On 12/23/2002 at 9:40 AM Costin Manolache wrote:
It is on my todo list ( I also need this to work, at least for 500 ).
Do you have a patch ?
I have attached an erstwhile patch to the bug in bugzilla. It assumes the
content type of the error-page resource to be text/html and uses rd.include
On Thu, 2 Jan 2003, Donald Ball wrote:
Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2003 10:26:10 -0500
From: Donald Ball [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: error-page status codes broken, no response to bugzilla report
On 1/2/2003 at 9:23 AM Craig R. McClanahan wrote:
Nonetheless, I think the patched behavior is much more correct than the
current behavior and should be applied to cvs.
(Sorry for being out of touch earlier -- holidays and busyness and such).
I do not agree with the assertion that the
On Thu, 2 Jan 2003, Donald Ball wrote:
Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2003 12:49:40 -0500
From: Donald Ball [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: error-page status codes broken, no response
The key issue is that declaring an error-page handler ***replaces*** the
standard container behavior; it doesn't ***augment*** it.
Consider, for example, a webapp that want to implement something like what
the Redirect configuration parameter does for Apache (so that old URLs
still work). In
On 12/23/2002 at 9:40 AM Costin Manolache wrote:
It is on my todo list ( I also need this to work, at least for 500 ).
Do you have a patch ?
not yet, but i'll be happy to work on one for 4.1.x. thanks for taking the
time to respond.
- donald
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL
Are any tomcat developers going to express any interest in this issue? I
frankly consider being completely ignored to be quite rude and a poor way
to interact with the at-large developer community.
- donald
On 12/19/2002 at 12:13 PM Donald Ball wrote:
On 12/19/2002 at 4:02 PM Martin Algesten
It is on my todo list ( I also need this to work, at least for 500 ).
Do you have a patch ?
Costin
Donald Ball wrote:
Are any tomcat developers going to express any interest in this issue? I
frankly consider being completely ignored to be quite rude and a poor way
to interact with the
On 12/19/2002 at 4:02 PM Martin Algesten wrote:
The problem with this bug is that there are people here who don't agree
it is a bug... which is just plain ignorant and stupid... THIS IS A
BUGIT NEEDS FIXING!
Thank you - now I at least know that other people have observed this
behavior and
The problem with this bug is that there are people here who don't agree
it is a bug... which is just plain ignorant and stupid... THIS IS A
BUGIT NEEDS FIXING!
I've tried get this one sorted as well... however, either someone will
tell you they don't agree it is a bug and/or they will just
10 matches
Mail list logo
