Remy Maucherat wrote:
>
> Mark Thomas wrote:
> > Personally I prefer a working example with appropriate
> comments. It also saves
> > me copying it from TC4 all the time ;)
>
> Cool. I think we need docs too (grin) :D
> (I know, I'm being mean)
Fair point though. I'll put it on my list of thing
Mark Thomas wrote:
Personally I prefer a working example with appropriate comments. It also saves
me copying it from TC4 all the time ;)
Cool. I think we need docs too (grin) :D
(I know, I'm being mean)
Rémy
-
To unsubscribe, e-ma
> From: Remy Maucherat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> The servlet should be mapped as /* (to override Jasper and all the
> others), and the welcome file list should be empty, right ?
Yes. Note an empty welcome file list needs to be included to override the
default defined in conf/web.xml
> Maybe a
Shapira, Yoav wrote:
But every time I install tomcat, I go through a set of steps that is
always the same:
- Unzip the distribution
- Remove all its webapps
- Strip server.xml down to a minimum
I suppose I could just write some scripts to do the above, but a
distribution that does it is relatively
Mark Thomas wrote:
From: Shapira, Yoav [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Howdy,
I don't have a big objection. But we removed it from TC5
intentionally,
not by accident. No one has been complaining, aside from the one user
who just voice in a few minutes ago, so we should have a good argument
for addin
Costin Manolache wrote:
Could someone explain what's the (current) difference between our webdav
servlet and slide ? Looking at the site, slide seems to have far more
features ( which is not necesarily good ). Is there a good point of
maintaining 2 webdav solutions ? Could we just bundle slide (
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Mark Thomas wrote:
All,
Any objections to adding the WebDAV web application to TC5?
The plan is to just copy the files across from TC4, modify the build
scripts as
required and make a small change to the web.xml to overcome an issue with
welcome files.
If no-one objects,
> From: Shapira, Yoav [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Howdy,
> I don't have a big objection. But we removed it from TC5
> intentionally,
> not by accident. No one has been complaining, aside from the one user
> who just voice in a few minutes ago, so we should have a good argument
> for adding i
Howdy,
>Yes, but soon you're going to pitch a HTTP-server-in-100k, complete
with
>its own proprietary API ;)
>The embedded distribution is IMO good for a minimal distribution.
;) Not, I don't want a proprietary anything as in the Jetty world.
That's no good for any organization that wants long-
Shapira, Yoav wrote:
Howdy,
Why do it now? I haven't seen demand for it on the user list...
Yoav Shapira
Millennium ChemInformatics
Yes, we are using in TC4 and plan to move to TC5. It is good to have a
quick job done if you do not have enough time for more elaborate system
as in Slide.
Tha
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Yes, but soon you're going to pitch a HTTP-server-in-100k, complete
with its own proprietary API ;)
The embedded distribution is IMO good for a minimal distribution.
I for one wasn't about to :-)
Rather I think that the module-catalog approach broadens the exposure of
the
I have mixed feelings. I don't think it belongs in the tomcat distribution.
I'd rather see the WebDav servlet get moved to another jakarta (commons?)
project. Like commons-webapps, commons-servlets.
But then again the webdav servlet is tomcat specific code and might be hard
being ported to anot
Shapira, Yoav wrote:
Howdy,
I don't think small market shares or lack of clients is a reason for
exclude
a server feature. They are separate. If the WebDAV app added some
negative
impact to the tomcat server, then take it out, but if not, then lets
add it
back in.
Even if WebDAV is useful in the
Shapira, Yoav wrote:
Howdy,
I don't think small market shares or lack of clients is a reason for
exclude
a server feature. They are separate. If the WebDAV app added some
negative
impact to the tomcat server, then take it out, but if not, then lets
add it
back in.
Even if
Howdy,
>I don't think small market shares or lack of clients is a reason for
>exclude
>a server feature. They are separate. If the WebDAV app added some
negative
>impact to the tomcat server, then take it out, but if not, then lets
add it
>back in.
Even if WebDAV is useful in the general sense (
Mark Thomas wrote:
All,
Any objections to adding the WebDAV web application to TC5?
The plan is to just copy the files across from TC4, modify the build scripts as
required and make a small change to the web.xml to overcome an issue with
welcome files.
If no-one objects, I'll do this tomorrow.
-0
an Reschke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Tomcat Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2004 2:01 PM
Subject: Re: [OT] Re: WebDAV and TC5
Jess Holle wrote:
> How does the user use the filesystem driver?
net use ...
> The end-user certainly
Jess Holle wrote:
How does the user use the filesystem driver?
net use ...
The end-user certainly cannot achieve anything meaningful via web
folders. I did a lot of testing in this regard.
Well, I disagree. Lots of my customers use webfolders heavily.
Now if there is a better level of usabilit
Julian Reschke wrote:
Jess Holle wrote:
WebDAV seems to be largely an empty promise due to the lack of
reasonable, compatible clients.
>>90% of all clients are Microsoft Windows.
Microsoft Windows' Web Folders support WebDAV to a *small* degree.
Yet the way this is integrated into the OS is
Jess Holle wrote:
WebDAV seems to be largely an empty promise due to the lack of
reasonable, compatible clients.
>>90% of all clients are Microsoft Windows.
Microsoft Windows' Web Folders support WebDAV to a *small* degree. Yet
the way this is integrated into the OS is at such a level that >9
George MATKOVITS wrote:
Please, PLEASE add it! There is no demand because MOST users do not
know any compatible clients!
Thank you - George
WebDAV seems to be largely an empty promise due to the lack of
reasonable, compatible clients.
>>90% of all clients are Microsoft Windows.
Microsoft Windo
>I don't have a big objection. But we removed it from TC5 intentionally,
ah I missed that,
what was the argument for removing it?
Filip
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECT
atics
>-Original Message-
>From: Filip Hanik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2004 4:14 PM
>To: Tomcat Developers List
>Subject: Re: WebDAV and TC5
>
>+1
>
>why not, if it is in T4, lets have it in T5
>- Original Message -
>From: "Ma
+1
why not, if it is in T4, lets have it in T5
- Original Message -
From: "Mark Thomas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Tomcat-Dev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2004 12:10 PM
Subject: WebDAV and TC5
All,
Any objections to adding the WebDAV web application to TC5?
The plan i
Please, PLEASE add it! There is no demand because MOST users do not know any
compatible clients!
Thank you - George
From: "Shapira, Yoav" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: "Tomcat Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Tomcat Developers List" <[EMAIL
Howdy,
Why do it now? I haven't seen demand for it on the user list...
Yoav Shapira
Millennium ChemInformatics
>-Original Message-
>From: Mark Thomas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2004 3:10 PM
>To: Tomcat-Dev
>Subject: WebDAV and TC5
>
>All,
>
>Any objections t
26 matches
Mail list logo
