It would require 2 new entries in the avail document in CVSROOT - so while
its possible - I'm not sure if infrastructure would wish to deal with that.
-Tim
Yoav Shapira wrote:
Hi,
Would this work? Or request restricted access to only
- jakarta-tomcat-jasper
-
Thank-you for your e-mail.
Please note that i will be away from the office starting Wednesday June
29th, returning Thursday July 7th, with no access to email. In my absence,
kindly contact Cheri Dueck at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Kind Regards,
Natasha Hasmani
Senior Event Manager
Thank-you for your e-mail.
Please note that i will be away from the office starting Wednesday June
29th, returning Thursday July 7th, with no access to email. In my absence,
kindly contact Cheri Dueck at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Kind Regards,
Natasha Hasmani
Senior Event Manager
Would this work? Or request restricted access to only
- jakarta-tomcat-jasper
- jakarta-tomcat-catalina/webapps/balancer
The user id id would be prefixed or suffixed with soc. This also assumes no
binding voting rights.
Thoughts?
- Drop the soc from the userid ?
- Let them be full committers
Hi,
Would this work? Or request restricted access to only
- jakarta-tomcat-jasper
- jakarta-tomcat-catalina/webapps/balancer
The user id id would be prefixed or suffixed with soc. This also assumes
no
binding voting rights.
Thoughts?
- Drop the soc from the userid ?
- Let them be
Tim Funk wrote:
It appears that 2 (or 3) tomcat related projects have been accepted..
- reverse proxy
- jsp compilation speed
As I understand it, the above two are a done deal. I'll mentor the
second one.
- JSTL tag plugins (Unless this belongs to the jakarta taglib folks)
Oviously it's
Hey,
How should code be accepted for these?
- Create a new sandbox?
- Place on SF then have the mentor commit as needed
SF CVS doesn't work well enough IMO. Maybe the ASF will have a
repository that can be used as a staging area.
- Full commit for the student
I suspect it could
I re-re-read the FAQ and here is what I interpret:
Anyone may submit to Google a proposal (any meaning a student). Google will
then take their favorite 200 and pass these along to the mentoring
organizations. The mentoring organizations can give a thumbs up or down
because they need to
Tim Funk wrote:
For those interested in Summer of code what do we need to do next? Is
having the Wiki up to date enough? And we sit back while participants
submit their proposals and Google chooses whom will get the stipend,
while the folks listed on the Wiki mentor?
For those interested in Summer of code what do we need to do next? Is having
the Wiki up to date enough? And we sit back while participants submit their
proposals and Google chooses whom will get the stipend, while the folks
listed on the Wiki mentor?
I was thinking of using HttpClient. Configuration - I am somewhat undecided.
I like urlrewrite. Its also a BSD licence - so if we use their rules as a
starting point - are we legally OK? (I think the answer is yes)
-Tim
Peter Rossbach wrote:
Hey Tim,
Have you see this fine mod_rewrite
Out of curiosity, is a mod_jk 1.2.14 vote set to occur at some point?
Or are there known issues with 1.2.13 at this point? [My understanding
is that the odd-even release # model is now being followed -- correct?]
--
Jess Holle
Here is more detail of what I was pondering with the reverse proxy.
Topic - Extend the balancer webapp to allow for reverse proxy
Description
-
Write a 2.4 compliant Servlet Filter which will allow tomcat (or any other
compliant engine) to act as a reverse proxy.
Constraints
Hey Tim,
Have you see this fine mod_rewrite filter at http://tuckey.org/urlrewrite/.
What you mean, can we use the common httpclient for backend proxy
implementation?
It has a stable pooling with keepalive handling and http/https support.
Peter
Tim Funk schrieb:
Here is more detail of
Hi,
Correct Servlet Specification violation in reading manifests, aka bug
34993, is quite inappropriate for a full fledged summer project. The bug
is actually invalid, but more generally the project would be far too
short (see o.a.c.util.ExtensionValidator for the implementation of the
Yoav Shapira wrote:
Hi,
Correct Servlet Specification violation in reading manifests, aka bug
34993, is quite inappropriate for a full fledged summer project. The bug
is actually invalid, but more generally the project would be far too
short (see o.a.c.util.ExtensionValidator for the
Yoav Shapira wrote:
Hi,
Yeah, that *is* a great idea. Feel free to edit to the wiki page
(wiki.apache.org/general/SummerOfCode2005), please ;)
I removed two of the projects, so it's ready for new additions.
Rémy
-
To
17 matches
Mail list logo
