> -Original Message-
> From: Angus Mezick
>
> Yup, I think I misinterpreted what you said in the email back
> then. I wasn't able to rid myself of the assumption that jk
> lbfactor and jk2 lb_factor behave the same. That assumption
> is now dead. If you reply to my email with the
docs.
--Angus
> -Original Message-
> From: Mladen Turk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, April 09, 2004 12:07 PM
> To: 'Tomcat Developers List'
> Subject: RE: I think lb_factor in JK2 is broken (or just
> backwards from JK)
>
>
>
>
> >
> -Original Message-
> From: Angus Mezick
>
> So, the only relationship between JK lbfactor and JK2
> lb_factor is in their names and the fact they have SOMETHING
> to do with load balancing.
> They definetly don't seem to do the same thing.
I gave you detailed explanation how the l
Friday, April 09, 2004 11:02 AM
> To: Tomcat Developers List
> Subject: Re: I think lb_factor in JK2 is broken (or just
> backwards from JK)
>
>
> Angus Mezick wrote:
>
> > I forgot to mention that I am using the following software:
> > Apache: apache_2.0.47-w
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: I think lb_factor in JK2 is broken (or just
backwards from JK)
Web01 is running apache
Web01 and web02 are running tomcat
I set web01 to lb_factor=1
I set web02 to lb_factor=15
From what I see in code, lb_factor is used as increment and not as
load factor...
if
; To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: I think lb_factor in JK2 is broken (or just
> backwards from JK)
>
>
> Web01 is running apache
> Web01 and web02 are running tomcat
> I set web01 to lb_factor=1
> I set web02 to lb_factor=15
>
> I would expect web02 to get 15 requests
Web01 is running apache
Web01 and web02 are running tomcat
I set web01 to lb_factor=1
I set web02 to lb_factor=15
I would expect web02 to get 15 requests for every 1 request that web01
gets. In reality the reverse happens!! Web01 gets 15 requests for
every one that web02 gets. To test this I ju
