-1
Marc Saegesser
> -Original Message-
> From: Pier Fumagalli [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 2:03 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Bug Notification E-Mails
>
>
> "Christopher Cain" <[EMAIL PROTECT
[X] +1 Tomcat-Dev should definitely be CC'ed a copy of the notifications
[] +0 Sure, why not
[] -0 I don't really care to see them, but I won't complain if I do :)
[] -1 Leave it alone (explain)
Craig
[X] +1 Tomcat-Dev should definitely be CC'ed a copy of the notifications
[] +0 Sure, why not
[] -0 I don't really care to see them, but I won't complain if I do :)
[] -1 Leave it alone (explain)
If the mail came from [EMAIL PROTECTED], it will be easy to have
rules to filter them, but it's allrea
one by yourself.
> -Original Message-
> From: Jon Stevens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 9:47 PM
> To: tomcat-dev
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Bug Notification E-Mails
>
>
> I just have to say that it is cute how all of you get your panties into a
> wa
o: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Bug Notification E-Mails
>
>
>
> Jon Stevens wrote:
> > I just have to say that it is cute how all of you get your
> panties into a
> > wad when I suggest something and then end up going with my original
> > suggestion.
>
On Mon, 10 Sep 2001, Pier Fumagalli wrote:
> Ok, so since I need to try to be the nice guy over here, let's do it this
> way... It seems apparent that the mailing list want to be notified of bugs
> (lots of +1 and no -1), so this is a simple one
>
> [ ] +1 - I want all messages to a new tomcat-bu
"Jon Stevens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I just have to say that it is cute how all of you get your panties into a
> wad when I suggest something and then end up going with my original
> suggestion.
>
> :-)
>
> -jon (runs for cover)
Someone might call it "I'm so freaking tired of it so that
Jon Stevens wrote:
> I just have to say that it is cute how all of you get your panties into a
> wad when I suggest something and then end up going with my original
> suggestion.
>
> :-)
>
> -jon (runs for cover)
>
*sigh* ... ever the diplomat ;-)
- Christopher
/**
* Pleurez, pleurez, mes
I just have to say that it is cute how all of you get your panties into a
wad when I suggest something and then end up going with my original
suggestion.
:-)
-jon (runs for cover)
; To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Bug Notification E-Mails
>
>
> "Remy Maucherat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >> [ ] +1 - I want all messages to a new tomcat-bugs mailing list
> >> [X] -1 - I want all messages to tomcat-dev
> >
>
-1 for the same reasons.
Amy
Pier Fumagalli wrote:
> "Remy Maucherat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >> [ ] +1 - I want all messages to a new tomcat-bugs mailing list
> >> [X] -1 - I want all messages to tomcat-dev
> >
> > Rationale is: I want other developers to look at the outstanding bugs, a
"Remy Maucherat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> [ ] +1 - I want all messages to a new tomcat-bugs mailing list
>> [X] -1 - I want all messages to tomcat-dev
>
> Rationale is: I want other developers to look at the outstanding bugs, and
> tomcat-dev is the dev list for Tomcat, so I don't see the p
> "Christopher Cain" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Also, while I might technically have the ability to call for a vote on
> > anything, it's bad form to call a vote on something that you personally
> > cannot make happen. Since I do not have the ability to set up a new
> > mailing list, it woul
"Christopher Cain" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Also, while I might technically have the ability to call for a vote on
> anything, it's bad form to call a vote on something that you personally
> cannot make happen. Since I do not have the ability to set up a new
> mailing list, it would be the eq
You are right Christopher.
Besides the (a bit sarcastic[*]) sense of humor and besides knowing some
Latin expressions, you also make a lot of sense.
=:o)
Thanks for taking the time to explain it to me. (Seriously!)
Have fun,
Paulo
[*] Which is a "plus".
> -Original Message-
> From:
There were a few reasons that I didn't include a "separate mailing list"
option in the vote. There seemed to be more a little more support for
just having them come here to the dev list, and it's hard to effectively
call a vote on three options instead of two, so I picked the one that
would be
Whenever a bug is entered or modified on Nagoya Bugzilla, should Tomcat-Dev
receive a copy of the automatic e-mail notification sent to the
"assigned"
developer?
[X] +1 Tomcat-Dev should definitely be CC'ed a copy of the notifications
[] +0 Sure, why not
[] -0 I don't really care to see them,
+1, Jon has a point. ( I was among those bad guys who sugested the current
behavior, mea culpa )
Costin
On Mon, 10 Sep 2001, Christopher Cain wrote:
> I'm going to go ahead and call this, in the name of peace and brotherhood :)
>
> -
>
> Whenever a bug is entered or modified on Nagoya B
Christopher,
Since you are the VOTE proponent, could you take a look at my previous
suggestion:
- having a "tomcat-bugs" mailing list;
- having a _daily digest_ to "tomcat-dev" (which should refer the
existence of the bugs list).
It was made clear along this discussion that BUG messages
+1
Saludos ,
Ignacio J. Ortega
> -Mensaje original-
> De: Christopher Cain [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Enviado el: lunes 10 de septiembre de 2001 9:08
> Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Asunto: [VOTE] Bug Notification E-Mails
>
>
> I'm going to go ahead and call this, in the name of peace
+1
there's a couple reasons i'd like to see notifications sent to tomcat-dev:
1) i might be able to (help) fix the bug
2) the bug may affect me, and i don't even know it (yet)
and, of course, i'm just plain nosy :)
> Whenever a bug is entered or modified on Nagoya Bugzilla,
> should Tomcat-De
Christopher Cain wrote:
>
> I'm going to go ahead and call this, in the name of peace and brotherhood :)
>
> -
>
> Whenever a bug is entered or modified on Nagoya Bugzilla, should Tomcat-Dev
> receive a copy of the automatic e-mail notification sent to the "assigned"
> developer?
>
> [
> -
>
> Whenever a bug is entered or modified on Nagoya Bugzilla, should Tomcat-Dev
> receive a copy of the automatic e-mail notification sent to the "assigned"
> developer?
>
> [X] +1 Tomcat-Dev should definitely be CC'ed a copy of the notifications
> [] +0 Sure, why not
> [] -0 I don't
on 9/10/01 12:19 AM, "Remy Maucherat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Since we're at putting more eyballs on some bugs, if someone could come up
> with a reliable test case for bug 3511
> (http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3511), which was reported
> by Jon, that would be great :)
>
> I'm going to go ahead and call this, in the name of peace and brotherhood
:)
>
> -
>
> Whenever a bug is entered or modified on Nagoya Bugzilla, should
Tomcat-Dev
> receive a copy of the automatic e-mail notification sent to the "assigned"
> developer?
>
> [X] +1 Tomcat-Dev should defini
Quoting Christopher Cain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> [X] +1 Tomcat-Dev should definitely be CC'ed a copy of the
> notifications
> [] +0 Sure, why not
> [] -0 I don't really care to see them, but I won't complain if I do :)
> [] -1 Leave it alone (explain)
- Christopher
26 matches
Mail list logo
