DO NOT REPLY [Bug 15693] - Network hangs when running as NT service (with patch)

2002-12-28 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15693. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

[PATCH] Re: ThreadPool

2002-12-28 Thread Michael
Costin Manolache wrote: You're probably right that addThread() doesn't need to be public - but I don't think it hurts too much either. It does when you're trying to refactor a class. It forces you to ask whether the interface really is used, or can you rearrange like you want to. Usually I

Re: [PATCH] Re: ThreadPool

2002-12-28 Thread Michael
Umm...that last patch won't compile, I forgot to remove a line. Knew I was forgetting to do something. :-[ -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [PATCH] Re: ThreadPool

2002-12-28 Thread Remy Maucherat
Michael wrote: Costin Manolache wrote: You're probably right that addThread() doesn't need to be public - but I don't think it hurts too much either. It does when you're trying to refactor a class. It forces you to ask whether the interface really is used, or can you rearrange like you

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-4.0/webapps/tomcat-docs/appdev build.xml.txt

2002-12-28 Thread jfclere
jfclere 2002/12/28 01:08:58 Modified:webapps/tomcat-docs/appdev build.xml.txt Log: typo ;-) Revision ChangesPath 1.7 +2 -2 jakarta-tomcat-4.0/webapps/tomcat-docs/appdev/build.xml.txt Index: build.xml.txt

Re: [PATCH] Re: ThreadPool

2002-12-28 Thread Remy Maucherat
Michael wrote: Umm...that last patch won't compile, I forgot to remove a line. Knew I was forgetting to do something. :-[ Although refactoring the monitor timer code is relatively safe, the thread pool as a whole is a critical piece of code in Tomcat 4.1.x (= you should test things

Re: [PATCH] Re: ThreadPool

2002-12-28 Thread Michael
Remy Maucherat wrote: Also: MonitorRunnable, now that it has a start() method (for JMX, I presume) has no restriction on running more than one thread. This undercuts the meaning of interval, and makes stop() poorly defined. I would like it if this was fixing any issue the above (which

Re: [PATCH] Re: ThreadPool

2002-12-28 Thread Michael
Remy Maucherat wrote: Although refactoring the monitor timer code is relatively safe, the thread pool as a whole is a critical piece of code in Tomcat 4.1.x (= you should test things extensively after making a change). Since your patch doesn't build, I'll have to assume you didn't try to

Re: [PATCH] Re: ThreadPool

2002-12-28 Thread Bill Barker
- Original Message - From: Remy Maucherat [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, December 28, 2002 12:40 AM Subject: Re: [PATCH] Re: ThreadPool Michael wrote: Costin Manolache wrote: You're probably right that addThread() doesn't need to

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4374] - bypass of authentication mechanism

2002-12-28 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4374. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 14164] - https makes warning

2002-12-28 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14164. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 14164] - https makes warning

2002-12-28 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14164. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 13861] - Authentication / SSL conflict (web.xml security-constraint auth-constraint user-data-constraint)

2002-12-28 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13861. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 13861] - Authentication / SSL conflict (web.xml security-constraint auth-constraint user-data-constraint)

2002-12-28 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13861. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 13861] - Authentication / SSL conflict (web.xml security-constraint auth-constraint user-data-constraint)

2002-12-28 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13861. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 15693] - Network hangs when running as NT service (with patch)

2002-12-28 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15693. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.