--
PIXMANIA.COM
N°1 in Europa. Prezzi bassi garantiti. Disponibilita permanente.
--
Ti ringraziamo di averci contattato. Questa risposta automatica
ti è
mturk 2005/05/31 23:34:23
Modified:jni/native/src pool.c proc.c
Log:
Use method id array for callback handler
Revision ChangesPath
1.7 +5 -5 jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jni/native/src/pool.c
Index: pool.c
mturk 2005/05/31 23:35:26
Modified:jni/native/src sslcontext.c
Log:
Fix ssl context creation and pool callback
Revision ChangesPath
1.4 +31 -5 jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jni/native/src/sslcontext.c
Index: sslcontext.c
mturk 2005/05/31 23:36:08
Modified:jni/native/src sslutils.c
Log:
Various utils...
Revision ChangesPath
1.3 +70 -1 jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jni/native/src/sslutils.c
Index: sslutils.c
===
mturk 2005/05/31 23:38:09
Modified:jni/java/org/apache/tomcat/jni SSL.java SSLContext.java
jni/native/include ssl_private.h tcn.h
jni/native/src ssl.c
Log:
Add BIO callback to be able to use callback inside JVM for things
like logging and password
Hi,
I am interested in packaging Tomcat.
So I found (using rpmseek.com) the following files:
tomcat5-5.0.30-5jpp_6fc.i386.rpm
tomcat5-5.0.30-5jpp_4fc.src.rpm
At a first glance, these files looked like what I wanted to create,
but they contain much more than what I expected and I need to learn
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33650.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Bill Barker wrote:
To whom it may engage...
Funny... I don't get it. Which Apache are you using for the test?
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
At 04:44 PM 5/31/2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
After some more digging, it *appears* that apache -k restart WILL do a
graceful restart of Apache2 on Windoze.
Of course it will.
Can anyone confirm this please? And are there any gotcha's to watch out
for? Can someone explain exactly how this
mturk 2005/06/01 01:19:39
Modified:jni/java/org/apache/tomcat/jni SSLContext.java
jni/native/include ssl_private.h
jni/native/src ssl.c sslcontext.c sslutils.c
Log:
Add functions for setting error and password prompt BIO callbacks.
Revision
mturk 2005/06/01 01:20:43
Added: jni/java/org/apache/tomcat/jni BIOCallback.java
Log:
Add BIO Callback interface.
Revision ChangesPath
1.1
jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jni/java/org/apache/tomcat/jni/BIOCallback.java
Index: BIOCallback.java
jean-frederic clere wrote:
Bill Barker wrote:
To whom it may engage...
Funny... I don't get it. Which Apache are you using for the test?
The answer is 2.0 (and it works with today sources for me):
+++ CUT +++
`/x1/gump/public/workspace/jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native/apache-2.0'
mturk 2005/06/01 02:05:08
Modified:jni/native/include ssl_private.h
jni/native/src sslcontext.c sslutils.c
Log:
Rename BIO struct members and strip any CRLF from the prompted password.
Revision ChangesPath
1.7 +3 -3
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project jakarta-tomcat-jni has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project jakarta-tomcat-jni has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34993.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hi,
Correct Servlet Specification violation in reading manifests, aka bug
34993, is quite inappropriate for a full fledged summer project. The bug
is actually invalid, but more generally the project would be far too
short (see o.a.c.util.ExtensionValidator for the implementation of the
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34790.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hi,
I use Apache httpd, mod_jk and Tomcat 5 under Linux.
Re-staring Apache httpd alone should never be a problem.
However when I re-start Tomcat, then I follow this sequence:
- Stop Apache httpd
- Restart Tomcat
- Start Apache httpd
I follow this sequence because mod_jk returns a server error
mturk 2005/06/01 03:45:03
Modified:jni/native/include ssl_private.h
jni/native/src ssl.c sslcontext.c sslutils.c
Log:
Add reference counter to BIO handler, so that multiple context can
register the same BIO.
Revision ChangesPath
1.8 +6 -1
mturk 2005/06/01 04:22:16
Modified:jni/native/src sslcontext.c sslutils.c
Log:
Do not set 'stdin' as default BIO for password promt. Use conio for
WIN32 (curses will be added for posix).
