costin 2003/01/14 10:46:25
Removed: coyote/src/java/org/apache/coyote BaseHook.java
Log:
Rollback...
A much better solution is to just use plain NotificationListener, without
any tomcat/coyote/jk-specific modifications.
All JK and coyote hooks ( "extension points" ) work
Jeanfrancois Arcand wrote:
>>Actually - this is a different story ( JMX-enabling different componets).
>>I'll check in similar additions to ValveBase, BaseContainer,
>>CoyoteConnector.
>>
> Humm..I would like to be able to support hooks/Valves also using one
> approach. I'm not an expert with JMX,
costin 2003/01/10 23:08:33
Modified:coyote/src/java/org/apache/coyote BaseHook.java
Log:
Added NotificationListener.
JMX notifications are not as flexible - I really don't know
what is the best solution here. Less flexibility might be very
good - it can keep things simpler.
Bill Barker wrote:
>> Jeanfrancois Arcand wrote:
>>
>> > Hi Costin, (you beat me on the proposal :-) )
>>
>> Actually - this is a different story ( JMX-enabling different componets).
>> I'll check in similar additions to ValveBase, BaseContainer,
>> CoyoteConnector.
>>
>
> I currently have custom
- Original Message -
From: "Costin Manolache" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 8:16 PM
Subject: Re: cvs commit:
jakarta-tomcat-connectors/coyote/src/java/org/apache/coyote BaseHook.java
> Jeanfrancois Arcand wrote:
>
Jeanfrancois Arcand wrote:
> Hi Costin, (you beat me on the proposal :-) )
Actually - this is a different story ( JMX-enabling different componets).
I'll check in similar additions to ValveBase, BaseContainer,
CoyoteConnector.
The idea is for each component to be aware of its name and domain,
costin 2003/01/10 14:36:43
Added: coyote/src/java/org/apache/coyote BaseHook.java
Log:
Added a base implementation of ActionHook - with some small additions :-)
First, there is a getNext/setNext to allow multiple hooks to be chained.
Both recursive and iterative will be sup
