Costin Manolache wrote:
Henri Gomez wrote:
More comments on APR and JK2.
While making tomcat-connectors rpm for jk2, and also
jk2 binaries for Linux, I wanted to have apache 1.3 jk2
built with JNI support.
Do you have a multithreaded apache1.3 ? It's very important
to compile it as
Henri Gomez wrote:
Costin Manolache wrote:
Henri Gomez wrote:
More comments on APR and JK2.
While making tomcat-connectors rpm for jk2, and also
jk2 binaries for Linux, I wanted to have apache 1.3 jk2
built with JNI support.
Do you have a multithreaded apache1.3 ? It's very
#ifdef AS400
fp = fopen(workerFile, w, o_ccsid=0);
#else
fp = fopen(workerFile, w);
#endif
Is this abstractive code enough ;)
That was the initial price to have iSeries support in JK2.
But that's rigth, I'll create a jk_os.c to hide this
from main code (in both jk
More comments on APR and JK2.
While making tomcat-connectors rpm for jk2, and also
jk2 binaries for Linux, I wanted to have apache 1.3 jk2
built with JNI support.
JNI support in JK2 requires APR.
So I build an apr 0.9.1 rpm, which include apr-utils
since apr-utils couldn't be built without apr
-Original Message-
From: Henri Gomez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 8:36 AM
To: Tomcat Developers List
Subject: Re: [VOTE] JK2 2.1
#ifdef AS400
fp = fopen(workerFile, w, o_ccsid=0);
#else
fp = fopen(workerFile, w);
#endif
-Original Message-
From: Henri Gomez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 8:48 AM
To: Tomcat Developers List
Subject: Re: [VOTE] JK2 2.1
More comments on APR and JK2.
Ok, I stopped here since I feel there is many works to
conduct in JK2 to
make
Henri Gomez wrote:
More comments on APR and JK2.
While making tomcat-connectors rpm for jk2, and also
jk2 binaries for Linux, I wanted to have apache 1.3 jk2
built with JNI support.
JNI support in JK2 requires APR.
So I build an apr 0.9.1 rpm, which include apr-utils
since apr-utils
jean-frederic clere wrote:
Henri Gomez wrote:
More comments on APR and JK2.
While making tomcat-connectors rpm for jk2, and also
jk2 binaries for Linux, I wanted to have apache 1.3 jk2
built with JNI support.
JNI support in JK2 requires APR.
So I build an apr 0.9.1 rpm, which include
Henri Gomez wrote:
jean-frederic clere wrote:
Henri Gomez wrote:
More comments on APR and JK2.
While making tomcat-connectors rpm for jk2, and also
jk2 binaries for Linux, I wanted to have apache 1.3 jk2
built with JNI support.
JNI support in JK2 requires APR.
So I build an apr
Henri Gomez wrote:
More comments on APR and JK2.
While making tomcat-connectors rpm for jk2, and also
jk2 binaries for Linux, I wanted to have apache 1.3 jk2
built with JNI support.
Do you have a multithreaded apache1.3 ? It's very important
to compile it as multithreaded and link pthread
General:
[+0] Drop HAS_APR flags and dissalow building of JK2 without APR
[ ] Keep everything like it is (the rest doesn't interests me)
Regular expressions:
[ ] Add pcre from httpd-2.0 to the common/pcre
[ ] Add pcre from httpd-2.0 to the srclib/pcre
[+1] Wait if pcre ever comes to the
Even if I agree with using APR in JK 2.1, I think we should first
focus on having a stable JK 2.0 before starting thinking about JK 2.1.
Branching now since premature.
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Henri Gomez
Even if I agree with using APR in JK 2.1, I think we should
first focus on having a stable JK 2.0 before starting
thinking about JK 2.1.
That's good one :).
I agree with that, but would like to make the load balancer to have a
timeout
Mladen Turk wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Henri Gomez
Even if I agree with using APR in JK 2.1, I think we should
first focus on having a stable JK 2.0 before starting
thinking about JK 2.1.
That's good one :).
As I said it's premature to discuss what should be in JK 2.1
De: Mladen Turk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Enviado el: 1 de octubre de 2002 9:16
Althought i agree with the overall goals for a 2.1 release ( i should
say they are nor very ambitious for point release), i agree with Henri
too in the comments he mades, is a bit premature to open a 2.1 relase,
-Original Message-
From: Ignacio J. Ortega
And i agree with Henri also ( and i dont understand your
writing it twice argument ) that to open a Branch right
now, is another development nightmare..
Well, didn't think that it would require a new branch.
Ok, can we at least agree
Well, didn't think that it would require a new branch.
Ok, can we at least agree to the following.
1. Apache2 uses APR
2. IIS uses APR
3. Apache1 can use the APR.
Did iPlanet/NES could use APR on Netware, I'm waiting for Mike
Anderson advices.
Also we should be very carefull with APR
-Original Message-
From: Henri Gomez
We speaked about use of APR in JK2 many times in the past,
take a look
at tomcat-dev mailing list archive.
Know that, but often people change opinions, you cannot blame to
occasionally put that back on ;)
Making APR mandatory for JK2
IMO: one of the main goals of jk2 was modularity, i.e. jk2
is composed of components, each component can use and do whatever
it likes without affecting the other components.
I totally agree that jk2.1 should use APR ( I'll send my vote on
each point ) - but I don't think the old code should be
Mladen Turk wrote:
We speaked about use of APR in JK2 many times in the past,
take a look
at tomcat-dev mailing list archive.
Know that, but often people change opinions, you cannot blame to
occasionally put that back on ;)
That's right. I totally agree that all new code and features
know how to write
the code for such a component.
-Original Message-
From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Costin Manolache
Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 7:13 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [VOTE] JK2 2.1
MT.
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
Mladen Turk wrote:
Hi,
Since there has been general concensus that we should use the APR for
every supported API call.
Here is my design proposal.
General:
[ ] Drop HAS_APR flags and dissalow building of JK2 without APR
[ ] Keep everything like it is (the rest doesn't interests me)
22 matches
Mail list logo