Re: Struts Build Problems from 11-09-2000 CVS Source

2000-11-10 Thread Ron Bolin
I am making my first attempt at building jakarta-struts from 11-09-2000 CVS source. Setup -- To build struts I first downloaded Ant 1.1 and 1.2 distribution, servletapi source, tomcat source and the tools distribution. I also used Xalan 1.x and 2.0 and Sun Jaxp 1.0.1 where necessary. I

Re: No revolution today

2000-11-10 Thread Matthew Dornquast
In our situation, we plan to use multiple virtual hosts, each with its own root context. That makes the URLs shorter and easier for people to work with. It also lets you more easily move/copy one context to another without having to fix all the links. We use many virtual hosts today in

mod_jk patches for TC 3.3

2000-11-10 Thread GOMEZ Henri
Another patch to add to mod_jk in CVS. It seems that mod_jk present is TC 3.3 CVS is an old snapshot of mod_jk. Many bugs fixes in TC 3.2B6 were missing. I'll take care of that and send patches to TC 3.3. --- jakarta-tomcat/src/native/mod_jk/apache1.3/mod_jk.c.origSat Aug 26 03:21:39

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-4.0/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/servlets DefaultServlet.java

2000-11-10 Thread remm
remm00/11/10 10:33:48 Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/servlets DefaultServlet.java Log: - Fix for a security problem in the default configuration. The DefaultServlet (and WebdavServlet) were set in read-write mode unless the readonly

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat/src/native/mod_jk/common jk_ajp12_worker.c jk_ajp13.c jk_ajp13.h jk_ajp13_worker.c jk_connect.c jk_connect.h jk_global.h jk_jni_worker.c jk_lb_worker.c jk_map.c jk_msg_buff.c jk_msg_buff.h jk_pool.h jk_service.h jk_sockbuf.c jk_uri_worker_map.c jk_util.c jk_util.h jk_worker.c

2000-11-10 Thread nacho
nacho 00/11/10 10:48:53 Modified:src/native/mod_jk/apache1.3 Makefile.linux mod_jk.c src/native/mod_jk/common jk_ajp12_worker.c jk_ajp13.c jk_ajp13.h jk_ajp13_worker.c jk_connect.c jk_connect.h jk_global.h jk_jni_worker.c

RE: mod_jk patches for TC 3.3

2000-11-10 Thread GOMEZ Henri
Even if mod_jk (with ajp13 or ajp12) works well, I've got problem when using custom cookies. Stay tuned and don't replace TC 3.2 with TC 3.3 since ajpX seems to be fixed. "La maîtrise des autres n'est que la force. La maîtrise de vous-même est le véritable pouvoir" -- Lao Tzu

RE: mod_jk patches for TC 3.3

2000-11-10 Thread Larry Isaacs
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 10, 2000 12:50 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: mod_jk patches for TC 3.3 Makefile.linux, mod_jk for apache 1.3 and for jk in common. We must be up to date with stuff from TC

AJP specifications

2000-11-10 Thread Stefan Wengi
Hey, I checked the archives and found that there's no Web connector available yet. Are you planning to use AJP as a protocol? If so, which version and where can the specification be found? (the Apache Jserv pages look some kind of outdated). thanks Stefan -- Stefan Wengi, AdNovum Software

Ready for 3.2b7?

2000-11-10 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
It's been a week now, and I've committed 20 patches to the 3.2 tree, ranging from simple tweaks to security problems to spec compliance bugs. I believe that I've gotten all of the critical bug reports submitted on the mailing lists or via BugRat. Does anyone know of any I've missed (see below

BugRat Report #370 has been filed.

2000-11-10 Thread BugRat Mail System
Bug report #370 has just been filed. You can view the report at the following URL: http://znutar.cortexity.com:/BugRatViewer/ShowReport/370 REPORT #370 Details. Project: Catalina Category: Bug Report SubCategory: New Bug Report Class: swbug State: received Priority: medium Severity:

Re: Patch for bug report #362 (and a patch for a logging error)

2000-11-10 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
Serge Knystautas wrote: Ok, I submitted the bug report this afternoon (#362) about how jasper was mishandling a custom tag of mine. You can read the report if you want, but basically here's what happens... say your custom tag has an attribute to be rtexprvalue and because of the flexibility

Re: [Resend] Ready for 3.2b7?

