(Note: I'm talking about the Java code here)
That code is IMO a bit messy. It's fast (it does its job and seems to
beat HTTP for proxying) and works, but I think a cleanup won't hurt.
Some of the issues:
- Deprecation (ex: JkMain is deprecated, supposedly to be replaced, but
I don't see
+0
JK / JK2 are also very specific to our current AJP implemtation.
Maybe they should be called AJP instead ?
PS: Happy New Year to all TC-DEV members :)
On Tue, 11 Jan 2005 10:44:17 +0100, Remy Maucherat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(Note: I'm talking about the Java code here)
That code is
Henri Gomez wrote:
+0
JK / JK2 are also very specific to our current AJP implemtation.
Maybe they should be called AJP instead ?
I thouhgt I had done enough damage with my package renaming and class
moving ;)
The renaming here is nearly all located in strings which are supposed to
be displayed
Hi all,
I posted a message few day ago about the session in
different webapps, maybe it's not well formulated (no
answer).
I'll try to ask once more : how do I have only one
session (an unique ID) in different webapps?
Please help, thanks,
Huu Dung Kieu.
Hej,
Nils Gustafsson har gått i pension. För Jobb-relaterade ärenden kontakta
Marlene Jegeborn: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dear Sir/Madam
Nils Gustafsson has retired. Please contact Marlene Jegeborn: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To
I'm Running Tomcat With J2SE Version 1.4 (j2se1.4.2_03) and I've
integrated standalone admin package in existing Tomcat (version 5.5.4)
installation.
Everything seems to work just fine (managed to start and login into
application)! The only problem is that I can't access and administer
Hosts and
What OS on server and client? We found that certain
flavors of Linux did not perform nearly as well as XP,
for instance. In other words, OS has huge influence on
performance.
--- Peter Lin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've started running a series of benchmarks for
static files. Here are
some
remm2005/01/11 05:37:46
Modified:jk/java/org/apache/jk/server JkMain.java
JkCoyoteHandler.java
jk/java/org/apache/jk/core JkHandler.java JkChannel.java
jk/java/org/apache/jk/common WorkerDummy.java
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33042.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33043.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33042.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33043.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33042.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
remm2005/01/11 06:01:45
Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/core
ApplicationDispatcher.java StandardHost.java
Log:
- Fix bad imports.
Revision ChangesPath
1.42 +1 -2
remm2005/01/11 06:53:26
Modified:webapps/docs changelog.xml
Log:
- Changelog update.
Revision ChangesPath
1.215 +23 -0 jakarta-tomcat-catalina/webapps/docs/changelog.xml
Index: changelog.xml
Because it has never been answered yet, at least not in a way I can
understand.
Or do you mean something else like your getting it repeated.
-Original Message-
From: Sweet Brandalynn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 10, 2005 11:58 PM
To: tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org
Earlier, I wondered if Sweet Brandalynn was trolling for lonely geeks,
or just inadvertently found herself* on this list via some sort of
cack-handed porno spam harvester/autoresponder malfunction.
I have now decided to believe it is the latter, because the idea of a
spammer whining about
Ya, next time I will actually read who sent the email before
responding...
-Original Message-
From: Sue Spence [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 11, 2005 9:51 AM
To: Tomcat Developers List
Subject: Re: Log rotation
Earlier, I wondered if Sweet Brandalynn was trolling for
REMOVE MY E-MAIL FROM YOUR LIST-
Ash, Michael L [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Because it has never been answered
yet, at least not in a way I can
understand.
Or do you mean something else like your getting it repeated.
-Original Message-
From: Sweet Brandalynn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cindy Brzozowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:REMOVE MY E-MAIL FROM YOUR LIST-
Ash, Michael L wrote: Because it has never been answered yet, at least not in
a way I can
understand.
Or do you mean something else like your getting it repeated.
-Original Message-
From: Sweet Brandalynn
Silly Question - doesn't this proposal fit better
in the commons project than Tomcat?
For that matter, I'm rolling the dice that the apr
project itself would entertain the possibilities of
supporting jni / xs / c++ wrappers.
The reason I suggest this is that we have .pkg and .rpm
folks
This isn't targetted at Mladen, but just want the participants
to understand the ramifications. When the Project votes to
release software, it becomes the problem of the Foundation to
stand behind it. If you release without following this procedure,
you own all of the liability, which is a very
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Silly Question - doesn't this proposal fit better
in the commons project than Tomcat?
