-- Virus Warning Message (on uusnwa0p) --
Found virus WORM_NETSKY.Z in file Part-2.txt
.exe (in Part-2.zip)
The uncleanable file
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30833.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Costin Manolache wrote:
Remy Maucherat wrote:
No, you misunderstood.
- jakarta-tomcat-5.5.0.zip - for JRE 5.0, no Admin
- jakarta-tomcat-5.5.0.tar.gz - for JRE 5.0, no Admin
- jakarta-tomcat-5.5.0.exe - for Windows, everything
- jakarta-tomcat-5.5.0-compat.zip - for JRE 1.4 (a few additional
Hi,
OK. I also see Amy has done her commit. So it looks like Friday for
the code freeze, and I'll cut the release Saturday or Sunday. Cool,
Yoav Shapira
Millennium Research Informatics
-Original Message-
From: Jan Luehe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 24, 2004 10:31
Peter Lin wrote:
I normally don't like to post off topic things, but I have a gmail
invite. if any of the tomcat-developers want a gmail account, email
me directly.
And I have 5 more myself :)
Who wants one ?
Rémy
-
To
Hi,
Please make sure target=1.3 is present in all javac tasks :-)
Shouldn't we support only JRE 1.4 and 5.0 instead ? I would be able to
I'm also not big on JDK 1.3 as the default target. I'm +0 on adding a
javaTarget build.properties attribute that users can set to 1.3 but
whose default
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30843.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30848.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30848.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30489.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30848.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30489.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30489.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Please make sure target=1.3 is present in all javac tasks :-)
Shouldn't we support only JRE 1.4 and 5.0 instead ? I would be able to
replace jakarta-regexp use with Java regexp. Obviously people who don't
want to upgrade (ex: I saw a really funny thread on tomcat-user
Shapira, Yoav wrote:
Hi,
Please make sure target=1.3 is present in all javac tasks :-)
Shouldn't we support only JRE 1.4 and 5.0 instead ? I would be able to
I'm also not big on JDK 1.3 as the default target. I'm +0 on adding a
javaTarget build.properties attribute that users can set to 1.3 but
Hola,
I'm personally -1 on droping support for 1.3 ( well, I would be +1 on
supporting J2ME or 1.1 as a baseline :-).
It depends how you define support, right? Does support mean by
default everything is configured for JDK 1.3, and Tomcat is built with
target=1.3 ? Or does it means there's an
Costin Manolache wrote:
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Please make sure target=1.3 is present in all javac tasks :-)
Shouldn't we support only JRE 1.4 and 5.0 instead ? I would be able
to replace jakarta-regexp use with Java regexp. Obviously people who
don't want to upgrade (ex: I saw a really funny
Hola,
Write once, run anywhere - why would you choose a target that will
not
run for a (significant) number of people, and try to force them to
choose between upgrading tomcat and upgrading other software ?
I don't think the number is significant. It's very subjective, and I
have no empirical
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30848.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
I would *guess* that those not bothering to move from 1.3 (for whatever
reason) are mostly the same folk who won't upgrade to a more recent
Tomcat version anyway.
--
Jess Holle
Shapira, Yoav wrote:
Hola,
Write once, run anywhere - why would you choose a target that will
not
run for a
jfarcand2004/08/25 09:50:35
Modified:jsr154/src/share/dtd Tag: TOMCAT_5_0 web-app_2_4.xsd
Log:
Port patch from the HEAD.
Revision ChangesPath
No revision
No revision
1.13.2.1 +2 -2
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30489.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Costin Manolache wrote:
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Please make sure target=1.3 is present in all javac tasks :-)
Shouldn't we support only JRE 1.4 and 5.0 instead ? I would be able
to replace jakarta-regexp use with Java regexp. Obviously people who
don't want to upgrade (ex:
Shapira, Yoav wrote:
Hola,
Write once, run anywhere - why would you choose a target that will
not
run for a (significant) number of people, and try to force them to
choose between upgrading tomcat and upgrading other software ?
I don't think the number is significant. It's very
Jeanfrancois Arcand wrote:
+1 for the vote. :-) I'm in favor of requiring j2se 5.0 (but I work at
Sun so I might have a couple of bad habits ;-) )
There are definitely a lot of places where using the generic collections
would make the code a lot cleaner.
Rémy
Jeanfrancois Arcand wrote:
+1 for the vote. :-) I'm in favor of requiring j2se 5.0 (but I work at
Sun so I might have a couple of bad habits ;-) )
Is the vote to be only on whether to continue to support 1.3? Or the
same for 1.4?
Also, is it just a commiters vote?
Every platform of *any* note
Jess Holle wrote:
Jeanfrancois Arcand wrote:
+1 for the vote. :-) I'm in favor of requiring j2se 5.0 (but I work
at Sun so I might have a couple of bad habits ;-) )
Is the vote to be only on whether to continue to support 1.3? Or the
same for 1.4?
Also, is it just a commiters vote?
Only
remm2004/08/25 10:46:32
Modified:.build.xml
Log:
- Rework the packaging as discussed, with separate bundles for admin and compat.