2000-11-10 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
Marc Saegesser wrote: Craig, I posted the diffs to fix a log file problem in jk_nt_service.c a few days ago. The changes are minor (but fix a really annoying problem) and have been running at my site without problem for about a week. I'm new to submitting code changes to the project so

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-4.0/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/util CookieTools.java

2000-11-10 Thread craigmcc
craigmcc00/11/10 15:38:01 Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/util CookieTools.java Log: Correctly expire version zero cookies by setting a time well in the past. Submitted by: Paul Frieden [EMAIL PROTECTED] Revision ChangesPath 1.2 +10 -5

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-4.0/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/valves LocalStrings_es.properties

2000-11-10 Thread nacho
nacho 00/11/10 15:50:10 Added: catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/valves LocalStrings_es.properties Log: Spanish translation Revision ChangesPath 1.1

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-4.0/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/logger LocalStrings_es.properties

2000-11-10 Thread nacho
nacho 00/11/10 15:52:06 Added: catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/logger LocalStrings_es.properties Log: Spanish translation Revision ChangesPath 1.1

tomcat + ant

2000-11-10 Thread Jon Stevens
How about the idea of updating the build.xml to support the latest version of Ant before the next beta release? :-) -jon -- http://scarab.tigris.org/| http://noodle.tigris.org/ http://java.apache.org/ | http://java.apache.org/turbine/ http://www.working-dogs.com/ |

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat build.xml

2000-11-10 Thread jon
jon 00/11/10 16:11:32 Modified:.build.xml Log: put a - in it cause that is how it comes from Sun. this is also more "standard" imho Revision ChangesPath 1.94 +1 -1 jakarta-tomcat/build.xml Index: build.xml

facade22.jar

2000-11-10 Thread Jon Stevens
During ./build.sh, facade22.jar is placed into the tomcat/lib directory twice (once also in lib/servlet22). Is there a reason for that? -jon - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL

Re: Patch for bug report #362 (and a patch for a logging error)

2000-11-10 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
Serge Knystautas wrote: [snip] The way I got this to work was to overload the setter method to take both a String and an Object... this got it working through Jasper Servlet but not jspc. I don't know if that's a violation of the spec or the way to handle this issue. Yep, it is, and again

Re: facade22.jar

2000-11-10 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
Jon Stevens wrote: During ./build.sh, facade22.jar is placed into the tomcat/lib directory twice (once also in lib/servlet22). Is there a reason for that? I couldn't tell you ... but it's worth mentioning that the main branch of "jakarta-tomcat" (where you committed your change for

Re: About Form-Login-Config

2000-11-10 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
Arieh Markel wrote: I am reading the (2.3) spec and am realizing that I am not able to share a login page with multiple contexts. That's true (also true for servlet 2.2). In our (embedded) use of Tomcat, we have different contexts, but we use a single login form/screen. When

Re: facade22.jar

2000-11-10 Thread Jon Stevens
on 11/10/2000 4:44 PM, "Craig R. McClanahan" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I couldn't tell you ... doh! but it's worth mentioning that the main branch of "jakarta-tomcat" (where you committed your change for build.xml) is the "3.3" development tree. If, on the other hand, you want to use

Re: facade22.jar

2000-11-10 Thread cmanolache
but it's worth mentioning that the main branch of "jakarta-tomcat" (where you committed your change for build.xml) is the "3.3" development tree. If, on the other hand, you want to use the 3.2 branch that I'm preparing for release, you will want to check out branch "tomcat_32" from

Re: [PATCH] Re: Ready for 3.2b7?

2000-11-10 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
Paul and others, See intermixed comments below. Paul Frieden wrote: I've attached 1 patch, 2 modified interceptors, and one new interceptor. These all work with 3.2b6. Please consider these for 3.2b7. Here is what they do: CookieTools.patch: This patch fixes cookie deletion.

