cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jni/native/src network.c pool.c

2005-05-28 Thread mturk
mturk 2005/05/28 00:48:29 Modified:jni/java/org/apache/tomcat/jni Pool.java jni/native/src network.c pool.c Log: Add missing userdata functions for Pool. Those will be used for SSL socket abstraction. Revision ChangesPath 1.5 +32 -1 jakarta-t

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jni/native/src jnilib.c

2005-05-28 Thread mturk
mturk 2005/05/28 01:18:09 Modified:jni/java/org/apache/tomcat/jni Library.java jni/native/src jnilib.c Log: Check if we have at least APR 1.0 and Threading support. Revision ChangesPath 1.6 +10 -2 jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jni/java/org/apache/t

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jni/native/include tcn.h

2005-05-28 Thread mturk
mturk 2005/05/28 01:24:59 Modified:jni/native/include tcn.h Log: Refuse to compile the native if APR_HAS_THREADS is missing. Revision ChangesPath 1.7 +5 -1 jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jni/native/include/tcn.h Index: tcn.h

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jni/native/include tcn.h

2005-05-28 Thread mturk
mturk 2005/05/28 01:29:14 Modified:jni/native/include tcn.h Log: Add classpath prefix to easily change the classpath if desired. Revision ChangesPath 1.8 +5 -4 jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jni/native/include/tcn.h Index: tcn.h

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35113] New: - Possibily to undeploy without removing

2005-05-28 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35113] - Possibily to undeploy without removing

2005-05-28 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jni/native/os/win32 system.c

2005-05-28 Thread mturk
mturk 2005/05/28 04:40:52 Modified:jni/java/org/apache/tomcat/jni OS.java jni/native/os/unix system.c jni/native/os/win32 system.c Log: Update OS info for linux Revision ChangesPath 1.6 +29 -17 jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jni/java/o

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jni/examples/org/apache/tomcat/jni Echo.java

2005-05-28 Thread mturk
mturk 2005/05/28 05:13:02 Modified:jni/examples/org/apache/tomcat/jni Echo.java Log: Update examples to conform to API. Add OS.info display. Revision ChangesPath 1.11 +55 -16 jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jni/examples/org/apache/tomcat/jni/Echo.java Index: E

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35113] - Possibily to undeploy without removing

2005-05-28 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: What to do now

2005-05-28 Thread Remy Maucherat
Bill Barker wrote: Now that we are officially a TLP (and, by the way, congrats Remy :), I think it's more congrats Mladen, as he's the one who wanted it most. what is the migration strategy? From the previous discussions: - repositories: remain the same at the moment, in CVS, as we'll have

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35114] New: - Jasper JSPC does not support a failonerr from Ant

2005-05-28 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

RE: rfe

2005-05-28 Thread Yoav Shapira
Hi, First, please don't cross-post to both tomcat-user and tomcat-dev. > I was wondering if any one other than me has had the need to use a run- > time > 'before-bootstrapping' and 'cleaning-after-at-the-very-end' type of > functionality. If I do, there are other places for this that don't requi

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35114] - Jasper JSPC does not support a failonerr from Ant

2005-05-28 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35114] - Jasper JSPC does not support a failonerr from Ant

2005-05-28 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35114] - Jasper JSPC does not support a failonerr from Ant

2005-05-28 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35114] - Jasper JSPC does not support a failonerr from Ant

2005-05-28 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Unclear 5.0 release status

2005-05-28 Thread Rainer Jung
Hi, the release status of TC 5.0 is a little unclear: http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-5.0-doc/status.html states: Tomcat 5.0.29 was released on October 6th, 2004. Work on the 5.0 branch is primarily for maintenance and bug fixes. It is still considered the best branch for production use

RE: Unclear 5.0 release status

2005-05-28 Thread Yoav Shapira
Hi, > the release status of TC 5.0 is a little unclear: > > http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-5.0-doc/status.html > > states: > > Tomcat 5.0.29 was released on October 6th, 2004. Work on the 5.0 branch is > primarily for maintenance and bug fixes. It is still considered the best > branch

Re: What to do now

2005-05-28 Thread Ian Darwin
On Sat, May 28, 2005 at 04:43:45PM +0200, Remy Maucherat wrote: > > >I'm assuming that we'll need to do a new 'ci' on all of what once was > >jakarta-tomcat*, but did jakarta-servletapi* and jakarta-watchdog* > >follow us? Does it make more sense to "ci" all over again, or to move or copy the e