Revision ChangesPath
1.199 +98 -34jakarta-tomcat-5/build.xml
Index: build.xml
jfarcand2004/08/25 12:25:46
Modified:util/java/org/apache/tomcat/util/http/mapper Mapper.java
Log:
Add missing case to support the following web.xml:
servlet
display-nameServletTest/display-name
servlet-nameServletTest/servlet-name
Shapira, Yoav wrote:
It depends how you define support, right? Does support mean by
default everything is configured for JDK 1.3, and Tomcat is built with
target=1.3 ? Or does it means there's an easy way to set this target
parameter (e.g. a build.properties setting) and build your own Tomcat
Costin Manolache wrote:
Shapira, Yoav wrote:
It depends how you define support, right? Does support mean by
default everything is configured for JDK 1.3, and Tomcat is built with
target=1.3 ? Or does it means there's an easy way to set this target
parameter (e.g. a build.properties setting) and
markt 2004/08/25 13:44:15
Modified:coyote/src/java/org/apache/coyote Tag: TOMCAT_5_0
Request.java
http11/src/java/org/apache/coyote/http11 Tag: TOMCAT_5_0
Http11Processor.java
mturk 2004/08/25 13:54:31
Added: ajp/ajplib/src ajp_link.c
Log:
Not to bad :). Only the ajp_link.c has been lost during
manual moving of ajplib files.
Revision ChangesPath
1.1 jakarta-tomcat-connectors/ajp/ajplib/src/ajp_link.c
Index:
markt 2004/08/25 13:54:36
Modified:jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/runtime Tag:
tomcat_4_branch BodyContentImpl.java
HttpJspBase.java JspFactoryImpl.java
JspRuntimeLibrary.java JspWriterImpl.java
markt 2004/08/25 13:55:29
Modified:jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/logging Tag:
tomcat_4_branch DefaultLogger.java
JasperLogger.java LogAware.java Logger.java
jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/servlet Tag:
markt 2004/08/25 13:56:18
Modified:jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/util Tag:
tomcat_4_branch FastDateFormat.java Queue.java
SimplePool.java StringManager.java
SystemLogHandler.java
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
jfarcand2004/08/25 12:25:46
Modified:util/java/org/apache/tomcat/util/http/mapper Mapper.java
Log:
Add missing case to support the following web.xml:
servlet
display-nameServletTest/display-name
servlet-nameServletTest/servlet-name
The original commit message failed.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: cvs commit:
jakarta-tomcat-jasper/jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/compiler
BeanRepository.java Collector.java Compiler.java DefaultErrorHandler.java
Dumper.java ErrorDispatcher.java ErrorHandler.java
The original commit message failed.
1.4.2.7 +13 -58
jakarta-tomcat-jasper/jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/compiler/JspRuntimeCon
text.java
Index: JspRuntimeContext.java
===
RCS file:
Remy Maucherat wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
jfarcand2004/08/25 12:25:46
Modified:util/java/org/apache/tomcat/util/http/mapper Mapper.java
Log:
Add missing case to support the following web.xml:
servlet
display-nameServletTest/display-name
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30833.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
markt 2004/08/25 14:16:08
Modified:.Tag: tomcat_4_branch LICENSE
Log:
Update TC4 branch to Apache License 2.0.
Revision ChangesPath
No revision
No revision
1.1.1.1.2.2 +205 -51 jakarta-tomcat-jasper/LICENSE
Index:
Jeanfrancois Arcand wrote:
Remy Maucherat wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
jfarcand2004/08/25 12:25:46
Modified:util/java/org/apache/tomcat/util/http/mapper Mapper.java
Log:
Add missing case to support the following web.xml:
servlet
display-nameServletTest/display-name
jfarcand2004/08/25 14:28:35
Modified:util/java/org/apache/tomcat/util/http/mapper Mapper.java
Log:
Rollback this fix since it doesn't handle corrently all cases.
Revision ChangesPath
1.42 +0 -7
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Jeanfrancois Arcand wrote:
Remy Maucherat wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
jfarcand2004/08/25 12:25:46
Modified:util/java/org/apache/tomcat/util/http/mapper Mapper.java
Log:
Add missing case to support the following web.xml:
servlet
markt 2004/08/25 14:46:22
Modified:.Tag: tomcat_4_branch LICENSE
Log:
Align license on TC4 branch with one on HEAD
Revision ChangesPath
No revision
No revision
1.1.1.1.2.3 +0 -13 jakarta-tomcat-jasper/LICENSE
Jeanfrancois Arcand wrote:
Actually, yes, raise them :-) This is the perfect time for raising
issues to the spec leads if we want a fix for the next spec revision.
This mapping issue was sent by the spec leads, so probably somebody
else complained about that.
I have two issues:
a) I don't
Ich werde ab 02.08.2004 nicht im Büro sein. Ich kehre zurück am
31.08.2004.
Ich werde Ihre Nachricht nach meiner Rückkehr beantworten.
Die in dieser E-Mail enthaltenen Informationen sind vertraulich.
Diese E-Mail ist
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Jeanfrancois Arcand wrote:
Actually, yes, raise them :-) This is the perfect time for raising
issues to the spec leads if we want a fix for the next spec revision.
This mapping issue was sent by the spec leads, so probably somebody
else complained about that.
I have
remm2004/08/25 17:21:10
Modified:.build.xml
Log:
- Fix packaging issues.
Revision ChangesPath
1.200 +3 -0 jakarta-tomcat-5/build.xml
Index: build.xml
===
RCS file:
Encrypted message is available.
+++ Attachment: No Virus found
+++ Bitdefender AntiVirus - www.bitdefender.com
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
51 matches
Mail list logo
