Fri, 20 Jul 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > >The problem you are having can be easily resolved by simply editing your
> > >local jakarta-turbine-4.0/build.properties or your
> > >${user.home}/build.properties
> >
> > Why could still use symlink as I do in my RPM :)
> >
> > ln -s jakarta-
> >The problem you are having can be easily resolved by simply editing your
> >local jakarta-turbine-4.0/build.properties or your
> >${user.home}/build.properties
>
> Why could still use symlink as I do in my RPM :)
>
> ln -s jakarta-regexp-1.2.jar jakarta-regexp.jar
Yes, these are all possibl
>on 7/19/01 7:08 PM, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> P.S. I'd like to propose that jakarta-regexp project name all their
> jars jakarta-regexp.jar no matter what version they are. This doesn't
> affect the decision here.
>-1
>Until we have a CJAN, I like version numbers on ja
On Thu, 19 Jul 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jul 19, 2001 at 10:58:21PM -0700, Craig R. McClanahan wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Thu, 19 Jul 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > > Do you have a position on including a jakarta-regexp.jar (or a
> > > jakarta-regexp-1.2.jar or a jakarta-r
On Thu, Jul 19, 2001 at 10:58:21PM -0700, Craig R. McClanahan wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, 19 Jul 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > Do you have a position on including a jakarta-regexp.jar (or a
> > jakarta-regexp-1.2.jar or a jakarta-regexp-1.3-dev.jar) directly in
> > jakarta-tomcat-4.0/lib so we
On Thu, 19 Jul 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Do you have a position on including a jakarta-regexp.jar (or a
> jakarta-regexp-1.2.jar or a jakarta-regexp-1.3-dev.jar) directly in
> jakarta-tomcat-4.0/lib so we can build it without synching and
> building jakarta-regexp?
>
I'm positive Jon
On Thu, Jul 19, 2001 at 09:35:43PM -0700, Jon Stevens wrote:
> on 7/19/01 7:08 PM, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > P.S. I'd like to propose that jakarta-regexp project name all their
> > jars jakarta-regexp.jar no matter what version they are. This doesn't
> > affect the de
on 7/19/01 7:08 PM, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> P.S. I'd like to propose that jakarta-regexp project name all their
> jars jakarta-regexp.jar no matter what version they are. This doesn't
> affect the decision here.
-1
Until we have a CJAN, I like version numbers on jar f
The build files for tc4 refer to jakarta-regexp-1.2.jar.
However, the regexp project currently builds a file called
"jakarta-regexp-1.3-dev.jar". The jakarta-regexp-1.2.jar is nowhere
to be found, so the build breaks for someone (like me) following the
instructions for a clean checkout-and-build
14 matches
Mail list logo
