RE: Bug 4690: sessions not scoped according to spec section 7.3

2004-10-12 Thread Shapira, Yoav
Hola, >> What I see is that you have engaged in a widespread political >> campaign >> to have this changed, rather than rely on technical issues. I really >> hate this kind of tactic. >> > >I'm not quite sure what you are referring to. > >So far I have: >(a) Discussed this on the Pluto-

Re: Bug 4690: sessions not scoped according to spec section 7.3

2004-10-11 Thread Remy Maucherat
Nick Lothian wrote: It should be extremely obvious that your little scheme relies only on the fact that you will be able to set cookies from an included resource. This is something which is unlikely to happen, given that: - data is quite likely to have already been sent back (the response is n

RE: Bug 4690: sessions not scoped according to spec section 7.3

2004-10-11 Thread Nick Lothian
> > > >What do people think? Have I persuaded anyone yet? > > > What I see is that you have engaged in a widespread political > campaign > to have this changed, rather than rely on technical issues. I really > hate this kind of tactic. > I'm not quite sure what you are referring to. So far I

Re: Bug 4690: sessions not scoped according to spec section 7.3

2004-10-11 Thread Remy Maucherat
Nick Lothian wrote: Issue 4690 relates to the Tomcat implementation of cross-context sessions. The Pluto (JSR-168 Portlet RI) team need the behaviour in this area changed to be able to properly implement JSR-168. I understand that this is a