RE: isapi_redirector2 build using static APR

2002-07-01 Thread GOMEZ Henri
002 11:15 PM >To: Tomcat Developers List >Subject: RE: isapi_redirector2 build using static APR > > >I'm close to -1 on this, but if everyone else is +1 I'll >change it to -0. > >Apr is a library, just like glib or libc, and I hope soon more >modules and >prog

RE: isapi_redirector2 build using static APR

2002-06-30 Thread Mladen Turk
ynamic run-time, and we are using static, and mixing that can cause problems. MT. > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 30. lipanj 2002 23:15 > To: Tomcat Developers List > Subject: RE: isapi_redirector2 build using static APR &

RE: isapi_redirector2 build using static APR

2002-06-30 Thread costinm
Sent: 30. lipanj 2002 18:45 > > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > > Subject: RE: isapi_redirector2 build using static APR > > > > > > > De: Mladen Turk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Enviado el: 30 de junio de 2002 7:28 > > > > hmmm, th

RE: isapi_redirector2 build using static APR

2002-06-30 Thread Ignacio J. Ortega
OK, +1.. i'll do the changes to the isapi build Saludos , Ignacio J. Ortega -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail:

RE: isapi_redirector2 build using static APR

2002-06-30 Thread Mladen Turk
> -Original Message- > From: Ignacio J. Ortega [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 30. lipanj 2002 18:45 > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > Subject: RE: isapi_redirector2 build using static APR > > > > De: Mladen Turk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >

RE: isapi_redirector2 build using static APR

2002-06-30 Thread Ignacio J. Ortega
> De: Mladen Turk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Enviado el: 30 de junio de 2002 7:28 hmmm, this will force us to make a binary everytime Apache2 has a release too? in this case -1, if not +1 Saludos , Ignacio J. Ortega -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional comma

RE: isapi_redirector2 build using static APR

2002-06-30 Thread Kevin Seguin
> > > IMO it would be better to build the non Apache connectors using static > APR builds. That way we don't need to ship the extra dll's with the > connector. > The dll builds are ok for mod_jk2 since Apache is already there. > +1 (speaking more as a user than a developer these days ...) > I