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-4.0/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/connector/test HttpProcessor.java

2000-11-10 Thread craigmcc
craigmcc00/11/10 17:38:09 Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/connector/http HttpProcessor.java catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/connector/test HttpProcessor.java Log: When there are multiple instances

Re: About Form-Login-Config

2000-11-10 Thread Arieh Markel
Mailing-List: contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]; run by ezmlm Craig, Costin, thanks for your response. list-help: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] list-unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] list-post: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: "Craig R. McClanahan"

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-4.0/catalina/src/share/org/apache/naming ContextBindings.java LocalStrings.properties SelectorContext.java

2000-11-10 Thread remm
remm00/11/10 17:47:48 Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/naming ContextBindings.java LocalStrings.properties SelectorContext.java Log: - Adds the capability to bind the class loader associated with the current thread to a Context. - The current

Re: About Form-Login-Config

2000-11-10 Thread cmanolache
I guess I must have implemented it in our application ;). It would be nice to contribute that into tomcat3.3 :-) Costin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: [Resend] Ready for 3.2b7?

2000-11-10 Thread Larry Isaacs
Craig, My last commit gets the default error output back to what we had before the exception handling patch. Also, thanks for the patch to PageContextImpl. I can now look forward to "safely" upgrading to Tomcat 3.2 Final. I don't have any other changes in the queue, so I'm fine with building

Re: [OPINION] - New Jakarta Website

2000-11-10 Thread Jon Stevens
on 11/10/2000 8:02 PM, "Rob S." [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The guy's name is Erik Muna, and he did this mockup as a favour to me. Please please check it out, let me/him ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) know what you think. http://www.petfishonline.com/jakarta/ He's very flexible, and all I did was

BugRat Report #371 has been filed.

2000-11-10 Thread BugRat Mail System
Bug report #371 has just been filed. You can view the report at the following URL: http://znutar.cortexity.com:/BugRatViewer/ShowReport/371 REPORT #371 Details. Project: Tomcat Category: Bug Report SubCategory: New Bug Report Class: swbug State: received Priority: medium Severity:

BugRat Report #86 - req.isSecure() returns false even for https

2000-11-10 Thread BugRat Mail System
- Sender's Comment - Hi all This is the tomcat https bug that I filed while I was in HP. This bug status says that this bug has been closed in tomcat_32, I think it means tomcat 3.2. I dont see a release build of Tomcat 3.2 yet, but this would fix the bug. Once this happens, please

RE: [OPINION] - New Jakarta Website

2000-11-10 Thread Rob S.
Hi Jon, Is there a jakarta logo or colour(s) for him to work off of? All I can find is the Apache feather. Any logo and colour scheme suggestions if not? - r -Original Message- From: Jon Stevens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: November 10, 2000 8:39 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [OPINION] - New Jakarta Website

2000-11-10 Thread Jon Stevens
on 11/10/2000 9:49 PM, "Rob S." [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Jon, Is there a jakarta logo or colour(s) for him to work off of? All I can find is the Apache feather. The Jakarta logo is in the upper left hand corner of the homepage. http://jakarta.apache.org/images/banner.gif Not sure how

Re: [jBoss-User] Re: [jBoss-Dev] Re: Mail from Stallman on legalityof LGPL in jboss

2000-11-10 Thread Rickard Oberg
on 11/10/2000 11:10 AM, "marc fleury" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: jon, glad you like it but "taking credit" of the move is something tasteless. I'm very much into taking credit for my hard work. I give nearly 100% of what I do away for free without any licensing restrictions except

RE: [jBoss-Dev] Re: Mail from Stallman on legality of LGPL in jboss

2000-11-10 Thread marc fleury
| There were 2 questions (my questions are indented) | | is integrating the library with other work (without any modification to | the | Library) a "modification of the Library" in case of the LGPL? | | No, it is not. It is just using the library. The whole reason for | the LGPL is to give