Yep, this is a problem. And, as I said, we don't have keystores, so
even if it did pick up the new cert it still wouldn't work for us.
jean-frederic clere wrote:
OK I have added a new CA using:
+++
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ $JAVA_HOME/bin/keytool -import -trustcacerts -file
Chad La Joie wrote:
jean-frederic clere wrote:
Chad La Joie wrote:
Yeah, I know what mod-ssl says, and for most cases it's probably right,
however the optional_no_ca option is interesting to us because it
provides exactly the functionality that we need; accepting the client
cert, putting
Chad La Joie wrote:
Hey guys,
I was wondering if there were any thoughts on this particular
suggestion. I hadn't seen anything on the list.
Have you tried to use keystoreType=PKCS12 in the connector?
Chad La Joie wrote:
Good Morning,
I work on the Internet2 Shibboleth project and
Chad La Joie wrote:
Hey guys,
I was wondering if there were any thoughts on this particular
suggestion. I hadn't seen anything on the list.
BTW: mod-ssl says:
+++
In practice only levels none and require are really interesting, because level
optional doesn't work with all browsers and
Yeah, I know what mod-ssl says, and for most cases it's probably right,
however the optional_no_ca option is interesting to us because it
provides exactly the functionality that we need; accepting the client
cert, putting it in a standard place, and allowing our application to do
the verification
Chad La Joie wrote:
Yeah, I know what mod-ssl says, and for most cases it's probably right,
however the optional_no_ca option is interesting to us because it
provides exactly the functionality that we need; accepting the client
cert, putting it in a standard place, and allowing our application
jean-frederic clere wrote:
Chad La Joie wrote:
Yeah, I know what mod-ssl says, and for most cases it's probably right,
however the optional_no_ca option is interesting to us because it
provides exactly the functionality that we need; accepting the client
cert, putting it in a standard
Hey guys,
I was wondering if there were any thoughts on this particular
suggestion. I hadn't seen anything on the list.
Chad La Joie wrote:
Good Morning,
I work on the Internet2 Shibboleth project and we've run in to an
issue with client cert authentication in a stand alone Tomcat
su correo ha sido recepcionado. gracias
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
su correo ha sido recepcionado. gracias
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
su correo ha sido recepcionado. gracias
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
su correo ha sido recepcionado. gracias
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
su correo ha sido recepcionado. gracias
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
su correo ha sido recepcionado. gracias
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
su correo ha sido recepcionado. gracias
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
su correo ha sido recepcionado. gracias
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
su correo ha sido recepcionado. gracias
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
in
windows than Apache + Tomcat.
So, I agree with Jon on this one. I guess he is not a (complete) asshole.
=;o)
Have fun,
Paulo Gaspar
-Original Message-
From: Jon Stevens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 29, 2000 00:00
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Feature Request
on 12/29/2000 4:29 AM, "Paulo Gaspar" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I (a guy whom still committed nothing) would like very much to have such
feature.
For our development environment would be fine since it is convenient for
us to have Tomcat in many non programmer workstations ('cause of JSP
This would be way down on my list of priorities for a Jakarta project.
If I needed mod_rewrite for testing I would install Apache on my local
development system. Why "reinvent the wheel" just for testing.
Besides, I would still want to test the stuff developed locally on
Apache with
on 12/28/2000 2:25 PM, "Glenn Nielsen" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This would be way down on my list of priorities for a Jakarta project.
It doesn't have to be a Jakarta Project. I never suggested that.
If I needed mod_rewrite for testing I would install Apache on my local
development system.
Is this not already an action item for catalina??
(RewriteValve)
Dave
--- Jon Stevens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
on 12/28/2000 2:25 PM, "Glenn Nielsen"
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This would be way down on my list of priorities
for a Jakarta project.
It doesn't have to be a Jakarta
Jon Stevens wrote:
on 12/28/2000 2:25 PM, "Glenn Nielsen" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This would be way down on my list of priorities for a Jakarta project.
It doesn't have to be a Jakarta Project. I never suggested that.
If I needed mod_rewrite for testing I would install Apache on my
on 12/28/2000 5:28 PM, "Glenn Nielsen" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Apache mod_rewrite is very cool, it comes in handy at times.
Your feature request didn't contain much justifiying why it was needed.
I'm sure you have your reasons, go for it.
I thought its "cool"ness clearly justifies it.
love
24 matches
Mail list logo
