[GUMP] Build Failure - Tomcat 3.x

2003-08-14 Thread Craig McClanahan
This email is autogenerated from the output from: http://cvs.apache.org/builds/gump/2003-08-05/jakarta-tomcat.html Buildfile: build.xml detect: uptodate: msg.ant15: [echo] Detected

[GUMP] Build Failure - Tomcat 3.x

2003-08-14 Thread Craig McClanahan
This email is autogenerated from the output from: http://cvs.apache.org/builds/gump/2003-08-07/jakarta-tomcat.html Buildfile: build.xml detect: uptodate: msg.ant15: [echo] Detected

[GUMP] Build Failure - Tomcat 3.x

2003-08-11 Thread Craig McClanahan
This email is autogenerated from the output from: http://cvs.apache.org/builds/gump/2003-08-06/jakarta-tomcat.html Buildfile: build.xml detect: uptodate: msg.ant15: [echo] Detected

[GUMP] Build Failure - Tomcat 3.x

2003-01-25 Thread Craig McClanahan
This email is autogenerated from the output from: http://cvs.apache.org/builds/gump/2003-01-25/jakarta-tomcat.html Buildfile: build.xml detect: uptodate: msg.ant15: [echo] Detected

Re: [GUMP] Build Failure - Tomcat 3.x

2003-01-25 Thread Bill Barker
, January 25, 2003 1:05 AM Subject: [GUMP] Build Failure - Tomcat 3.x This email is autogenerated from the output from: http://cvs.apache.org/builds/gump/2003-01-25/jakarta-tomcat.html

RE: [GUMP] Build Failure - Tomcat 3.x

2003-01-25 Thread Ignacio J. Ortega
Bill, Nacho: This has been working, like, forever (which with Costin's Modeler changes, is saying something :).If you did a straight copy-over, then it should still depend on commons-logging. Hmmm, I dont completely understand you, i think, worked prior to the move? it should work

[GUMP] Build Failure - Tomcat 3.x

2002-07-30 Thread Craig McClanahan
This email is autogenerated from the output from: http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/gump/2002-07-30/jakarta-tomcat.html Buildfile: build.xml detect: uptodate: msg.jdk12: [echo]

[GUMP] Build Failure - Tomcat 3.x

2002-06-10 Thread Craig McClanahan
This email is autogenerated from the output from: http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/gump/2002-06-10/jakarta-tomcat.html Buildfile: build.xml detect: uptodate: msg.jdk12: [echo]

[GUMP] Build Failure - Tomcat 3.x

2002-06-08 Thread Craig McClanahan
This email is autogenerated from the output from: http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/gump/2002-06-08/jakarta-tomcat.html Buildfile: build.xml detect: uptodate: msg.jdk12: [echo]

Re: [GUMP] Build Failure - Tomcat 3.x

2002-06-08 Thread costinm
On 8 Jun 2002, Craig McClanahan wrote: msg.jtc: BUILD FAILED /home/rubys/jakarta/jakarta-tomcat/build.xml:142: Jakarta-tomcat-connectors repository is required /home/rubys/jakarta/jakarta-tomcat-connectors It seems to be a regression with nightly ant - available returns false even if the

[GUMP] Build Failure - Tomcat 3.x

2002-04-14 Thread Craig McClanahan
This email is autogenerated from the output from: http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/gump/2002-04-14/jakarta-tomcat.html Buildfile: build.xml detect: msg.jdk12: [echo] Detected JDK1.2

[GUMP] Build Failure - Tomcat 3.x

2002-04-13 Thread Craig McClanahan
This email is autogenerated from the output from: http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/gump/2002-04-13/jakarta-tomcat.html Buildfile: build.xml detect: msg.jdk12: [echo] Detected JDK1.2

Re: FW: [GUMP] Build Failure - Tomcat 3.x

2002-04-13 Thread Sam Ruby
Ignacio J. Ortega wrote: We need to fix gump, not tomcat.. So... where is your patch? I had one (other) person ask me for commit access... again without a patch. I ultimately made the fix suggested... and this morning you see the result. It is very difficult to build tomcat 3 and tomcat 4

