Yoav Shapira wrote:
Hi,
IT might be the manager that's wrong. When editing server.xml or
context.xml files for those Tomcat versions, users should use path="" and
not path="/". The latter leads to significant failures.
Well, sort of. The only place where you can still use it is server.xml,
thoug
TECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 11, 2005 4:59 PM
To: Tomcat Developers List
Subject: Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28867] - Documentation mentions zero-length
string for root context path instead of "/"
The manager would be wrong if:
a) we had a consistent way of handling the ROOT context
b) the agr
omcat Developers List'
Subject: RE: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28867] - Documentation mentions zero-length
string for root context path instead of "/"
Hi,
The docs agree with the behavior only for the manager, that's the problem.
Previously the docs agreed with the configuration instructions, e.g
ssage-
From: Mark Thomas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 11, 2005 4:59 PM
To: Tomcat Developers List
Subject: Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28867] - Documentation mentions zero-length
string for root context path instead of "/"
The manager would be wrong if:
a) we had a co
: Mark Thomas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 11, 2005 4:30 PM
To: Tomcat Developers List
Subject: Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28867] - Documentation mentions zero-length
string for root context path instead of "/"
I did a quick test (on TC4 and TC5) before changing the docs.
PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 11, 2005 4:30 PM
To: Tomcat Developers List
Subject: Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28867] - Documentation mentions zero-length
string for root context path instead of "/"
I did a quick test (on TC4 and TC5) before changing the docs.
http://localhost:8080/manager/
I did a quick test (on TC4 and TC5) before changing the docs.
http://localhost:8080/manager/reload?path=/
returns
OK - Reloaded application at context path /
http://localhost:8080/manager/reload?path=
returns
FAIL - Invalid context path was specified
Mark
Yoav Shapira wrote:
Hi,
I thought the docs
Hi,
I thought the docs were right, path="" for the ROOT, not path="/". And
therefore I thought this was an invalid bug report. Was I wrong?
Yoav
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 11, 2005 4:11 PM
To: tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.or