Perhaps, but the guys that are interested in
both c and Java live inside J-T-C :).
And since it will be buildable independent
of any connector code, it could be moved to
commons or
You have posted to the wrong list. The tomcat-dev list is for people
developing Tomcat. The tomcat-user list should be used for questions
about developing with (ie using) tomcat.
Mark
Kieu Huu Dung wrote:
Hi all,
I posted a message few day ago about the session in
different webapps, maybe it's
You have posted to the wrong list. The tomcat-dev list is for people
developing Tomcat. The tomcat-user list should be used for questions
about developing with (ie using) tomcat.
Mark
Slobodan Vujasinovic wrote:
I'm Running Tomcat With J2SE Version 1.4 (j2se1.4.2_03) and I've
integrated
jfarcand2005/01/11 11:41:57
Modified:webapps/admin/images Context.gif Host.gif
Log:
As pointed by Remy, remove Sun Copyright on those two files.
Revision ChangesPath
1.2 +2 -5 jakarta-tomcat-catalina/webapps/admin/images/Context.gif
Binary file
jfarcand2005/01/11 11:44:38
Modified:webapps/admin/images Tag: TOMCAT_5_0 Context.gif Host.gif
Log:
As pointed by Remy, remove Sun Copyright on those two files.
Revision ChangesPath
No revision
No revision
1.1.1.1.2.1 +2 -5
jfarcand2005/01/11 11:46:02
Modified:webapps/admin/images Context.gif Host.gif
Log:
As pointed by Remy, remove Sun Copyright on those two files.
Revision ChangesPath
1.2 +2 -5 jakarta-tomcat-4.0/webapps/admin/images/Context.gif
Binary file
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
jfarcand2005/01/11 11:41:57
Modified:webapps/admin/images Context.gif Host.gif
Log:
As pointed by Remy, remove Sun Copyright on those two files.
Thanks a lot :)
Rémy
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
sorry, bye bye.
khdung.
--- Mark Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You have posted to the wrong list. The tomcat-dev
list is for people
developing Tomcat. The tomcat-user list should be
used for questions
about developing with (ie using) tomcat.
Mark
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28871.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32779.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Is the current head of the Tomcat 5. building and running? There was a lot
of changes I have been seeing for 5.5.6 that I want but I figured they were
in the Alpha release so I wanted to get the latest when was a good semi
stable nightly build?
Adam Carbone
pero2005/01/11 12:02:14
Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/core
StandardServer.java
modules/storeconfig/src/share/org/apache/catalina/storeconfig
StoreConfigLifecycleListener.java
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
pero2005/01/11 12:02:14
Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/core
StandardServer.java
modules/storeconfig/src/share/org/apache/catalina/storeconfig
StoreConfigLifecycleListener.java
luehe 2005/01/11 12:39:52
Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/core
ApplicationHttpRequest.java
Log:
Fix for 32832 (request.getSession(false) fails to return null).
I believe this bug has been valid: If the session in the foreign
context
markt 2005/01/11 13:08:11
Modified:webapps/tomcat-docs manager-howto.xml
Log:
Fix bug 28867. Correct manager how to to show correct way
to reference ROOT context.
- Submitted by Stephane Bailliez
Revision ChangesPath
1.21 +15 -22
markt 2005/01/11 13:09:35
Modified:webapps/docs changelog.xml manager-howto.xml
Log:
Fix bug 28867. Correct manager how to to show correct way
to reference ROOT context.
- Submitted by Stephane Bailliez
- Ported from TC4
Also replaced a few tabs with spaces.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28867.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hi,
I thought the docs were right, path= for the ROOT, not path=/. And
therefore I thought this was an invalid bug report. Was I wrong?
Yoav
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 11, 2005 4:11 PM
To: tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32832.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32832.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
I did a quick test (on TC4 and TC5) before changing the docs.
http://localhost:8080/manager/reload?path=/
returns
OK - Reloaded application at context path /
http://localhost:8080/manager/reload?path=
returns
FAIL - Invalid context path was specified
Mark
Yoav Shapira wrote:
Hi,
I thought the
I have a valve that does various valve type things, mess with requests,
twiddle cookies, etc.
I need a JSP to be able to communicate with the valve (generate URLS
based on the result of some of the twiddling for example).