Re: FW: [GUMP] Build Failure - Tomcat 3.x

2002-04-13 Thread costinm
On Sat, 13 Apr 2002, Sam Ruby wrote: Ignacio J. Ortega wrote: We need to fix gump, not tomcat.. So... where is your patch? I had one (other) person ask me for commit access... again without a patch. I ultimately made the fix suggested... and this morning you see the result. It

Re: FW: [GUMP] Build Failure - Tomcat 3.x

2002-04-13 Thread Sam Ruby
Costin Manolache wrote: Can we build j-t-c before tomcat(3,4) and add a special target for gump that doesn't build j-t-c ? I do build j-t-c (actually util subdirectory) before tomcat(3,4). Let me know what target is desired. BTW, wouldn't it be a good idea to keep the gump descriptors for

[GUMP] Build Failure - Tomcat 3.x

2002-04-12 Thread Craig McClanahan
This email is autogenerated from the output from: http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/gump/2002-04-12/jakarta-tomcat.html Buildfile: build.xml detect: msg.jdk12: [echo] Detected JDK1.2

RE: [GUMP] Build Failure - Tomcat 3.x

2002-04-12 Thread Ignacio J. Ortega
De: Pier Fumagalli [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Enviado el: viernes 12 de abril de 2002 15:10 Can someone fix the damn build? It's 3 days 3.x doesn't build... A tree which should be bugfix only... Pier We need to fix gump, not tomcat.. Saludos , Ignacio J. Ortega -- To

Re: [GUMP] Build Failure - Tomcat 3.x

2002-04-12 Thread Pier Fumagalli
Craig McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This email is autogenerated from the output from: http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/gump/2002-04-12/jakarta-tomcat.html Can someone fix the damn

FW: [GUMP] Build Failure - Tomcat 3.x

2002-04-12 Thread Pier Fumagalli
Sam? Any clue on what's going on? Pier -- Forwarded Message From: Ignacio J. Ortega [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2002 15:25:58 +0200 To: 'Tomcat Developers List' [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [GUMP] Build Failure - Tomcat 3.x

RE: [GUMP] Build Failure - Tomcat 3.x

2002-04-12 Thread Larry Isaacs
Ruby Cc: Tomcat Developers List Subject: FW: [GUMP] Build Failure - Tomcat 3.x Sam? Any clue on what's going on? Pier -- Forwarded Message From: Ignacio J. Ortega [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2002 15:25:58 +0200

RE: [GUMP] Build Failure - Tomcat 3.x

2002-04-12 Thread costinm
-Original Message- From: Pier Fumagalli [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 9:30 AM To: Sam Ruby Cc: Tomcat Developers List Subject: FW: [GUMP] Build Failure - Tomcat 3.x Sam? Any clue on what's going on? Pier -- Forwarded Message

[GUMP] Build Failure - Tomcat 3.x

2002-04-11 Thread Craig McClanahan
This email is autogenerated from the output from: http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/gump/2002-04-11/jakarta-tomcat.html Buildfile: build.xml detect: msg.jdk12: [echo] Detected JDK1.2

[GUMP] Build Failure - Tomcat 3.x

2002-04-09 Thread Craig McClanahan
This email is autogenerated from the output from: http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/gump/2002-04-09/jakarta-tomcat.html Buildfile: build.xml detect: msg.jdk12: [echo] Detected JDK1.2

[GUMP] Build Failure - Tomcat 3.x

2002-04-08 Thread Craig McClanahan
This email is autogenerated from the output from: http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/gump/2002-04-08/jakarta-tomcat.html Buildfile: build.xml detect: msg.jdk12: [echo] Detected JDK1.2

[GUMP] Build Failure - Tomcat 3.x

2001-10-02 Thread Craig McClanahan
This email is autogenerated from the output from: http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/gump/2001-10-02/jakarta-tomcat.html Buildfile: build.xml detect: msg.jdk12: [echo] Detected JDK1.2

