Re: [VOTE] JK 1.2.8 Stability

2005-01-21 Thread Bill Barker
1, 2005 11:22 AM Subject: Re: [VOTE] JK 1.2.8 Stability Hi, Other users of the forums I maintain pointed me to the index page: http://jakarta.apache.org/site/sourceindex.cgi where still 1.2.6 is listed as recent connector (the links seems symbolic, but I've not tested if it points to the recent ver

Re: [VOTE] JK 1.2.8 Stability

2005-01-21 Thread Mladen Turk
Günter Knauf wrote: Hi Mladen, I think that most if not all users expect that there at the top the most recent version is listed; perhaps we can change the 'Changes from JK 1.2.7' to 'Changes with JK 1.2.8 release' ?? Sure that makes sense. and do you agree that I pick up these changes and put th

Re: [VOTE] JK 1.2.8 Stability

2005-01-21 Thread Günter Knauf
Hi Mladen, >> also I was pointed to: >> http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/connectors-doc/changelog.html >> where 1.2.7 is listed as most recent... >> > This is IMO actually OK. The changes are from 1.2.7. > When we'll have 1.2.8 changes they'll be from 1.2.8 h; then the question is what 'Chang

Re: [VOTE] JK 1.2.8 Stability

2005-01-21 Thread Mladen Turk
Günter Knauf wrote: Hi, Other users of the forums I maintain pointed me to the index page: http://jakarta.apache.org/site/sourceindex.cgi where still 1.2.6 is listed as recent connector (the links seems symbolic, but I've not tested if it points to the recent version or not). Yoav can you handle

Re: [VOTE] JK 1.2.8 Stability

2005-01-21 Thread Günter Knauf
Hi, Other users of the forums I maintain pointed me to the index page: http://jakarta.apache.org/site/sourceindex.cgi where still 1.2.6 is listed as recent connector (the links seems symbolic, but I've not tested if it points to the recent version or not). also I was pointed to: http://jakarta.a

Re: [VOTE] JK 1.2.8 Stability

2005-01-11 Thread Günter Knauf
Hi, > JK 1.2.8 has been available for about a week now. > There has been no bugs reported against this release, > but we need a vote to make it official. > So following the usual criteria, JK 1.2.8 is: > [ ] Alpha > [ ] Beta [ X ] Stable seems to work fine now. Everyone on NetWare please test th

Re: [VOTE] JK 1.2.8 Stability

2005-01-07 Thread Günter Knauf
Hi, apologies that I couldnt follow the list closely the last months, but currently I have some big customer projects which take all my time, and only allow to look for Apache2.x and PHP which are needed for the projects... > JK 1.2.8 has been available for about a week now. > There has been no

Re: [VOTE] JK 1.2.8 Stability

2005-01-07 Thread Mladen Turk
Jess Holle wrote: I'm not a commiter, but... I tried with our app on Windows (didn't get time for Solaris and AIX yet) and it worked just fine. Thanks. We finally have three commiter votes, so it's officially stable :) Mladen. -

Re: [VOTE] JK 1.2.8 Stability

2005-01-07 Thread Jess Holle
I'm not a commiter, but... I tried with our app on Windows (didn't get time for Solaris and AIX yet) and it worked just fine. -- Jess Holle - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTE

Re: [VOTE] JK 1.2.8 Stability

2005-01-07 Thread Henri Gomez
Tried on some internal applications and don't see regression +1 On Thu, 06 Jan 2005 15:49:11 +0100, Remy Maucherat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Remy Maucherat wrote: > > Mladen Turk wrote: > > > >> Jess Holle wrote: > >> > >>> For those of us lurking waiting for the outcome of this vote, it > >>

Re: [VOTE] JK 1.2.8 Stability

2005-01-06 Thread Remy Maucherat
Remy Maucherat wrote: Mladen Turk wrote: Jess Holle wrote: For those of us lurking waiting for the outcome of this vote, it would seem to be extraordinarily slow Yes. Seems like seasons time :). I didn't vote because I didn't test it at all. Maybe I will tomorrow. Question: would it be possi

RE: [VOTE] JK 1.2.8 Stability

2005-01-05 Thread Allistair Crossley
stair. > -Original Message- > From: Mladen Turk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 04 January 2005 18:43 > To: Tomcat Developers List > Subject: Re: [VOTE] JK 1.2.8 Stability > > > Jess Holle wrote: > > For those of us lurking waiting for the outcome of this > vote, it

Re: [VOTE] JK 1.2.8 Stability

2005-01-04 Thread Remy Maucherat
Mladen Turk wrote: Jess Holle wrote: For those of us lurking waiting for the outcome of this vote, it would seem to be extraordinarily slow Yes. Seems like seasons time :). I didn't vote because I didn't test it at all. Maybe I will tomorrow. Rémy --

Re: [VOTE] JK 1.2.8 Stability

2005-01-04 Thread Mladen Turk
Jess Holle wrote: For those of us lurking waiting for the outcome of this vote, it would seem to be extraordinarily slow Yes. Seems like seasons time :). Mladen. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional comm

Re: [VOTE] JK 1.2.8 Stability

2005-01-04 Thread Jess Holle
For those of us lurking waiting for the outcome of this vote, it would seem to be extraordinarily slow That's not to say I don't appreciate the freely given time of those involved or the time they're taking to evaluate 1.2.8. On the other hand, it would be very good to bring this to some cl

Re: [VOTE] JK 1.2.8 Stability

2004-12-30 Thread jean-frederic clere
It looks stable for me ;-) Season Greetings Jean-Frederic - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[VOTE] JK 1.2.8 Stability

2004-12-28 Thread Mladen Turk
Hi, JK 1.2.8 has been available for about a week now. There has been no bugs reported against this release, but we need a vote to make it official. So following the usual criteria, JK 1.2.8 is: [ ] Alpha [ ] Beta [ X ] Stable Regards, Mladen.