e right away since I know that
you are trying to get a release out.
-- Marc
> -Original Message-
> From: Bill Barker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, August 29, 2003 10:16 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [j-t-c] Thread problem in jk_uri_worker_map.c
>
gesser [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, August 29, 2003 4:41 PM
> To: Tomcat Developers List
> Subject: RE: [j-t-c] Thread problem in jk_uri_worker_map.c
>
> The file common/jk_connect.c no longer compiles on Win32 because the
> in_addr_t type is not defined on that plat
host,
-- Marc
> -Original Message-
> From: Marc Saegesser [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, August 29, 2003 4:41 PM
> To: Tomcat Developers List
> Subject: RE: [j-t-c] Thread problem in jk_uri_worker_map.c
>
> The file common/jk_connect.c no longer compiles on W
> Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 8:55 AM
> To: Tomcat Developers List
> Subject: Re: [j-t-c] Thread problem in jk_uri_worker_map.c
>
> Henri Gomez wrote:
> > Marc Saegesser a écrit :
> >
> >> That makes sense. The manipulations that map_uri_to_worker() does
> al
Henri Gomez wrote:
Marc Saegesser a écrit :
That makes sense. The manipulations that map_uri_to_worker() does always
make the string shorter so there is no need to worry about the modifiable
string passed in being too short and needing reallocated.
Trying to fix this in the jk/common code is, I t
Marc Saegesser a écrit :
That makes sense. The manipulations that map_uri_to_worker() does always
make the string shorter so there is no need to worry about the modifiable
string passed in being too short and needing reallocated.
Trying to fix this in the jk/common code is, I think, a waste of ef
> -Original Message-
> From: Bill Barker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, August 15, 2003 7:16 PM
> To: Tomcat Developers List
> Subject: Re: [j-t-c] Thread problem in jk_uri_worker_map.c
>
> The easiest solution would be to change the map_uri_to_worker contract t
The easiest solution would be to change the map_uri_to_worker contract to be
that the uri parameter is modifiable. Then Apache can dup it using the
request's pool, it looks like IIS is doing this most of the time anyway, and
Netscape isn't using map_uri_to_worker at all. That leave Domino, which