[GUMP] Build Failure - Tomcat 3.x

2001-06-26 Thread Craig McClanahan
This email is autogenerated from the output from: http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/gump/2001-06-26/jakarta-tomcat.html Buildfile: build.xml detect: msg.jdk12: [echo] Detected JDK1.2

[GUMP] Build Failure - Tomcat 3.x

2001-06-24 Thread Craig McClanahan
This email is autogenerated from the output from: http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/gump/2001-06-24/jakarta-tomcat.html Buildfile: build.xml detect: msg.jdk12: [echo] Detected JDK1.2

[GUMP] Build Failure - Tomcat 3.x

2001-06-23 Thread Craig McClanahan
This email is autogenerated from the output from: http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/gump/2001-06-23/jakarta-tomcat.html Buildfile: build.xml detect: msg.jdk12: [echo] Detected JDK1.2

[GUMP] Build Failure - Tomcat 3.x

2001-06-09 Thread Craig McClanahan
This email is autogenerated from the output from: http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/gump/2001-06-09/jakarta-tomcat.html Buildfile: build.xml detect: msg.jdk12: [echo] Detected JDK1.2

[GUMP] Build Failure - Tomcat 3.x

2001-05-11 Thread Craig McClanahan
This email is autogenerated from the output from: http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/gump/2001-05-11/jakarta-tomcat.html Buildfile: build.xml detect: msg.jdk12: [echo] Detected JDK1.2

Re: [GUMP] Build Failure - Tomcat 3.x

2001-05-10 Thread Júlio Adrian Miño Van Helden
Please kick me out from this mailing list - Original Message - From: Craig McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2001 2:32 PM Subject: [GUMP] Build Failure - Tomcat 3.x This email

[GUMP] Build Failure - Tomcat 3.x

2001-05-10 Thread Craig McClanahan
This email is autogenerated from the output from: http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/gump/2001-05-10/jakarta-tomcat.html Buildfile: build.xml detect: msg.jdk12: [echo] Detected JDK1.2

Re: [GUMP] Build Failure - Tomcat 3.x

2001-05-09 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Wed, 9 May 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 9 May 2001, Craig McClanahan wrote: This email is autogenerated from the output from: http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/gump/2001-05-09/jakarta-tomcat.html

[GUMP] Build Failure - Tomcat 3.x

2001-05-08 Thread Craig McClanahan
This email is autogenerated from the output from: http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/gump/2001-05-08/jakarta-tomcat.html Buildfile: build.xml detect: msg.jdk12: [echo] Detected JDK1.2

[GUMP] Build Failure - Tomcat 3.x

2001-05-07 Thread Craig McClanahan
This email is autogenerated from the output from: http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/gump/2001-05-07/jakarta-tomcat.html Buildfile: build.xml detect: msg.jdk12: [echo] Detected JDK1.2

Re: [GUMP] Build Failure - Tomcat 3.x

2001-05-04 Thread cmanolache
Ok, 2 changes in ant: copy no longer ignores inexisting source, and the parser changed. Both seem fair changes, we should fix the build.xml in tomcat. I would like to use this oportunity to also upgrade to jaxp1.1. ( in order to avoid too much pain - since tomcat used to build with no

[GUMP] Build Failure - Tomcat 3.x

2001-04-24 Thread Craig McClanahan
This email is autogenerated from the output from: http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/gump/2001-04-24/jakarta-tomcat.html Buildfile: build.xml detect: msg.jdk12: [echo] Detected JDK1.2

RE: [GUMP] Build Failure - Tomcat 3.x

2001-04-24 Thread Steve Downey
: Tuesday, April 24, 2001 8:45 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [GUMP] Build Failure - Tomcat 3.x This email is autogenerated from the output from: http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/gump/2001-04-24/jakarta-tomcat.html