Revision ChangesPath
1.8 +1 -11
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35064.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
mturk 2005/06/01 04:44:37
Modified:jni/java/org/apache/tomcat/jni SSLContext.java
jni/native/src sslcontext.c
Log:
Use sslBIO with index instead two sepatate functions doing the same
thing for different struct members.
Revision ChangesPath
1.5 +4
mturk 2005/06/01 05:06:55
Modified:jni/java/org/apache/tomcat/jni SSL.java SSLContext.java
jni/native/src sslcontext.c
Log:
Add context options settings.
Revision ChangesPath
1.6 +50 -1
mturk 2005/06/01 05:08:29
Modified:jni/java/org/apache/tomcat/jni SSLContext.java
Log:
Fix typo.
Revision ChangesPath
1.7 +2 -2
jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jni/java/org/apache/tomcat/jni/SSLContext.java
Index: SSLContext.java
mturk 2005/06/01 05:10:15
Modified:jni/native/src sslcontext.c
Log:
Fix typo. Use OpenSSL real context for setting the options.
Revision ChangesPath
1.11 +2 -2 jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jni/native/src/sslcontext.c
Index: sslcontext.c
mturk 2005/06/01 05:16:50
Modified:jni/native/src sslcontext.c
Log:
Fix changed function name option-options.
Revision ChangesPath
1.12 +3 -3 jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jni/native/src/sslcontext.c
Index: sslcontext.c
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35156.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35156.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35156.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
mturk 2005/06/01 05:36:24
Modified:jni/java/org/apache/tomcat/jni SSLContext.java
jni/native/src sslcontext.c
Log:
Add quiet shutdown option.
Revision ChangesPath
1.8 +23 -2
mturk 2005/06/01 05:50:51
Modified:jni/java/org/apache/tomcat/jni Address.java Multicast.java
Pool.java SSL.java
Log:
Fix javadocs.
Revision ChangesPath
1.7 +3 -3
jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jni/java/org/apache/tomcat/jni/Address.java
Hi,
Correct Servlet Specification violation in reading manifests, aka bug
34993, is quite inappropriate for a full fledged summer project. The bug
is actually invalid, but more generally the project would be far too
short (see o.a.c.util.ExtensionValidator for the implementation of the
Hi,
JPackage: http://www.jpackage.org/rpm.php?id=1901.
Yoav
-Original Message-
From: Bernard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 01, 2005 2:46 AM
To: tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org
Subject: Tomcat 5 Redhat Fedora rpm question
Hi,
I am interested in packaging Tomcat.
Yep, for all Java RPM based stuff, jpackage.org is your friend :)
2005/6/1, Yoav Shapira [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi,
JPackage: http://www.jpackage.org/rpm.php?id=1901.
Yoav
-Original Message-
From: Bernard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 01, 2005 2:46 AM
To:
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35156.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Yoav Shapira wrote:
Hi,
Correct Servlet Specification violation in reading manifests, aka bug
34993, is quite inappropriate for a full fledged summer project. The bug
is actually invalid, but more generally the project would be far too
short (see o.a.c.util.ExtensionValidator for the
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35156.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35156.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35156.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
mturk 2005/06/01 08:20:14
Modified:jni/native/include ssl_private.h
jni/native/src sslcontext.c sslutils.c
Log:
Handle the Temporary RSA Keys and DH Params.
Revision ChangesPath
1.9 +15 -2
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34895.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34083.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35014.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34790.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35061.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31794.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31794.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31794.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Yoav Shapira wrote:
Hi,
Yeah, that *is* a great idea. Feel free to edit to the wiki page
(wiki.apache.org/general/SummerOfCode2005), please ;)
I removed two of the projects, so it's ready for new additions.
Rémy
-
To
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31794.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31794.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31794.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31794.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
My test box was an HP-UX 9000/800/L1000-44 - Dual CPU (440 MHz)
On my initial tests with the APR connector - the APR connector seemed
slower the old http connector. But the difference is mild and my initial
numbers are flaky. On the same hardware - I am running 6 other instances (of
different
once I finally get the APR build working on my laptop, I will run my
benchmarks and publish the results.
peter
On 6/1/05, Tim Funk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My test box was an HP-UX 9000/800/L1000-44 - Dual CPU (440 MHz)
On my initial tests with the APR connector - the APR connector seemed
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35169.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33650.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
58 matches
Mail list logo