The class loaders are doing their best to stonewall me. I have tried
Hi,
IT might be the manager that's wrong. When editing server.xml or
context.xml files for those Tomcat versions, users should use path= and
not path=/. The latter leads to significant failures.
Yoav
-Original Message-
From: Mark Thomas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January
The manager would be wrong if:
a) we had a consistent way of handling the ROOT context
b) the agreed consistent way to reference ROOT was
I am not aware of a) and from a user perspective / seems to make more
sense for b)
At least at present the docs agree with the actual behaviour.
Mark
Yoav
Hi,
The docs agree with the behavior only for the manager, that's the problem.
Previously the docs agreed with the configuration instructions, e.g. editing
server.xml, and disagreed with the manager. So we should clarify in the
docs that what the manager reports as / is actually when you create
Hi,
Big duh on my part. I just realized the bug spoke Only about the manager
docs page. The patch is fine, my mistake, good job fixing it, and thank you
;)
Yoav
-Original Message-
From: Yoav Shapira [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 11, 2005 5:04 PM
To: 'Tomcat
Yoav Shapira wrote:
Hi,
The docs agree with the behavior only for the manager, that's the problem.
No. I only changed the manager docs. The config section of the docs
remains as was - use for the root context.
Previously the docs agreed with the configuration instructions, e.g. editing
kinman 2005/01/11 14:14:55
Modified:jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/compiler
ParserController.java
Log:
- Fix 29771: page encoding in a page directive inside a comment should be
ignored.
Revision ChangesPath
1.56 +19 -52
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29971.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Yoav Shapira wrote:
Hi,
IT might be the manager that's wrong. When editing server.xml or
context.xml files for those Tomcat versions, users should use path= and
not path=/. The latter leads to significant failures.
Well, sort of. The only place where you can still use it is server.xml,
though,
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33027.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32998.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28851.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28830.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
FYI - Remy has made this a lot better in 5.5.x but I don't propose to back port
all his changes.
And with a lot of shiny new bugs too ;) It should be all ok in 5.5.7,
though (the last problems being undeployment of webapps which failed on
deployment).
Rémy
Remy Maucherat wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
pero2005/01/11 12:02:14
Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/core
StandardServer.java
modules/storeconfig/src/share/org/apache/catalina/storeconfig
remm2005/01/11 14:58:54
Modified:catalina build.xml
Log:
- Exclude storeconfig from catalina.jar.
Revision ChangesPath
1.79 +1 -0 jakarta-tomcat-catalina/catalina/build.xml
Index: build.xml
luehe 2005/01/11 15:27:36
Modified:webapps/docs changelog.xml
Log:
Added fix for 32832
Revision ChangesPath
1.218 +3 -0 jakarta-tomcat-catalina/webapps/docs/changelog.xml
Index: changelog.xml
kinman 2005/01/11 15:36:20
Modified:jsr152/examples/num numguess.jsp
Log:
- Fix 32456: Remove extra !--
Revision ChangesPath
1.3 +0 -1 jakarta-servletapi-5/jsr152/examples/num/numguess.jsp
Index: numguess.jsp
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32456.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32776.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hi,
JK 1.2.8 has been available for about a week now.
There has been no bugs reported against this release,
but we need a vote to make it official.
So following the usual criteria, JK 1.2.8 is:
[ ] Alpha
[ ] Beta
[ X ] Stable
seems to work fine now.
Everyone on NetWare please test the
A lot of the code is actually specific to the now-dead Jk2 - if the
native jk2 is gone, probably you should clean up this side as well.
- org.apache.jk.apr - the not-quite apr jni layer that connects to the
native objects, as well as 'in-process' launcher ( I doubt it can be
used by jk1.x ),
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32604.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
- Original Message -
From: Costin Manolache [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 2005 4:14 AM
Subject: Re: Deprecation and JK2
A lot of the code is actually specific to the now-dead Jk2 - if the
native jk2 is gone, probably you should clean up
?
-Original Message-
From: Ash, Michael L [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 11, 2005 9:34 PM
To: Tomcat Developers List
Subject: RE: Log rotation
Ya, next time I will actually read who sent the email before
responding...
-Original Message-
From: Sue Spence
Bill Barker wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Costin Manolache [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 2005 4:14 AM
Subject: Re: Deprecation and JK2
A lot of the code is actually specific to the now-dead Jk2 - if the
native jk2 is gone, probably
69 matches
Mail list logo