[GUMP] Build Failure - Tomcat 3.x

2001-03-23 Thread Sam Ruby
This email is autogenerated from the output from: http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/gump/2001-03-23/jakarta-tomcat.html Buildfile: build.xml detect: msg.jdk12: [echo] Detected JDK1.2

[GUMP] Build Failure - Tomcat 3.x

2001-03-23 Thread Sam Ruby
This email is autogenerated from the output from: http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/gump/2001-03-23/jakarta-tomcat.html Buildfile: build.xml detect: msg.jdk12: [echo] Detected JDK1.2

[GUMP] Build Failure - Tomcat 3.x

2001-03-11 Thread Sam Ruby
This email is autogenerated from the output from: http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/gump/2001-03-11/jakarta-tomcat.html Buildfile: build.xml detect: msg.jdk12: [echo] Detected JDK1.2

Re: [GUMP] Build Failure - Tomcat 3.x

2001-03-11 Thread Sam Ruby
http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/gump/2001-03-11/jakarta-tomcat.html This appears to be a classpath problem on my end. Will investigate. - Sam Ruby - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email:

Re: [GUMP] Build Failure - Tomcat 3.x

2001-03-11 Thread cmanolache
http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/gump/2001-03-11/jakarta-tomcat.html This appears to be a classpath problem on my end. Will investigate. Build changed - using jakarta-tomcat/build instead of ../build, plus more. The nightly is also broken, I'm working on it. Costin

[GUMP] Build Failure - Tomcat 3.x

2001-03-08 Thread Sam Ruby
This email is autogenerated from the output from: http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/gump/2001-03-08/jakarta-tomcat.html Buildfile: build.xml init: prepare: [mkdir] Created dir:

Re: [GUMP] Build Failure - Tomcat 3.x

2001-03-06 Thread Conor MacNeill
Costin, Is there any reasonable explanation for changing the ant structure ( i.e. removing ant/bin ) ? Besides breaking backward compatibility and forcing people to change their scripts ? We like you to change your scripts on a regular basis to stop them getting stale :-) Seriously Ant's

Re: [GUMP] Build Failure - Tomcat 3.x

2001-03-06 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
Conor MacNeill wrote: Costin, Is there any reasonable explanation for changing the ant structure ( i.e. removing ant/bin ) ? Besides breaking backward compatibility and forcing people to change their scripts ? We like you to change your scripts on a regular basis to stop them getting

Re: [GUMP] Build Failure - Tomcat 3.x

2001-03-06 Thread cmanolache
Thanks Conor, It was a double mistake - Sam set ant.home to a wrong value in gump and I guessed wrong what was changed ( assuming the distribution layout changed). Tomcat doesn't depend on how ant build process works, only on the final directory layout ( in the distrib ). Meanwhile I updated

[GUMP] Build Failure - Tomcat 3.x

2001-03-05 Thread Sam Ruby
This email is autogenerated from the output from: http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/gump/2001-03-05/jakarta-tomcat.html Buildfile: build.xml init: prepare: [mkdir] Created dir:

Re: [GUMP] Build Failure - Tomcat 3.x

2001-03-05 Thread Sam Ruby
Costin Manolache wrote: Is there any reasonable explanation for changing the ant structure ( i.e. removing ant/bin ) ? Besides breaking backward compatibility and forcing people to change their scripts I can fix by specifying ant.home. What tomcat depends on is the distribution layout,

Re: [GUMP] Build Failure - Tomcat 3.x

2001-03-05 Thread cmanolache
I can fix by specifying ant.home. What tomcat depends on is the distribution layout, i.e., "../jakarta-ant/dist". Well, tomcat depends on having ant binaries ( in the normal format ) in ant.home. The convention used is that "foo.home" is the place where a foo distribution is installed, it

Re: [GUMP] Build Failure - Tomcat 3.x

2001-03-05 Thread Sam Ruby
Costin Manolache wrote: Well, tomcat depends on having ant binaries ( in the normal format ) in ant.home. Turns out I had made a change in the jakarta-ant definition (in order to work around another problem), so the ant.home I was passing in the jakarta-tomcat build was not valid. My bug.