Re: [VOTE] Proposed Tomcat 4.0-Beta-2 Code Freeze Date

2001-03-20 Thread Jon Stevens
on 3/19/01 8:32 PM, "Craig R. McClanahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > +1 [ ] I support the proposed release, and will work to support it > +0 [X] I support the proposed release, but cannot work on it > at this time > -0 [ ] I do not support the proposed release, but do not have an > alt

Re: [VOTE] Proposed Tomcat 4.0-Beta-2 Code Freeze Date

2001-03-20 Thread Glenn Nielsen
"Craig R. McClanahan" wrote: > > On Tue, 20 Mar 2001, Glenn Nielsen wrote: > > > "Craig R. McClanahan" wrote: > > > > > > There have been a large number of feature additions and bug fixes to the > > > Tomcat 4.0 code base since Tomcat 4.0-beta-1 was published in > > > January. This includes imp

Re: [VOTE] Proposed Tomcat 4.0-Beta-2 Code Freeze Date

2001-03-20 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Tue, 20 Mar 2001, Glenn Nielsen wrote: > "Craig R. McClanahan" wrote: > > > > There have been a large number of feature additions and bug fixes to the > > Tomcat 4.0 code base since Tomcat 4.0-beta-1 was published in > > January. This includes implementation of some changes to the servlet

Re: [VOTE] Proposed Tomcat 4.0-Beta-2 Code Freeze Date

2001-03-20 Thread Glenn Nielsen
"Craig R. McClanahan" wrote: > > There have been a large number of feature additions and bug fixes to the > Tomcat 4.0 code base since Tomcat 4.0-beta-1 was published in > January. This includes implementation of some changes to the servlet API > that have been approved by the JSR-053 expert gro

RE: [VOTE] Proposed Tomcat 4.0-Beta-2 Code Freeze Date

2001-03-20 Thread GOMEZ Henri
>- Clip and Return This Portion - > >+1 [ ] I support the proposed release, and will work to support it >+0 [ ] I support the proposed release, but cannot work on it at this time >-0 [ ] I do not support the proposed release, but do not have an alternative to propose

Re: [VOTE] Proposed Tomcat 4.0-Beta-2 Code Freeze Date

2001-03-20 Thread Mel Martinez
--- "Craig R. McClanahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > - Clip and Return This Portion - > > +1 [ ] I support the proposed release, and > will work to support it > +0 [ ] I support the proposed release, but > cannot work on it > at this time > -0 [ ] I d

Re: [VOTE] Proposed Tomcat 4.0-Beta-2 Code Freeze Date

2001-03-20 Thread Pier P. Fumagalli
Craig R. McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > -0 [X] I do not support the proposed release, but do not have an > alternative to propose Just got to Dublin, and let me tell you, it's AWFUL... :( I'll try to make it, but... Pier (somewhere in Europe... This time Dublin???) --

Re: [VOTE] Proposed Tomcat 4.0-Beta-2 Code Freeze Date

2001-03-19 Thread Amy Roh
- Clip and Return This Portion - +1 [X] I support the proposed release, and will work to support it +0 [ ] I support the proposed release, but cannot work on it at this time -0 [ ] I do not support the proposed release, but do not have an a

Re: [VOTE] Proposed Tomcat 4.0-Beta-2 Code Freeze Date

2001-03-19 Thread Kief Morris
Craig R. McClanahan typed the following on 08:32 PM 3/19/2001 -0800 >- Clip and Return This Portion - > >+1 [ ] I support the proposed release, and will work to support it >+0 [ ] I support the proposed release, but cannot work on it > at this time >-0 [ ]

Re: [VOTE] Proposed Tomcat 4.0-Beta-2 Code Freeze Date

2001-03-19 Thread Remy Maucherat
> - Clip and Return This Portion - > > +1 [X] I support the proposed release, and will work to support it > +0 [ ] I support the proposed release, but cannot work on it > at this time > -0 [ ] I do not support the proposed release, but do not have an >

[VOTE] Proposed Tomcat 4.0-Beta-2 Code Freeze Date

2001-03-19 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
There have been a large number of feature additions and bug fixes to the Tomcat 4.0 code base since Tomcat 4.0-beta-1 was published in January. This includes implementation of some changes to the servlet API that have been approved by the JSR-053 expert group, and a fix for a cross site JavaScrip